23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Common Infections in Patients Prescribed Systemic Glucocorticoids in Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , * , 1 , 1
      PLoS Medicine
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Little is known about the relative risk of common bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections in the general population of individuals exposed to systemic glucocorticoids, or about the impact of glucocorticoid exposure duration and predisposing factors on this risk.

          Methods and Findings

          The hazard ratios of various common infections were assessed in 275,072 adults prescribed glucocorticoids orally for ≥15 d (women: 57.8%, median age: 63 [interquartile range 48–73] y) in comparison to those not prescribed glucocorticoids. For each infection, incidence rate ratios were calculated for five durations of exposure (ranging from 15–30 d to >12 mo), and risk factors were assessed. Data were extracted from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database. When compared to those with the same underlying disease but not exposed to glucocorticoids, the adjusted hazard ratios for infections with significantly higher risk in the glucocorticoid-exposed population ranged from 2.01 (95% CI 1.83–2.19; p < 0.001) for cutaneous cellulitis to 5.84 (95% CI 5.61–6.08; p < 0.001) for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). There was no difference in the risk of scabies, dermatophytosis and varicella. The relative increase in risk was stable over the durations of exposure, except for LRTI and local candidiasis, for which it was much higher during the first weeks of exposure. The risks of infection increased with age and were higher in those with diabetes, in those prescribed higher glucocorticoid doses, and in those with lower plasma albumin level. Most associations were also dependent on the underlying disease. A sensitivity analysis conducted on all individuals except those with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease produced similar results. Another sensitivity analysis assessing the impact of potential unmeasured confounders such as disease severity or concomitant prescription of chemotherapy suggested that it was unlikely that adjusting for these potential confounders would have radically changed the findings. Limitations of our study include the use of electronic medical records, which could have resulted in some degree of misclassification of the infectious outcomes; a possible reporting bias, as general practitioners could be more prone to record an infection in those exposed to glucocorticoids; and a low number of events for some outcomes such as scabies or varicella, which may have led to limited statistical power.

          Conclusions

          The relative risk of LRTI and local candidiasis is very high during the first weeks of glucocorticoid exposure. Further studies are needed to assess whether low albumin level is a risk factor for infection by itself (e.g., by being associated with a higher free glucocorticoid fraction) or whether it reflects other underlying causes of general debilitation.

          Abstract

          Fardet and colleagues present a large population study assessing the risks of developing infections following glucocorticoid treatment. They describe the impact of age and other conditions such as diabetes on developing infections.

          Editors’ Summary

          Background

          Throughout life, our immune system protects us from attack by disease-causing organisms. When a virus, bacterium, fungus, or parasite enters the human body, the immune system detects the invader and triggers a response that kills or neutralizes it. Normally, the immune system discriminates perfectly between foreign invaders and the body’s own cells and tissues, but sometimes it goes awry and begins to attack “self,” resulting in the development of an autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis (in which the immune system attacks the joints) or lupus erythematosus (in which the immune system attacks numerous tissues and organs). Immune system dysfunction is also involved in chronic inflammatory conditions. Tissue inflammation (pain, heat, redness, and swelling) is part of the normal immune response, but uncontrolled inflammation underlies sepsis (a systemic inflammatory condition that sometimes develops after a localized infection) and lung conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

          Why Was This Study Done?

          Inflammatory diseases and autoimmune diseases are often treated with glucocorticoids—drugs with immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties. At any one time, more than 1% of the US and UK population is receiving systemic glucocorticoid therapy (whole-body therapy often given as a pill) to treat an autoimmune or inflammatory condition or to treat cancer or prevent organ rejection after transplantation. But, although prednisolone, dexamethasone, and other glucocorticoids are effective treatments for these conditions, long-term use of oral glucocorticoids is associated with serious side effects, including an increased infection risk. Several studies have investigated the overall risk of infection in specific populations receiving glucocorticoids, but little is known about the risk of individual common infections among people in the general population taking glucocorticoids. Here, the researchers undertake a population-based cohort study—an observational investigation that compares specific outcomes in groups (cohorts) of people from the general population with different baseline characteristics—to discover more about common infections in patients prescribed systemic glucocorticoids in primary care.

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?

          Using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database, the researchers identified 275,072 adults prescribed oral glucocorticoids in the UK between 2000 and 2012, a random sample of people not prescribed glucocorticoids but with a diagnosis of the same underlying disease as the exposed individuals, and cases of infection in both cohorts. Compared to the unexposed group, the glucocorticoid-exposed group had an increased risk of three bacterial infections (septicemia, lower respiratory tract infection [LRTI], and cutaneous cellulitis), one viral infection (herpes zoster), and one fungal infection (local candidiasis) but no increased risk of varicella virus infection, dermatophytosis (a fungal infection), or scabies (a parasitic infection). The increased risk was highest for LRTI—the risk of LRTI was nearly six-fold higher in the glucocorticoid-exposed group than in the unexposed group. The relative increase in infection risk was similar whatever the duration of glucocorticoid therapy except for LRTI and local candidiasis, for which it was higher in the first few weeks of treatment. The risk of infection increased with age and was higher in people with diabetes, in people given high glucocorticoid doses, and in people with low blood albumin levels. Finally, the risks of different infections depended on the disease for which glucocorticoids were prescribed.

          What Do These Findings Mean?

          These findings show that the risk of several (but not all) common bacterial, viral, and fungal infections was higher among people prescribed glucocorticoids for a range of underlying diseases than among people matched for age, gender, and underlying disease who were not prescribed glucocorticoids. Notably, the relative risk of LRTI and local candidiasis was particularly high during the first weeks of glucocorticoid exposure. Several aspects of the study design may affect the accuracy of these findings. For example, the use of medical records may have resulted in some misclassification of infectious outcomes. However, the finding of a high risk of LRTI in patients prescribed systemic glucocorticoids should be considered before prescribing these drugs, particularly in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The finding of an association between low blood albumin level and increased infection risk needs further investigation to determine whether a low albumin level is a direct risk factor for infection or a marker for other underlying causes of debilitation that increase the risk of infection, but it may be worth considering monitoring albumin level before and during glucocorticoid treatment.

          Additional Information

          This list of resources contains links that can be accessed when viewing the PDF on a device or via the online version of the article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002024.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates.

          The degree of generalisability of patient databases to the general population is important for interpreting database research. This report describes the representativeness of The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a UK primary care database, of the UK population. Demographics, deprivation (Townsend), Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) condition prevalence and deaths from THIN were compared with national statistical and QOF 2006/2007 data. Demographics were similar although THIN contained fewer people aged under 25 years. Condition prevalence was comparable, e.g. 3.5% diabetes prevalence in THIN, 3.7% nationally. More THIN patients lived in the most affluent areas (23.5% in THIN, 20% nationally). Between 1990 and 2009, standardised mortality ratio ranged from 0.81 (95% CI: 0.39-1.49; 1990) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.48-1.64; 1995). Adjusting for demographics/deprivation, the 2006 THIN death rate was 9.08/1000 population close to the national death rate of 9.4/1000 population. THIN is generalisable to the UK for demographics, major condition prevalence and death rates adjusted for demographics and deprivation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids.

            Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects that are used to treat diverse diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and acute kidney transplant rejection. The most commonly used systemic glucocorticoids are hydrocortisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. These glucocorticoids have good oral bioavailability and are eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of the metabolites. Plasma concentrations follow a biexponential pattern. Two-compartment models are used after intravenous administration, but one-compartment models are sufficient after oral administration.The effects of glucocorticoids are mediated by genomic and possibly nongenomic mechanisms. Genomic mechanisms include activation of the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor that leads to activation or repression of protein synthesis, including cytokines, chemokines, inflammatory enzymes and adhesion molecules. Thus, inflammation and immune response mechanisms may be modified. Nongenomic mechanisms might play an additional role in glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Clinical efficacy depends on glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as the elimination half-life, and pharmacodynamic parameters such as the concentration producing the half-maximal effect, determine the duration and intensity of glucocorticoid effects. The special contribution of either of these can be distinguished with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. We performed simulations with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using T helper cell counts and endogenous cortisol as biomarkers for the effects of methylprednisolone. These simulations suggest that the clinical efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoid regimens might be increased with twice-daily glucocorticoid administration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Glucocorticoids and invasive fungal infections.

              Since the 1990s, opportunistic fungal infections have emerged as a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in profoundly immunocompromised patients. Hypercortisolaemic patients, both those with endogenous Cushing's syndrome and, much more frequently, those receiving exogenous glucocorticoid therapy, are especially at risk of such infections. This vulnerability is attributed to the complex dysregulation of immunity caused by glucocorticoids. We critically review the spectrum and presentation of invasive fungal infections that arise in the setting of hypercortisolism, and the ways in which glucocorticoids contribute to their pathogenesis. A better knowledge of the interplay between glucocorticoid-induced immunosuppression and invasive fungal infections should assist in earlier recognition and treatment of such infections. Efforts to decrease the intensity of glucocorticoid therapy should help to improve outcomes of opportunistic fungal infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                24 May 2016
                May 2016
                : 13
                : 5
                : e1002024
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris, France
                [3 ]EA 7379 Epidémiologie en Dermatologie et Evaluation des Thérapeutiques, Université Paris–Est Créteil, UPEC Paris 12, Créteil, France
                University of Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: LF IP IN. Performed the experiments: LF IP IN. Analyzed the data: LF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LF IP. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: LF. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: LF IP IN. Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: LF IP IN. All authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship.

                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-15-02055
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002024
                4878789
                27218256
                7e0753bb-eef7-4db3-abb2-836fc3f221ee
                © 2016 Fardet et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 July 2015
                : 13 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 20
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Genitourinary Infections
                Candidiasis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Candidiasis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Albumins
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Septicemia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Septicemia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Asthma
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Opportunistic Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Fungal Diseases
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Parasitic Diseases
                Custom metadata
                The data used for this study was obtained from a license to THIN. For further information on access to the database please contact IMS Health (contact details can be found on http://www.csdmruk.imshealth.com/index.html). Code lists used for this study are provided as a Supporting Information file: S1 Table.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article