2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Integrating Electronic Health Record, Cancer Registry, and Geospatial Data to Study Lung Cancer in Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Ethnic Groups

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          A relatively high proportion of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) females with lung cancer have never smoked. We used an integrative data approach to assemble a large-scale cohort to study lung cancer risk among AANHPIs by smoking status with attention to representation of specific AANHPI ethnic groups.

          Methods:

          We leveraged electronic health records (EHRs) from two healthcare systems—Sutter Health in northern California and Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i—that have high representation of AANHPI populations. We linked EHR data on lung cancer risk factors (i.e., smoking, lung diseases, infections, reproductive factors, and body size) to data on incident lung cancer diagnoses from statewide population-based cancer registries of California and Hawai'i for the period between 2000 and 2013. Geocoded address data were linked to data on neighborhood contextual factors and regional air pollutants.

          Results:

          The dataset comprises over 2.2 million adult females and males of any race/ethnicity. Over 250,000 are AANHPI females (19.6% of the female study population). Smoking status is available for over 95% of individuals. The dataset includes 7,274 lung cancer cases, including 613 cases among AANHPI females. Prevalence of never-smoking status varied greatly among AANHPI females with incident lung cancer, from 85.7% among Asian Indian to 14.4% among Native Hawaiian females.

          Conclusion:

          We have developed a large, multilevel dataset particularly well-suited to conduct prospective studies of lung cancer risk among AANHPI females who never smoked.

          Impact:

          The integrative data approach is an effective way to conduct cancer research assessing multilevel factors on cancer outcomes among small populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lung cancer in never smokers--a different disease.

            Although most lung cancers are a result of smoking, approximately 25% of lung cancer cases worldwide are not attributable to tobacco use, accounting for over 300,000 deaths each year. Striking differences in the epidemiological, clinical and molecular characteristics of lung cancers arising in never smokers versus smokers have been identified, suggesting that they are separate entities. This Review summarizes our current knowledge of this unique and poorly understood disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups.

              The majority of research on breast cancer risk and socioeconomic status (SES) has been conducted for blacks and whites. This study evaluates the relationship between SES and breast cancer incidence in California for four race/ethnic groups. Principal component analysis was used to create an SES index using 1990 Census data. Untracted cases were randomly allocated to census block groups within their county of residence. A total of 97,227 female breast cancer cases diagnosed in California between 1988 and 1992 were evaluated. Incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) were estimated and a chi2 test for trend across SES levels was performed. SES was positively related to breast cancer incidence, and this effect was stronger for Hispanics and Asian/others than for whites and blacks. Adjusting by SES did not eliminate the differences in breast cancer rates among race/ethnic groups. RR differences between the race/ethnic groups were greatest in the lowest SES category and attenuated with increasing SES. An increasing trend over SES was statistically significant for all race/ethnic groups. Including randomly allocated cases affected RR estimates for white women only. Our results are consistent with similar findings for the Los Angeles area but differ from previous results for the San Francisco Bay area.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
                American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
                1055-9965
                1538-7755
                August 01 2021
                May 17 2021
                August 01 2021
                May 17 2021
                : 30
                : 8
                : 1506-1516
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
                [2 ]Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
                [3 ]San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, California.
                [4 ]University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California.
                [5 ]Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
                [6 ]Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California San Francisco, San Fransisco, California.
                [7 ]Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i Center for Integrated Health Care Research, Honolulu, Hawaii.
                [8 ]Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
                [9 ]VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
                Article
                10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0019
                34001502
                7e3550d8-2e29-416e-9b4c-dc8f74547978
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article