28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Testing for Local Adaptation to Spawning Habitat in Sympatric Subpopulations of Pike by Reciprocal Translocation of Embryos

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We tested for local adaption in early life-history traits by performing a reciprocal translocation experiment with approximately 2,500 embryos of pike ( Esox lucius) divided in paired split-family batches. The experiment indicated local adaptation in one of the two subpopulations manifested as enhanced hatching success of eggs in the native habitat, both when compared to siblings transferred to a non-native habitat, and when compared to immigrant genotypes from the other subpopulation. Gene-by-environment effects on viability of eggs and larvae were evident in both subpopulations, showing that there existed genetic variation allowing for evolutionary responses to divergent selection, and indicating a capacity for plastic responses to environmental change. Next, we tested for differences in female life-history traits. Results uncovered that females from one population invested more resources into reproduction and also produced more (but smaller) eggs in relation to their body size compared to females from the other population. We suggest that these females have adjusted their reproductive strategies as a counter-adaptation because a high amount of sedimentation on the eggs in that subpopulations spawning habitat might benefit smaller eggs. Collectively, our findings point to adaptive divergence among sympatric subpopulations that are physically separated only for a short period during reproduction and early development—which is rare. These results illustrate how combinations of translocation experiments and field studies of life-history traits might infer about local adaptation and evolutionary divergence among populations. Local adaptations in subdivided populations are important to consider in management and conservation of biodiversity, because they may otherwise be negatively affected by harvesting, supplementation, and reintroduction efforts targeted at endangered populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

          Understanding the ecological consequences of biodiversity is a fundamental challenge. Research on a key component of biodiversity, genetic diversity, has traditionally focused on its importance in evolutionary processes, but classical studies in evolutionary biology, agronomy and conservation biology indicate that genetic diversity might also have important ecological effects. Our review of the literature reveals significant effects of genetic diversity on ecological processes such as primary productivity, population recovery from disturbance, interspecific competition, community structure, and fluxes of energy and nutrients. Thus, genetic diversity can have important ecological consequences at the population, community and ecosystem levels, and in some cases the effects are comparable in magnitude to the effects of species diversity. However, it is not clear how widely these results apply in nature, as studies to date have been biased towards manipulations of plant clonal diversity, and little is known about the relative importance of genetic diversity vs. other factors that influence ecological processes of interest. Future studies should focus not only on documenting the presence of genetic diversity effects but also on identifying underlying mechanisms and predicting when such effects are likely to occur in nature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence

            Many studies have recorded phenotypic changes in natural populations and attributed them to climate change. However, controversy and uncertainty has arisen around three levels of inference in such studies. First, it has proven difficult to conclusively distinguish whether phenotypic changes are genetically based or the result of phenotypic plasticity. Second, whether or not the change is adaptive is usually assumed rather than tested. Third, inferences that climate change is the specific causal agent have rarely involved the testing – and exclusion – of other potential drivers. We here review the various ways in which the above inferences have been attempted, and evaluate the strength of support that each approach can provide. This methodological assessment sets the stage for 11 accompanying review articles that attempt comprehensive syntheses of what is currently known – and not known – about responses to climate change in a variety of taxa and in theory. Summarizing and relying on the results of these reviews, we arrive at the conclusion that evidence for genetic adaptation to climate change has been found in some systems, but is still relatively scarce. Most importantly, it is clear that more studies are needed – and these must employ better inferential methods – before general conclusions can be drawn. Overall, we hope that the present paper and special issue provide inspiration for future research and guidelines on best practices for its execution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs.

              The long history of reciprocal transplant studies testing the hypothesis of local adaptation has shown that populations are often adapted to their local environments. Yet many studies have not demonstrated local adaptation, suggesting that sometimes native populations are no better adapted than are genotypes from foreign environments. Local adaptation may also lead to trade-offs, in which adaptation to one environment comes at a cost of adaptation to another environment. I conducted a survey of published studies of local adaptation to quantify its frequency and magnitude and the costs associated with local adaptation. I also quantified the relationship between local adaptation and environmental differences and the relationship between local adaptation and phenotypic divergence. The overall frequency of local adaptation was 0.71, and the magnitude of the native population advantage in relative fitness was 45%. Divergence between home site environments was positively associated with the magnitude of local adaptation, but phenotypic divergence was not. I found a small negative correlation between a population's relative fitness in its native environment and its fitness in a foreign environment, indicating weak trade-offs associated with local adaptation. These results suggest that populations are often locally adapted but stochastic processes such as genetic drift may limit the efficacy of divergent selection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 May 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 5
                : e0154488
                Affiliations
                [001]Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model systems, EEMiS, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden
                University of Connecticut, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exists.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HB ON PT PL AF. Performed the experiments: HB ON PT. Analyzed the data: HB ON. Wrote the paper: HB ON PT PL AF.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-7618
                Article
                PONE-D-15-49638
                10.1371/journal.pone.0154488
                4854435
                27139695
                7e679e43-7563-440c-86e2-4ff1293bb3d3
                © 2016 Berggren et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 November 2015
                : 14 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005967, Linnéuniversitetet;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005967, Linnéuniversitetet;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004200, Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004200, Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare;
                Award Recipient :
                Funding was provided by Linnaeus University, www.lnu.se (to AF and PL) and The Swedish Research Council, www.vr.se (grant A0532701 to AF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Processes
                Natural Selection
                Reproductive Success
                Hatching Success
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Population Genetics
                Natural Selection
                Reproductive Success
                Hatching Success
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Population Genetics
                Natural Selection
                Reproductive Success
                Hatching Success
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Genetics
                Natural Selection
                Reproductive Success
                Hatching Success
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Aquatic Environments
                Freshwater Environments
                Wetlands
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Aquatic Environments
                Freshwater Environments
                Wetlands
                Earth Sciences
                Geomorphology
                Topography
                Landforms
                Wetlands
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Processes
                Evolutionary Adaptation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Embryology
                Yolk Sac
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Habitats
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Metamorphosis
                Larvae
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Genetics
                Custom metadata
                Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gr6t5. Data package title: Data from: Testing for Local Adaptation to Spawning Habitat in Sympatric Subpopulations of Pike by Reciprocal Translocation of Embryos. Data files: Reciprocal translocation experiment, and Data on female reproductive investment in pike from two subpopulations.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article