46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Arbidol (Umifenovir) on COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Treatment of patients with COVID-19 has included supportive care to mainly relief symptoms of the disease. Although World Health Organization (WHO) has not recommended any effective treatments for COVID-19, there are some reports about use of antiviral drugs. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Arbidol (ARB) on COVID-19 disease.

          Methods

          Using an open-label randomized controlled trial, we examined the efficacy of ARB in patients with COVID-19 in a teaching hospital. One hundred eligible patients with diagnosis of COVID-19 were recruited in the study and assigned randomly to two groups of either hydroxychloroquine followed by KALETRA (Lopinavir/ritonavir) or hydroxychloroquine followed by ARB. The primary outcome was hospitalization duration and clinical improvement 7 days after admission. The criteria of improvement were relief of cough, dyspnea, and fever. Time to relief from fever was also assessed across the two groups. Without any dropouts, 100 patients were entered into the study for the final analysis at significance level of 0.05.

          Results

          The mean age of patients was 56.6 (17.8) years and 56.2 (14.8) years in ARB and KALETRA groups, respectively. Majority of patients were male across two groups (66 and 54%). The duration of hospitalization in ARB group was significantly less than KALETRA arm (7.2 versus 9.6 days; P = 0.02). Time to relief fever was almost similar across two groups (2.7 versus 3.1 days in ARB and KALETRA arms, respectively). Peripheral oxygen saturation rate was significantly different after 7 days of admission across two groups (94% versus 92% in ARB and KALETRA groups respectively) ( P = 0.02). Based on multiple linear regression analysis, IHD, Na level, and oxygen saturation at the time of admission and type of therapy were the independent adjusted variables that determined the duration of hospitalization in patients with COVID-19.

          Conclusion

          Our findings showed that Arbidol, compared to KALETRA, significantly contributes to clinical and laboratory improvements, including peripheral oxygen saturation, requiring ICU admissions, duration of hospitalization, chest CT involvements, WBC, and ESR. We suggest further studies on ARB against COVID-19 using larger sample size and multicenter design.

          Trial registration

          IRCT20180725040596N2 on 18 April 2020.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19

          Highlights • On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group. • 44.1% of patients in lopinavir/ritonavir group had positive RNA test on day 14. • Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test. • No apparent side effects were found in both groups. • Arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Arbidol combined with LPV/r versus LPV/r alone against Corona Virus Disease 2019: A retrospective cohort study

            Highlights • Patients were given oral arbidol and LPV/r in the combination group and oral LPV/r only in the monotherapy group for 5–21 days. • Our study shows that oral arbidol and LPV/r in the combination group is associated with a significant elevated negative conversion rate of coronavirus’ test in 7-day and 14-day, compared with LPV/r only in the monotherapy group. • Combination therapy is associated with a significantly improved the chest CT scans in 7-day. • We suppose that reducing the viral load as soon as possible could benefit the delay of the progression of lung lesions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Taking the right measures to control COVID-19

              The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which originated in Wuhan, China, in December, 2019, has been declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO. 1 By March 2, 2020, 80 026 confirmed cases had been reported in China, causing 2009 deaths, and the epidemic had spread to 25 countries around the world. 2 On Jan 20, 2020, China declared the disease a second-class infectious disease but has introduced management measures for a first-class infectious disease (considered the most dangerous category of infection). Most areas of the country have adopted public health first-level response measures (considered the highest level of response). In the face of the rapidly spreading disease and a large number of infected people, there is an urgent need for effective infection prevention and control measures. However, some of the measures that have been introduced have no scientific basis and have proven to be ineffective. First, although COVID-19 is spread by the airborne route, air disinfection of cities and communities is not known to be effective for disease control and needs to be stopped. The widespread practice of spraying disinfectant and alcohol in the sky, on roads, vehicles, and personnel has no value; moreover, large quantities of alcohol and disinfectant are potentially harmful to humans and should be avoided.3, 4 Second, in the use of personal protective equipment, we should try to distinguish different risk factors, adopt different epidemic prevention measures, and reduce the waste of personal protective equipment, as these resources are already in short supply. Although surgical masks are in widespread use by the general population, there is no evidence that these masks prevent the acquisition of COVID-19, although they might slightly reduce the spread from an infected patient. High-filtration masks such as N95 masks and protective clothing (goggles and gowns) should be used in hospitals where health-care workers are in direct contact with infected patients. 5 Third, the practice of blocking traffic and lockdown of villages is of no value for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, some countries have suspended flights to and from China, and prevented Chinese people from travelling to their countries; both of these actions violate WHO International Health Regulations. 6 Similarly, in community prevention and control of the disease, the measures taken by individual villages and communities to seal off roads are of no value. 7 Such measures could result in civil unrest and reduce compliance with infection prevention and control advice. Fourth, public health education must be based on scientific evidence to reduce the anxiety and distress caused by misinformation. In particular, epidemiological findings need to be reported in a timely and objective manner so that they can be accurately assessed and interpreted. The risk of transmission with brief contact (less than 15 min face-to-face contact) or infection onset after 14 days of exposure to a known infected person (the estimated maximum incubation period) is low and should not be over-exaggerated. Misinformation spreads panic among the general population and is not conducive to implementation of epidemic control measures. 8 Fifth, WHO has made it clear that there are currently no known effective treatments for COVID-19 and does not recommend the use of antiviral drugs, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, or traditional Chinese medicine. Despite this, there have been reports of the use of oseltamivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, prednisone, antibiotics, and traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. 9 Care should be taken to not give patients drugs of unknown efficacy, which might be detrimental to critically ill patients with COVID-19; clinical trials are urgently required in this context. 10 Likewise, the development of a vaccine is an urgent public health priority. COVID-19 is an emerging infectious disease of global public health concern. Efforts to control the COVID-19 epidemic are likely to require an evidence-based, multifactorial approach. First, there is a need to limit human-to-human transmission, including reducing secondary infections among close contacts and health-care workers, preventing transmission amplification events, and preventing further international spread. Second, there is a need to rapidly identify, isolate, and provide optimised care for patients. Third, we need to identify and reduce transmission from the animal source or sources. Fourth, we need to address crucial uncertainties such as clinical severity, extent of transmission and infection, and treatment options, and accelerate the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. We also need to minimise social disruption and economic impact through international, collaborative and multisectoral approaches. Most importantly, we need to communicate the epidemiology and risks of COVID-19 clearly, both to health-care workers and to the general population, and to implement infection prevention and control measures that are based on sound scientific principles.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mnojomi@iums.ac.ir
                yasin.z@iums.ac.ir
                keyvani.h@iums.ac.ir
                jamshidimakiani.m@iums.ac.ir
                roham.m@iums.ac.ir
                laali.a@iums.ac.ir
                nasir.dehghan@gmail.com
                m.navaei66@yahoo.com
                mitraranjbar@yahoo.com , ranjbar.m@iums.ac.ir
                Journal
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infectious Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2334
                14 December 2020
                14 December 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 954
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Preventive Medicine & Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [3 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [4 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [5 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Firoozgar General Hospital, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [6 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [7 ]GRID grid.411746.1, ISNI 0000 0004 4911 7066, Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, , Iran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                Article
                5698
                10.1186/s12879-020-05698-w
                7734453
                33317461
                7e7cdd7c-dc11-494c-8601-da13c4d596e7
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 2 September 2020
                : 8 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012021, Iran University of Medical Sciences;
                Award ID: 17640
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                arbidol,corona virus,covid-19,efficacy
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                arbidol, corona virus, covid-19, efficacy

                Comments

                Comment on this article