Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Corrigendum: He XL, Horak E, Wang D, Li TH, Peng WH, Gan BC (2019) Descriptions of five new species in Entoloma subgenus Claudopus from China, with molecular phylogeny of Entoloma s.l. MycoKeys 61: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.46446

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Entoloma subgenus Claudopus is widely distributed, yet the taxonomy and systematics of its species are still poorly documented. In the present study, more than forty collections of Claudopus were gathered in China and subsequently analysed, based on morphological and molecular data. The results revealed first a high level of species diversity of Claudopus in China and second, there is a wide ecological range regarding the substrates and the habitats ranging from temperate, tropical to subalpine locations. Based on morphological and molecular evidence, five novel species from China are proposed, viz. E. conchatum, E. flabellatum, E. gregarium, E. pleurotoides and E. reductum. Molecular phylogeny of Entoloma s.l. was also reconstructed, based on 187 representatives of Entoloma s.l. by employing the combined ITS, LSU, mtSSU and RPB2 sequences. Ten monophyletic clades (Claudopus, Leptonia, Nolanea, Cuboid-spored Inocephalus, “Alboleptonia”, Cyanula, Pouzarella, Rhodopolia, Prunuloides and Rusticoides) were recovered, while 13 taxa could not be placed in any defined clades. The results confirmed that Claudopus in a traditional morphological sense is not monophyletic and the Rusticoides-group, previously considered within Claudopus, formed a separate clade; but section Claudopus and relatives of E. undatum belong to a distinctive monophyletic group. Despite some monophyletic groups in Entoloma s.l. being distinctive in both morphology and molecular phylogeny, they were still treated as subgenera of Entoloma s.l. temporarily, because accepting them as genera will make Entoloma s.l. paraphyletic.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          MycoKeys
          MycoKeys
          11
          urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:C004A564-9D6A-5F9F-B058-6A3815DFE9C3
          MycoKeys
          Pensoft Publishers
          1314-4057
          1314-4049
          2020
          02 March 2020
          02 March 2020
          : 63
          : 163-172
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences Chengdu China
          [2 ] Schlossfeld 17, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria Unaffiliated Innsbruck Austria
          [3 ] State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Xiao-Lan He ( xl_he@ 123456qq.com )

          Academic editor: María P. Martín

          Article
          49739
          10.3897/mycokeys.63.49739
          7062847
          Xiao-Lan He, Egon Horak, Di Wang, Tai-Hui Li, Wei-Hong Peng, Bing-Cheng Gan

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          Funding
          NSFC - National Natural Science Foundation of China
          Categories
          Corrigenda
          Agaricomycetes
          Basidiomycota
          Phylogeny
          Taxonomy

          Comments

          Comment on this article