13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In Memoriam Terje Sagvolden

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is with great sadness that we note the sudden passing of our colleague and friend Professor Terje Sagvolden, a highly accomplished neuroscientist, well known across the world for his contribution to our understanding of the neurobiology of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Here we pay tribute to this magnificent man and scientist in an intercontinental recognition of his contribution to science. Terje was a wonderful caring person, a kind considerate friend and a brilliant researcher. Terje was inspiring and creative, as well as a visionary. He pioneered collaborative research and forged links between basic and clinical researchers in different disciplines, across different countries. With Terje's help, the European Network for Hyperkinetic Disorders (Eunethydis), of which he was a founding member, obtained a major EU grant in 1993 that enabled the then participating centres to work on the same ADHD project cross-nationally. The effect of this was to harmonize research efforts in several European groups. This forged the basis for the later projects on genetics and intervention evaluation. In the discussions held at Eunethydis meetings, Terje took up the challenge with his characteristic enthusiasm to demonstrate that the animal model he was using had considerable clinical relevance to ADHD. Terje's seminal work was to demonstrate the relevance of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) for human ADHD. As Figure 1 shows, a PubMed search indicates that from 1980 to 2010, there was an exponential growth of research using the SHR as an animal model of ADHD or hyperactivity. Figure 1 Number of PubMed Publications about the SHR and ADHD. In 1998 there is the first major spike. This was primarily due to a special issue of Behavioural Brain Research that Terje edited with Joseph Sergeant and contained the particularly important contribution from the Naples group, led by Adolfo Sadile, who Terje met in 1980 in Erice, Sicily. They forged a partnership in the European Brain and Behaviour Society (EBBS) and Society for Neuroscience meetings. Terje became the secretary of EBBS and gave an enormous impulse to the growth of that society. At Eunethydis meetings, the Oslo and Naples groups developed fruitful novel questions, experimental approaches, and produced innovative results, which have been applied to human ADHD. Animal models in ADHD were something new in the 1980s, hence the challenge on their clinical relevance. By comparing ADHD traits between the SHR and the Wistar Kyoto (WKY) reference strain, Terje was able to establish unequivocally a genetic basis for ADHD traits in the SHR [1], mRNA expression profiles in the brain [2], the genetics of intra-individual variability [3,4] and the effects of methylphenidate on dopamine transporter density [3,4]. Terje made important contributions toward understanding the genetics of ADHD. Because the brains of ADHD patients cannot be studied, some work would not have been possible without a valid animal model of the disorder. Terje validated the SHR as a suitable model of ADHD, although several such models had been proposed, the SHR stands alone it its ability to mimic the fundamental behavioural characteristics of ADHD, conform to a theoretical rationale for ADHD, and predict aspects of ADHD behaviour, genetics, and neurobiology [5-7]. In the premature last phase of his research, Terje made another key discovery that will make lasting contributions to the genetics of ADHD. Although WKY rats had routinely been used as a reference strain without regard to source, Terje showed substantial behavioural and genetic differences in strains from different laboratories [8,9]. This led to the further discovery that WKY rats from Charles River, Germany (WKY/NCrl) showed inattention, but no overactivity or impulsiveness and thus were a suitable model of inattentive ADHD. In contrast, he showed that WKY rats from Harlan, UK were a suitable reference strain for both the SHR and the WKY/NCrl [8,9]. By providing researchers with genetic rat models of both combined-type (SHR) and inattentive (WKY/NCrl) ADHD, Terje will continue to influence the course of ADHD genetics research for decades to come. Through his work within Eunethydis, he profoundly influenced the work of a younger generation of ADHD researchers, especially through his enthusiastic promotion of reinforcement and learning as an important focus for human ADHD research. This insight has played a seminal role in the fundamental shift in focus from cognitive to motivational models of ADHD that has occurred in the field. In that process of change, Terje took students and new colleagues under his wings and gave them the opportunity to take part in his own research and networks to form their own careers. Terje's ability to be always true to himself was a hallmark of his character. Africa would like to offer a special tribute to Terje. He was a great friend of the late Professor James Kamani and one of the founders of neuroscience in Africa. He played a significant role in the establishment of the Society of Neuroscientists of Africa (SONA) in 1993. Terje continued to support the promotion of neuroscience in Africa. He served on the International Advisory Committee of SONA and, together with Raj Kalaria, Michael Zigmond, Beth Fischer, Marina Bentivoglio, Anneke Meyer, and others, organized the 1st IBRO school in Africa which was hosted by the University of the North in 2000, in Pietersburg, South Africa. Terje remained a faithful supporter of IBRO, particularly in African activities, organizing ADHD workshops and establishing an ADHD network in Africa. Terje had very close links with the University of the North, which became the University of Limpopo in 2005. He held his first workshop there in 1997 and was instrumental in obtaining funds from theNorwegian Universities' Committee for Development Research and Education (NUFU), which kept the ADHD project in Limpopo going for 12 years. Under his guidance a very important epidemiological study was completed, involving six different ethnic groups. More cross-cultural neuropsychological projects followed. He was co-supervisor for a number of PhD students, who will sadly miss his expert guidance and warm encouragement. In 2008 he organised a week long workshop on scientific writing in Oslo for the PhD students from Limpopo. This was an unforgettable event as for most of them it was their first time to travel outside South Africa. He will be sadly missed at this institution as a co-worker, teacher, and mentor, but above all for his warm-hearted interest and friendship. Terje's approach to research was collaborative and multidisciplinary. He facilitated several collaborative projects across the world. In the academic year 2004-2005, he led an international research group at the Centre for Advanced Studies at the Norwegian Academy for Science and Letters which for so many of us was a key catalyst in generating new ideas and new lines of research thus enhancing our international collaborations (as illustrated by joint publications and the establishment of Behavioral and Brain Functions in 2005). In 2005 he also established the Oslo ADHD Group, integrating basic studies of anatomy, neurophysiology, neuropsychology, genetics, and behaviour. The group presented their research at a symposium in Oslo in 2010, together with researchers from Canada, South Africa, the US and Europe. Terje believed in collaboration, openness and willingness to share one's knowledge, insights and ideas in order to move science forward. Always innovative and creative, Terje played a major role in designing experiments for children that were directly analogous to the behavioural studies with animals. Through building a response apparatus that could be operated by children in much the same way as that for the rats, behavioural responses could be analyzed in the same way across species [10]. Ultimately, behavioural patterns obtained with the rats could be validated against the clinical case of ADHD. The task was further developed into computer-based tasks that were used both in Norway and in South-Africa, showing that basic behavioural mechanisms operated the same way across cultures [11,12]. The list of contributions to the field of ADHD is impressive but fails to capture the passion with which he worked and interacted with his colleagues, who will sorely miss him (Figure 2). Figure 2 Professor Terje Sagvolden.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes.

          Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is currently defined as a cognitive/behavioral developmental disorder where all clinical criteria are behavioral. Inattentiveness, overactivity, and impulsiveness are presently regarded as the main clinical symptoms. The dynamic developmental behavioral theory is based on the hypothesis that altered dopaminergic function plays a pivotal role by failing to modulate nondopaminergic (primarily glutamate and GABA) signal transmission appropriately. A hypofunctioning mesolimbic dopamine branch produces altered reinforcement of behavior and deficient extinction of previously reinforced behavior. This gives rise to delay aversion, development of hyperactivity in novel situations, impulsiveness, deficient sustained attention, increased behavioral variability, and failure to "inhibit" responses ("disinhibition"). A hypofunctioning mesocortical dopamine branch will cause attention response deficiencies (deficient orienting responses, impaired saccadic eye movements, and poorer attention responses toward a target) and poor behavioral planning (poor executive functions). A hypofunctioning nigrostriatal dopamine branch will cause impaired modulation of motor functions and deficient nondeclarative habit learning and memory. These impairments will give rise to apparent developmental delay, clumsiness, neurological "soft signs," and a "failure to inhibit" responses when quick reactions are required. Hypofunctioning dopamine branches represent the main individual predispositions in the present theory. The theory predicts that behavior and symptoms in ADHD result from the interplay between individual predispositions and the surroundings. The exact ADHD symptoms at a particular time in life will vary and be influenced by factors having positive or negative effects on symptom development. Altered or deficient learning and motor functions will produce special needs for optimal parenting and societal styles. Medication will to some degree normalize the underlying dopamine dysfunction and reduce the special needs of these children. The theory describes how individual predispositions interact with these conditions to produce behavioral, emotional, and cognitive effects that can turn into relatively stable behavioral patterns.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rodent models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

            An ideal animal model should be similar to the disorder it models in terms of etiology, biochemistry, symptomatology, and treatment. Animal models provide several advantages over clinical research: simpler nervous systems, easily interpreted behaviors, genetic homogeneity, easily controlled environment, and a greater variety of interventions. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurobehavioral disorder of childhood onset that is characterized by inattentiveness, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness. Its diagnosis is behaviorally based; therefore, the validation of an ADHD model must be based in behavior. An ADHD model must mimic the fundamental behavioral characteristics of ADHD (face validity), conform to a theoretical rationale for ADHD (construct validity), and predict aspects of ADHD behavior, genetics, and neurobiology previously uncharted in clinical settings (predictive validity). Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) fulfill many of the validation criteria and compare well with clinical cases of ADHD. Poor performers in the five-choice serial reaction time task and Naples high-excitability rats (NHE) are useful models for attention-deficit disorder. Other animal models either focus on the less important symptom of hyperactivity and might be of limited value in ADHD research or are produced in ways that would not lead to a clinical diagnosis of ADHD in humans, even if ADHD-like behavior is displayed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Behavioral validation of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD).

              A good model of a disorder is one that: (a) mimics, although in a simpler form than the full-blown clinical case, the fundamentals of the behavioral characteristics, in this case of people with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD;face validity); (b) conforms with a theoretical rationale for the disorder (construct validity); and (c) is able to predict aspects of behavior, genetics and neurobiology previously uncharted in the clinics (predictive validity). This article discusses the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) and some other putative animal models of AD/HD. It is argued that although other strains and species may be hyperactive and/or show attention deficits following genetic, environmental or pharmacological interventions, the SHR is presently the only strain shown to have the major behavioral symptoms of AD/HD. This does not mean that investigating other models cannot give valuable information.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behav Brain Funct
                Behavioral and Brain Functions : BBF
                BioMed Central
                1744-9081
                2011
                17 March 2011
                : 7
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Mental Health, Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
                [4 ]Akershus University College, Kjeller, Norway
                [5 ]Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [6 ]School of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa
                [7 ]Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
                [8 ]Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
                [9 ]School of Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
                [10 ]The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                1744-9081-7-5
                10.1186/1744-9081-7-5
                3070631
                21414198
                801d9010-0d4f-48cb-ba46-37b60692037b
                Copyright ©2011 Sergeant et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 February 2011
                : 17 March 2011
                Categories
                Editorial

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_