6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increasing taxonomic diversity and spatial resolution clarifies opportunities for protecting US imperiled species

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Continental‐ and regional‐scale assessments of gaps in protected area networks typically use relatively coarse range maps for well documented species groups, creating uncertainty about the fate of unexamined biodiversity and providing insufficient guidance for land managers. By building habitat suitability models for a taxonomically diverse group of 2216 imperiled plants and animals, we revealed comprehensive and detailed protection opportunities in the conterminous United States. Summing protection‐weighted range‐size rarity (PWRSR, the product of the percent of modeled habitat outside of protected areas and the inverse of modeled habitat extent) uncovered novel patterns of biodiversity importance. Concentrations of unprotected imperiled species in places such as the northern Sierra Nevada, central and northern Arizona, the Rocky Mountains of Utah and Colorado, southeastern Texas, southwestern Arkansas, and Florida's Lake Wales Ridge have rarely if ever been featured in continental‐ and regional‐scale analyses. Inclusion of diverse taxa (vertebrates, freshwater mussels, crayfishes, bumble bees, butterflies, skippers, and vascular plants) partially drove these new patterns. When analyses were restricted to groups typically included in previous studies (birds, mammals, and amphibians), up to 53% of imperiled species in other groups were left out. The finer resolution of modeled inputs (990 m) also resulted in a more geographically dispersed pattern. For example, 90% of the human population of the conterminous United States lives within 50 km of modeled habitat for one or more species with high PWRSR scores. Over one‐half of the habitat for 818 species occurs within federally lands managed for biodiversity protection; an additional 360 species have over one‐half of their modeled habitat on federal multiple use land. Freshwater animals occur in places with poorer landscape condition but with less exposure to climate change than other groups, suggesting that habitat restoration is an important conservation strategy for these species. The results provide fine‐scale, taxonomically diverse inputs for local and regional priority‐setting and show that although protection efforts are still widely needed on private lands, notable gains can be achieved by increasing protection status on selected federal lands.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

            Conservationists are far from able to assist all species under threat, if only for lack of funding. This places a premium on priorities: how can we support the most species at the least cost? One way is to identify 'biodiversity hotspots' where exceptional concentrations of endemic species are undergoing exceptional loss of habitat. As many as 44% of all species of vascular plants and 35% of all species in four vertebrate groups are confined to 25 hotspots comprising only 1.4% of the land surface of the Earth. This opens the way for a 'silver bullet' strategy on the part of conservation planners, focusing on these hotspots in proportion to their share of the world's species at risk.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Decline of the North American avifauna

              Species extinctions have defined the global biodiversity crisis, but extinction begins with loss in abundance of individuals that can result in compositional and functional changes of ecosystems. Using multiple and independent monitoring networks, we report population losses across much of the North American avifauna over 48 years, including once common species and from most biomes. Integration of range-wide population trajectories and size estimates indicates a net loss approaching 3 billion birds, or 29% of 1970 abundance. A continent-wide weather radar network also reveals a similarly steep decline in biomass passage of migrating birds over a recent 10-year period. This loss of bird abundance signals an urgent need to address threats to avert future avifaunal collapse and associated loss of ecosystem integrity, function and services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bruce_young@natureserve.org
                Journal
                Ecol Appl
                Ecol Appl
                10.1002/(ISSN)1939-5582
                EAP
                Ecological Applications
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1051-0761
                1939-5582
                28 February 2022
                April 2022
                : 32
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/eap.v32.3 )
                : e2534
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] NatureServe Arlington Virginia USA
                [ 2 ] New York Natural Heritage Program, College of Environmental Science and Forestry State University of New York Albany New York USA
                [ 3 ] Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
                [ 4 ] ESRI Redlands California USA
                [ 5 ] The Nature Conservancy San Francisco California USA
                [ 6 ] Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation–Division of Natural Heritage Richmond Virginia USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Bruce E. Young

                Email: bruce_young@ 123456natureserve.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-4046
                Article
                EAP2534
                10.1002/eap.2534
                9286056
                35044023
                803dbb11-3084-4941-8a24-5fe8fdcea3e2
                © 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 04 June 2021
                : 30 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 19, Words: 13016
                Funding
                Funded by: Environmental Systems Research Institute , doi 10.13039/100006539;
                Funded by: Microsoft , doi 10.13039/100006112;
                Funded by: The Nature Conservancy , doi 10.13039/100014596;
                Funded by: Weyerhaeuser Giving Fund
                Categories
                Article
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:15.07.2022

                areas of unprotected biodiversity importance,conservation priority setting,habitat suitability models,imperiled species,protected areas,range‐size rarity,spatial resolution,species distribution models

                Comments

                Comment on this article