39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Prior Abdominal Operations on Conversion and Complication Rates in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          A history of a prior abdominal operation is common among patients presenting for laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and its impact on conversion and complication rates has been insufficiently studied. This study compares the conversion rates of patients with and without a prior abdominal operation (PAO).

          Methods:

          We analyzed 1000 consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resection cases.

          Results:

          Complete data on past surgical history were available on 820 of 1000 patients. The overall conversion rate was 14.8% (122/820). A history of PAO was present in 347 patients (42.3%). These patients experienced a higher conversion rate compared with non-PAO patients (68/ 347, 19.6% versus 54/473, 11.4%; P<0.001; OR 1.9). Patients with PAO had a significantly higher rate of inadvertent enterotomy (5/347, 1.4% vs. 1/473, 0.2%; P=0.04; OR 6.9), a higher incidence of postoperative ileus (23/347, 6.6% vs 14/473% 3.0; P=0.012; OR 2.3), and higher reoperative rates (8/347, 2.3% vs 1/473, 0.2%; P=0.006; OR 11.1). The incidence of other complications and mortality (total 6/820, 0.7%) was similar regardless of PAO status.

          Conclusion:

          Having a prior abdominal operation represents a risk factor for conversion in laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. The incidence of a successfully completed laparoscopic operation, however, remains high in previously operated on patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

          Although early reports on laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC) in patients with colon cancer suggested that it reduces perioperative morbidity, its influence on long-term results is unknown. Our study aimed to compare efficacy of LAC and open colectomy (OC) for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer in terms of tumour recurrence and survival. From November, 1993, to July, 1998, all patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon were assessed for entry in this randomised trial. Adjuvant therapy and postoperative follow-up were the same in both groups. The main endpoint was cancer-related survival. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. 219 patients took part in the study (111 LAC group, 108 OC group). Patients in the LAC group recovered faster than those in the OC group, with shorter peristalsis-detection (p=0.001) and oral-intake times (p=0.001), and shorter hospital stays (p=0.005). Morbidity was lower in the LAC group (p=0.001), although LAC did not influence perioperative mortality. Probability of cancer-related survival was higher in the LAC group (p=0.02). The Cox model showed that LAC was independently associated with reduced risk of tumour relapse (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.82), death from any cause (0.48, 0.23-1.01), and death from a cancer-related cause (0.38, 0.16-0.91) compared with OC. This superiority of LAC was due to differences in patients with stage III tumours (p=0.04, p=0.02, and p=0.006, respectively). LAC is more effective than OC for treatment of colon cancer in terms of morbidity, hospital stay, tumour recurrence, and cancer-related survival.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

            Adhesions after abdominal and pelvic surgery are important complications, although their basic epidemiology is unclear. We investigated the frequency of such complications in the general population to provide a basis for the targeting and assessment of new adhesion-prevention measures. We used validated data from the Scottish National Health Service medical record linkage database to identify patients undergoing open abdominal or pelvic surgery in 1986, who had no record of such surgery in the preceding 5 years. Patients were followed up for 10 years and subsequent readmissions were reviewed and outcomes classified by the degree of adhesion. We also assessed the rate of adhesion-related admissions in 1994 for the population of 5 million people. 1209 (5.7%) of all readmissions (21,347) were classified as being directly related to adhesions, with 1169 (3.8%) managed operatively. Overall, 34.6% of the 29,790 patients who underwent open abdominal or pelvic surgery in 1986 were readmitted a mean of 2.1 times over 10 years for a disorder directly or possibly related to adhesions, or for abdominal or pelvic surgery that could be potentially complicated by adhesions. 22.1% of all outcome readmissions occurred in the first year after initial surgery, but readmissions continued steadily throughout the 10-year period. In 1994, 4199 admissions were directly related to adhesions. Postoperative adhesions have important consequences to patients, surgeons, and the health system. Surgical procedures with a high risk of adhesion-related complications need to be identified and adhesion prevention carefully assessed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

              The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection (LR) for colorectal cancer remains to be established. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic with those of open resection for colorectal cancer was undertaken. A literature search was performed for relevant articles published by the end of 2002. Two reviewers independently appraised the trials using a predetermined protocol. Results were analysed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis. The outcomes of 2512 procedures from 12 trials were analysed. LR took on average 32.9 per cent longer to perform than open resection but was associated with lower morbidity rates. Specifically, wound infection rates were significantly lower (odds ratio 0.47 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.28 to 0.80); P = 0.005). In patients undergoing LR, the average time to passage of first flatus was reduced by 33.5 per cent, that to tolerance of a solid diet by 23.9 per cent and that to 80 per cent recovery of peak expiratory flow by 44.3 per cent. Early narcotic analgesia requirements were also reduced by 36.9 per cent, pain at rest by 34.8 per cent and during coughing by 33.9 per cent, and hospital stay by 20.6 per cent. There were no significant differences in perioperative mortality or oncological clearance. LR for colorectal cancer is associated with lower morbidity, less pain, a faster recovery and a shorter hospital stay than open resection, without compromising oncological clearance. Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JSLS
                JSLS
                jsls
                jsls
                JSLS
                JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
                Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Miami, FL )
                1086-8089
                1938-3797
                Apr-Jun 2006
                : 10
                : 2
                : 169-175
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, Pennsylvania.
                Author notes
                Address reprint requests to: Jan Franko, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, 1245 Highland Ave, Ste 604, Abington, PA 19001, USA. Telephone: 215 481 7460, Fax: 215 481 2159, E-mail: jan.franko@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                3016125
                16882414
                80b9cd4a-94c4-43ec-b368-1c89da16caca
                © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Scientific Papers

                Surgery
                intraoperative complications,laparoscopy,postoperative complications,ileus
                Surgery
                intraoperative complications, laparoscopy, postoperative complications, ileus

                Comments

                Comment on this article