7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Vision Impairment With Cognitive Decline Across Multiple Domains in Older Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are there associations between visual and cognitive impairment across multiple cognitive domains and multiple measures of vision?

          Findings

          In this longitudinal cohort study of 1202 older adults, worse visual acuity and stereo acuity impairment were associated with greater declines in language and memory domain scores, whereas worse contrast sensitivity was associated with declines in language, memory, attention, and visuospatial ability domain scores.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that the association between vision and cognition differs by measure of vision and that impaired contrast sensitivity is associated with declines across more cognitive domains than visual acuity.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the association between visual and cognitive impairments across multiple cognitive domains using multiple measures of vision.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Associations between visual and global cognitive impairments have been previously documented, but there is limited research examining these associations between multiple measures of vision across cognitive domains.

          Objective

          To examine the association between vision and cognitive across multiple cognitive domains using multiple measures of vision.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This longitudinal cohort study used data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging for 2003 to 2019. Participants in the current study were aged 60 to 94 years with vision and cognitive measures. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to May 2021.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Cognitive function was measured across multiple domains, including language, memory, attention, executive function, and visuospatial ability. Cognitive domain scores were calculated as the mean of standardized cognitive test scores within each domain. Visual function was assessed using measures of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereo acuity at baseline.

          Results

          Analyses included 1202 participants (610 women [50.8%]; 853 White participants [71.0%]) with a mean (SD) age of 71.1 (8.6) years who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 6.9 (4.7) years. Worse visual acuity (per 0.1 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) at baseline was associated with greater declines in language (β, −0.0035; 95% CI, −0.007 to −0.001) and memory (β, −0.0052; 95% CI, −0.010 to −0.001) domain scores. Worse contrast sensitivity (per 0.1 log units) at baseline was associated with greater declines in language (β, −0.010; 95% CI, −0.014 to −0.006), memory (β, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.015 to −0.003), attention (β, −0.010; 95% CI, −0.017 to −0.003), and visuospatial ability (β, −0.010; 95% CI, −0.017 to −0.002) domain scores. Over the follow-up period, declines on tests of language (β, −0.019; 95% CI, −0.034 to −0.005) and memory (β, −0.032; 95% CI, −0.051 to −0.012) were significantly greater for participants with impaired stereo acuity compared with those without such impairment.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings suggest that the association between vision and cognition differs between visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereo acuity and that patterns of cognitive decline may differ by type of vision impairment, with impaired contrast sensitivity being associated with declines across more cognitive domains than other measures of visual functioning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of causal mechanisms underlying the link between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline.

          Accumulating evidence points to a link between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline, but their relationship is not clear. Does one cause the other, or does some third factor produce both? The answer has critical implications for prevention, rehabilitation, and health policy but has been difficult to establish for several reasons. First, determining a causal relationship in natural, correlational samples is problematic, and hearing and cognition are difficult to measure independently. Here, we critically review the evidence for a link between hearing loss and cognitive decline. We conclude that the evidence is convincing, but that the effects are small when hearing is measured audiometrically. We review four different directional hypotheses that have been offered as explanations for such a link, and conclude that no single hypothesis is sufficient. We introduce a framework that highlights that hearing and cognition rely on shared neurocognitive resources, and relate to each other in several different ways. We also discuss interventions for sensory and cognitive decline that may permit more causal inferences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

            To determine the relationship between hearing loss and cognitive function as assessed with a standardized neurocognitive battery. We hypothesized a priori that greater hearing loss is associated with lower cognitive test scores on tests of memory and executive function. A cross-sectional cohort of 347 participants ≥ 55 years in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging without mild cognitive impairment or dementia had audiometric and cognitive testing performed in 1990-1994. Hearing loss was defined by an average of hearing thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better-hearing ear. Cognitive testing consisted of a standardized neurocognitive battery incorporating tests of mental status, memory, executive function, processing speed, and verbal function. Regression models were used to examine the association between hearing loss and cognition while adjusting for confounders. Greater hearing loss was significantly associated with lower scores on measures of mental status (Mini-Mental State Exam), memory (Free Recall), and executive function (Stroop Mixed, Trail Making B). These results were robust to analyses accounting for potential confounders, nonlinear effects of age, and exclusion of individuals with severe hearing loss. The reduction in cognitive performance associated with a 25 dB hearing loss was equivalent to the reduction associated with an age difference of 6.8 years. Hearing loss is independently associated with lower scores on tests of memory and executive function. Further research examining the longitudinal association of hearing loss with cognitive functioning is needed to confirm these cross-sectional findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                16 July 2021
                July 2021
                16 July 2021
                : 4
                : 7
                : e2117416
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [2 ]Center for Disability Health Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
                [4 ]Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [6 ]Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: May 12, 2021.
                Published: July 16, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17416
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Varadaraj V et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Bonnielin K. Swenor, PhD, MPH, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Wilmer 116, Baltimore, MD 21287 ( bswenor@ 123456jhmi.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Ms Munoz had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Munoz, Ferrucci, Swenor.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Varadaraj, Munoz, Deal, An, Albert, Resnick, Swenor.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Varadaraj, An, Swenor.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Munoz, Deal, Albert, Resnick, Ferrucci, Swenor.
                Statistical analysis: Varadaraj, Munoz, An, Swenor.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Resnick.
                Supervision: Albert, Resnick, Ferrucci, Swenor.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (grant K01AG052640 to Dr Swenor and grant K01AG054693 awarded to Dr Deal).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The funder was involved in the review and approval of the manuscript.
                Article
                zoi210519
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17416
                8285732
                34269806
                80ea4ca2-3f15-4b74-8a7d-99fc24982a23
                Copyright 2021 Varadaraj V et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 27 January 2021
                : 12 May 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Ophthalmology

                Comments

                Comment on this article