Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nurses and internet health-related information: review on access and utility

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To review literature on the nurses’ use and access to Internet Health Related Information (HRI). There is relatively little evidence in published literature on barriers, attitudes and how nurses utilize online health-related information.

          Methods

          Literature search was carried-out on Cumulative Indexes to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Springer and Sage publications. The search timeframe has focused on the outburst of Internet usage between the years 2000 and 2014.

          Results

          Quality of available websites and databases containing health-related information vary widely in their accuracy, validity and reliability that require nurses to continuously evaluate their relevance.

          Conclusion

          Emphasis on the necessity for training in the use of information technology is important to the nurses’ continuous professional development. Literature showed a strong evidence of the increased access to the Internet by nurses to retrieve information related to clinical practice, which in turns enhance the quality of care and communication among nurses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature.

          Reviews of how doctors and nurses search for online information are relatively rare, particularly where research examines how they decide whether to use Internet-based resources. Original research into their online searching behaviour is also rare, particularly in real world clinical settings. as is original research into their online searching behaviour. This review collates some of the existing evidence, from 1995 to 2009. To establish whether there are any significant differences in the ways and reasons why doctors and nurses seek out online information; to establish how nurses and doctors locate information online; to establish whether any conclusions can be drawn from the existing evidence that might assist health and medical libraries in supporting users. An initial scoping literature search was carried out on PubMed and CINAHL to identify existing reviews of the subject area and relevant original research between 1995 and 2009. Following refinement, further searches were carried out on Embase (Ovid), LISA and LISTA. Following the initial scoping search, two journals were identified as particularly relevant for further table of contents searching. Articles were exclused where the main focus was on patients searching for information or where the focus was the evaluation of online-based educational software or tutorials. Articles were included if they were review or meta-analysis articles, where they reported original research, and where the primary focus of the online search was for participants' ongoing Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The relevant articles are outlined, with details of numbers of participants, response rates, and the user groups. There appear to be no significant differences between the reasons why doctors and nurses seek online Internet-based evidence, or the ways in which they locate that evidence. Reasons for searching for information online are broadly the same: primarily patient care and CPD (Continuing Professional Development). The perceived barriers to accessing online information are the same in both groups. There is a lack of awareness of the library as a potential online information enabler. Libraries need to examine their policy and practice to ensure that they facilitate access to online evidence-based information, particularly where users are geographically remote or based in the community rather than in a hospital setting. Librarians also need to take into account the fact that medical professionals on duty may not be able to take advantage of the academic model of online information research. Further research is recommended into the difference between the idealised academic model of searching and real world practicalities; and how other user groups search, for example patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review.

            The increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) has contributed to physicians and nurses experiencing information overload. To address the problem of information overload, an assessment of the information needs of physicians and nurses will assist in understanding what they view as useful information to make patient care more efficient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The use of smartphones in clinical practice.

              The use of smartphones and applications or 'apps' in clinical practice among nurses and doctors is on the increase. This article discusses the results of a survey undertaken as part of a service improvement project to develop an 'app' for use by junior doctors. The survey asked nurses and doctors to share information about how they used their smartphones at work, what they used them for and how and if they risk assessed the apps they use. Responses from 82 nurses and 334 doctors show a high level of users of text books, formularies, clinical decision tools and calculators, with less than one quarter of these users performed any risk assessment before use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clujul Med
                Clujul Med
                CM
                Clujul Medical
                Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
                1222-2119
                2066-8872
                July 2018
                31 July 2018
                : 91
                : 3
                : 266-273
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Nursing Department, University of Jordan, School of Nursing, Jordan
                [2 ]Directorate of Quality and Inspection. Royal Medical Services, Jordan
                [3 ]Clinical Nursing Department, Princess Muna College of Nursing, Mutah University, Jordan
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: mma4jo@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                cm-91-266
                10.15386/cjmed-1024
                6082615
                30093803
                81b3ae1e-f9ed-4255-878a-7f8b3638d108
                Copyright @ 2018

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

                History
                : 15 March 2018
                : 04 May 2018
                : 05 May 2018
                Categories
                Review
                Nursing

                internet,electronic health,health-related information,nursing

                Comments

                Comment on this article