0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The incorporation of feed-use (FU) amino acids (AAs) in diets results in a reduced use of protein-rich ingredients such as soybean meal, recognized to have elevated contributions to environmental impacts. This study investigated whether the incorporation ofl-lysine.HCl,l-threonine and FU-methionine reduces the environmental impacts of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. The following impact categories were considered: climate change, eutrophication, acidification, terrestrial ecotoxicity, cumulative energy demand and land occupation. Several feeds were formulated either to minimize the cost of the formulation (with or without AA utilization), to maximize AA incorporation (i.e. the cost of AA was considered to be similar to that of soybean meal), or to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. For both pig and broiler feeds, calculations were made first using only cereals and soybean meal as main ingredients and then using cereals and several protein-rich ingredients (soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peas). In addition, these calculations were performed using two types of soybean meal (from Brazil, associated with recent deforestation or not). For broiler feeds, two types of maize (from France, irrigated, with mineral fertilizationv. not irrigated, with animal manure fertilization) were also tested. Regarding the feeds formulated to minimize cost, incorporation of AA decreased the values for eutrophication, terrestrial ecotoxicity and cumulative energy demand of both pig and broiler feeds, regardless of the base ingredients. Reduction in climate change and acidification due to the incorporation of AA depended on the nature of the feed ingredients, with the effect of AA incorporation being greater when combined with ingredients with high impacts such as soybean meal associated with deforestation. Feeds formulated to maximize AA incorporation generally had a similar composition to those formulated to minimize cost, suggesting that the costs of AA were not the limiting factor in their incorporation. Feeds formulated to minimize greenhouse gas emissions had the lowest values for climate change and cumulative energy demand, but not for other impacts. Further research is needed to elucidate whether the incorporation of additional AA (tryptophan and valine) along withl-lysine,l-threonine and FU-methionine could decrease on the environmental impacts of pig and broiler feeds further.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Climate change and dietary choices — how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            LCA of soybean meal

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                animal
                Animal
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1751-7311
                1751-732X
                December 2011
                July 2011
                : 5
                : 12
                : 1972-1983
                Article
                10.1017/S1751731111001078
                22440474
                81b88b46-b41d-43eb-bb09-53ad8df8316e
                © 2011
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article