1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Do Contact Precautions Reduce the Incidence of Intensive Care Unit–Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections? The DPCPYO (Detection and Contact Precautions for Patients With P. aeruginosa) Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , DPCPYO Trial Group
      Clinical Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The issue of contact precautions as contributory factors for reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections in intensive care units (ICUs) remains questioned. We evaluated the impact of the addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients on incidence of ICU-acquired Pa infections.

          Methods

          In this multicenter, cluster-randomized crossover trial, 10 French ICUs were randomly assigned (1:1) to sequence 0–1 (6-month control period [CP]/3-month washout period/6-month intervention period [IP]) or sequence 1–0 (6-month IP/3-month washout period/6-month CP). A surveillance screening program for Pa was implemented. Competing-risks regression models were built with death and discharge without the occurrence of ICU-acquired Pa infection (the primary outcome) as competing events. Models were adjusted for within-ICU correlation and patient- and ICU-level covariates. The Simpson diversity index (SDI) and transmission index (TI) of Pa isolates were derived from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing.

          Results

          Within recruited ICUs, the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of ICU-acquired Pa infections were 3.38% (55/1625) versus 3.44% (57/1658) and 3.31 versus 3.52 per 1000 patient-days at risk during the CP and IP, respectively. Multivariable models indicated that the intervention did not significantly change the cumulative incidence (subdistribution hazard ratio, .91; 95% confidence interval [CI], .49–1.67; P = .76) or rate (cause-specific hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, .71–2.63; P = .36) of the primary outcome. SDI and TI did not significantly differ between CP and IP.

          Conclusions

          The addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients with a surveillance screening program does not significantly reduce ICU-acquired Pa infections in non-outbreak situations.

          Cl inical Trials Registration. ISRCTN92710225; 19 June 2020 (retrospectively registered); ISRCTN registry (http://www.isrctn.com/); DPCPYO trial: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN92710225.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity.

            An index of discrimination for typing methods is described, based on the probability of two unrelated strains being characterized as the same type. This index may be used to compare typing methods and select the most discriminatory system.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions.

              Competing risks endpoints are frequently encountered in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation where patients are exposed to relapse and treatment-related mortality. Both cause-specific hazards and direct models for the cumulative incidence functions have been used for analyzing such competing risks endpoints. For both approaches, the popular models are of a proportional hazards type. Such models have been used for studying prognostic factors in acute and chronic leukemias. We argue that a complete understanding of the event dynamics requires that both hazards and cumulative incidence be analyzed side by side, and that this is generally the most rigorous scientific approach to analyzing competing risks data. That is, understanding the effects of covariates on cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions go hand in hand. A case study illustrates our proposal. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Clinical Infectious Diseases
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                November 02 2020
                November 02 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Infection Control Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
                [2 ]UMR 6249 Chrono-Environnement, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
                [3 ]Centre d’Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses–Paris, Cimi-Paris, INSERM, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière–Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
                [4 ]Hygiène Hospitalière et Maladies Infectieuses, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Saint-Etienne, France
                [5 ]Service de Bactériologie, Virologie, et Hygiène, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Tours, France
                [6 ]Hygiène Hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, INSERM U657, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
                [7 ]Bactériologie-Hygiène, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud-Clamart, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
                Article
                10.1093/cid/ciaa1663
                82748c40-c1d0-4f03-9714-bd42e3492795
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article