46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ajdukiewicz and the Notion of Conceptual Apparatus

      1
      Academicus International Scientific Journal
      Academicus Journal

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Polish philosopher Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz adopted the notion of “conceptual apparatus”, which is very similar to the idea of “conceptual scheme” put forward by Donald Davidson, Willard V. Quine, Nicholas Rescher and others. Ajdukiewicz’s theses are, in this regard, very important although less known, and he treated cognitive processes as inseparably connected with language.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov—Warsaw School

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Philosophy and Logical Positivism

            Logical positivists claim that the whole of human knowledge can be reduced to analytic and synthetic sentences, and this means that the only possible knowledge is provided by science. Metaphysics is thus meaningless, because its sentences do not comply with the rules set forth by logical analysis of language. What, then, is the philosopher’s job? The members of the Vienna Circle answer that his task is to clarify the concepts used within empirical and formal sciences, while analytic philosophers stress instead the importance of ordinary language’s analysis. But the outcome is in both cases clear: philosophy is linguistic analysis. Howeber, by reducing the whole of reality to empirical reality, logical positivists do metaphysics. We do not have the “elimination” of metaphysics, but just the proposal of an empiricist brand of metaphysics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Quine on the Dogmas of Empiricism

              In his works the American philosopher Willard van Quine constantly rejects the analytic/synthetic distinction claiming that it is not justified. This happens because, in his opinion, human statements about the external world face the tribunal of experience not individually but as a corporate body, which implies that the judgment on their validity ultimately rests on experience itself. Many problems arise at this point, since even language plays a fundamental role in the Quinean view, and it must be accommodated into the picture if the picture itself means to be coherent. Conceptual scheme and external world are both necessary, but language does not seem to be a factor whose ultimate legitimacy relies on something outside the conceptual sphere, and this means in turn that we face a dualistic situation. Conceptual schemes or world-views, like the ones provided by Newtonian mechanics or quantum theory, are the primary bearers of truth, and the truth of a statement strictly depends from the particular conceptual scheme one currently adopts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Academicus International Scientific Journal
                Academicus Journal
                20793715
                23091088
                July 2021
                July 2021
                : 24
                : 226-229
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Genoa, Italy
                Article
                10.7336/academicus.2021.24.15
                82a713ca-c996-4ddc-b507-5a72c0d048e1
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article