Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
85
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reliable estimation of the size or density of wild animal populations is very important for effective wildlife management, conservation and ecology. Currently, the most widely used methods for obtaining such estimates involve either sighting animals from transect lines or some form of capture-recapture on marked or uniquely identifiable individuals. However, many species are difficult to sight, and cannot be easily marked or recaptured. Some of these species produce readily identifiable sounds, providing an opportunity to use passive acoustic data to estimate animal density. In addition, even for species for which other visually based methods are feasible, passive acoustic methods offer the potential for greater detection ranges in some environments (e.g. underwater or in dense forest), and hence potentially better precision. Automated data collection means that surveys can take place at times and in places where it would be too expensive or dangerous to send human observers.

          Here, we present an overview of animal density estimation using passive acoustic data, a relatively new and fast-developing field. We review the types of data and methodological approaches currently available to researchers and we provide a framework for acoustics-based density estimation, illustrated with examples from real-world case studies. We mention moving sensor platforms (e.g. towed acoustics), but then focus on methods involving sensors at fixed locations, particularly hydrophones to survey marine mammals, as acoustic-based density estimation research to date has been concentrated in this area. Primary among these are methods based on distance sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture. The methods are also applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial sound-producing taxa.

          We conclude that, despite being in its infancy, density estimation based on passive acoustic data likely will become an important method for surveying a number of diverse taxa, such as sea mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, and insects, especially in situations where inferences are required over long periods of time. There is considerable work ahead, with several potentially fruitful research areas, including the development of ( i) hardware and software for data acquisition, ( ii) efficient, calibrated, automated detection and classification systems, and ( iii) statistical approaches optimized for this application. Further, survey design will need to be developed, and research is needed on the acoustic behaviour of target species. Fundamental research on vocalization rates and group sizes, and the relation between these and other factors such as season or behaviour state, is critical. Evaluation of the methods under known density scenarios will be important for empirically validating the approaches presented here.

          Related collections

          Most cited references167

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.

            Live-trapping capture-recapture studies of animal populations with fixed trap locations inevitably have a spatial component: animals close to traps are more likely to be caught than those far away. This is not addressed in conventional closed-population estimates of abundance and without the spatial component, rigorous estimates of density cannot be obtained. We propose new, flexible capture-recapture models that use the capture locations to estimate animal locations and spatially referenced capture probability. The models are likelihood-based and hence allow use of Akaike's information criterion or other likelihood-based methods of model selection. Density is an explicit parameter, and the evaluation of its dependence on spatial or temporal covariates is therefore straightforward. Additional (nonspatial) variation in capture probability may be modeled as in conventional capture-recapture. The method is tested by simulation, using a model in which capture probability depends only on location relative to traps. Point estimators are found to be unbiased and standard error estimators almost unbiased. The method is used to estimate the density of Red-eyed Vireos (Vireo olivaceus) from mist-netting data from the Patuxent Research Refuge, Maryland, U.S.A. Estimates agree well with those from an existing spatially explicit method based on inverse prediction. A variety of additional spatially explicit models are fitted; these include models with temporal stratification, behavioral response, and heterogeneous animal home ranges.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
                Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
                brv
                Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1464-7931
                1469-185X
                May 2013
                29 November 2012
                : 88
                : 2
                : 287-309
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, Fife, KY16 9LZ, UK
                [2 ]Centro de Estatística e Aplicações da Universidade de Lisboa Bloco C6, Piso 4, 1749-016, Lisboa, Portugal
                [3 ]Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific 53560 Hull Street, San Diego, CA, 92152, USA
                [4 ]Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University and NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory 2030 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR, 97365, USA
                [5 ]Naval Undersea Warfare Center 1176 Howell Street, Newport, RI, 02841, USA
                [6 ]Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
                Author notes
                * Address for correspondence (Tel: 00441334461801; Fax: 00441334461842; E-mail: tiago@ 123456mcs.st-and.ac.uk ).
                Article
                10.1111/brv.12001
                3743169
                23190144
                835ead3e-ee2a-43ef-ac29-74870e497d5b
                Biological Reviews © 2013 Cambridge Philosophical Society

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 17 May 2012
                : 19 October 2012
                : 25 October 2012
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Ecology
                acoustic surveys,bioacoustics,density estimation,distance sampling,passive acoustic monitoring,spatially explicit capture-recapture,fixed sensors,hydrophones

                Comments

                Comment on this article