22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validity and reliability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ): experience from Kuwait using a sample of women with breast cancer

      brief-report
      a , b
      Annals of Saudi Medicine
      Medknow Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

          Although the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast-specific module (BR-23) are widely used instruments, the few reports on their psychometric characteristics from Arab and neighboring countries involved limited analyses. Our objective was to assess the psychometric characteristics of both questionnaires using the responses of a larger sample of Arab women.

          METHODS:

          Participants were consecutive clinic attendees at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center. The indices assessed were alpha coefficients, item-internal consistency (IIC), item-discriminant validity (IDV), and known-groups validity.

          RESULTS:

          The 348 women were aged 48.3 (10.3) years. The intra-class correlation for the test-retest statistic and the internal consistency values for the multi-item scales were >0.7 alpha. With the exception of the pain subscale, all items met the IIC criterion of >0.4 correlation with the corresponding scale. For IDV, the BR-23 performed better than the QLQ-C30. The scale scores discriminated between patients at different disease stages, and between sick and well populations.

          CONCLUSION:

          With the exception of the pain subscale, the Arabic version of the questionnaires is psychometrically sound.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment.

          Following the translation development stage, the second research stage of the IQOLA Project tests the assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction. This article provides detailed information on the research methods used by the IQOLA Project to evaluate data quality, scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability of the SF-36 scales. Tests include evaluation of item and scale-level descriptive statistics; examination of the equality of item-scale correlations, item internal consistency and item discriminant validity; and estimation of scale score reliability using internal consistency and test-retest methods. Results from these tests are used to determine if standard algorithms for the construction and scoring of the eight SF-36 scales can be used in each country and to provide information that can be used in translation improvement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy.

            The EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is designed to measure cancer patients' physical, psychological and social functions. The questionnaire is composed of multi-item scales and single items. 247 patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 before palliative radiotherapy and 181 after palliative radiotherapy. The questionnaire was well accepted with a high completion rate in the present patient population consisting of advanced cancer patients with short life expectancy. In addition, the questionnaire was found to be useful to detect the effect of palliative radiotherapy over time. The scale reliability was excellent for all scales except the role functioning scale. Excellent criterion validity was found for the emotional functioning scale where it was correlated with GHQ-20. Performance of the questionnaire was improved after the second evaluation as compared with the first. The present study shows that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is found to be practical and valid in measuring quality of life in patients with advanced disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The reliability and validity of the short version of the WHO Quality of Life Instrument in an Arab general population

              BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is rising interest in quality of life (QOL) research in Arabian countries. The aim of this study was to assess in a nationwide sample of Kuwaiti subjects the reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), a shorter version of the widely used QOL assessment instrument that comprises 26 items in the domains of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and the environment. METHODS: A one-in-three systematic random proportionate sample of consenting Kuwaiti nationals attending large cooperative stores and municipal government offices in the six governorates completed the Arabic translation of the questionnaire. The indices assessed included test-retest reliability, internal consistency, item internal consistency (IIC), item discriminant validity (IDV), known-groups and construct validity. RESULTS: There were 3303 participants (44.8% males, 55.2% females, mean age 35.4 years, range 16 to 87 years). The intra-class correlation for the test-retest statistic and the internal consistency values for the full questionnaire and the domains had a Cronbach's alpha≥0.7. Of the 24 items that constitute the domains, 21 met the IIC requirement of correlation ≥0.4 with the corresponding domain, while 16 met the IDV criterion of having a higher correlation with their corresponding domain than other domains. Domain scores discriminated significantly between well and sick groups. In the factor analysis, four strong factors emerged with the same construct as in the WHO report. CONCLUSION: The Arabic translation of the WHOQOL-BREF has impressive reliability and validity indices. The poor IDV findings are due to the multidimensional nature of the questionnaire. The highly significant validity indices should reassure researchers that the questionnaire represents the same constructs across cultures. Negatively worded items possibly need refinement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Saudi Med
                ASM
                Annals of Saudi Medicine
                Medknow Publications (India )
                0256-4947
                0975-4466
                Sep-Oct 2010
                : 30
                : 5
                : 390-396
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait
                [b ]Department of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine Hospital, Safat, Kuwait
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jude U. Ohaeri, MD · Department of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine Hospital, Gamal Abdul Naser Road, PO Box 4081, Safat, Kuwait 13041 · T/F: +965-2-489-9315 · judeohaeri@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                ASM-30-390
                10.4103/0256-4947.67083
                2941253
                20697165
                85e08e57-d97b-417d-91c4-976201f75dfe
                © Annals of Saudi Medicine

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : October 2009
                Categories
                Brief Report

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article