5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      7 Failure Rates during Reuse of Disposable N95 Masks in Clinical Practice in the Emergency Department

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic caused a worldwide shortage of personal protective equipment, specifically disposable N95 respirators, prompting health care entities to extend the use of these masks beyond their intended single-use manufacturer recommendation with a paucity of supporting research. We sought to explore the failure rate when reusing single-use N95 respirators through repeated fit testing in an emergency department (ED). Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of ED personnel (“subjects”) required to use respirators at an academic, level one trauma center. All investigators performing fit testing reviewed OSHA qualitative fit test guidelines and training and were familiar with the testing protocol. All subjects had been previously fit tested and assigned an appropriately sized N95 mask by employee health per hospital protocol. Subjects who failed initial fit testing and those who declined to participate were excluded. Per study protocol, subjects were fit tested periodically throughout their shifts and on multiple shifts over the 8-week study period. Data points collected included the age of the mask, subjective assessment of mask seal quality, and fit test results. The data was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, and odds ratios were calculated to determine the failure rate of disposable N95 masks following reuse. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Results One hundred thirteen disposable N95 masks were evaluated. Twenty-eight masks were in their first day of use (3 failures), 29 were in their 2nd day of use (2 failures), 26 were in their 3rd day of use (9 failures), 11 were in their 4th day of use (5 failures) and 21 were in their 5th or greater day of use (10 failures). Categorizing the masks into those being used for 2 or fewer days versus those being used for 3 or more, the odds ratio for mask failure with an older mask was 7.1 (confidence interval 2.5-20, p<0.0001), with younger masks failing 9% of the time and older masks failing 41% of the time. Conclusion Disposable N95 masks have significant failure rates following reuse in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ann Emerg Med
          Ann Emerg Med
          Annals of Emergency Medicine
          Published by Mosby, Inc.
          0196-0644
          1097-6760
          29 October 2020
          October 2020
          29 October 2020
          : 76
          : 4
          : S3-S4
          Affiliations
          [1]St. Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
          [2]St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA
          Article
          S0196-0644(20)30764-2
          10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.017
          7598892
          85f7bfdb-ad03-45f1-925f-578b8df8c14e
          Copyright © 2020 Published by Mosby, Inc.

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          Categories
          Research Forum Abstract

          Emergency medicine & Trauma
          Emergency medicine & Trauma

          Comments

          Comment on this article