Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and inhaled sedation in coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and the primary cause of death in the current pandemic. Critically ill patients often undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy as the last resort over an extended period. ECMO therapy requires sedation of the patient, which is usually achieved by intravenous administration of sedatives. The shortage of intravenous sedative drugs due to the ongoing pandemic, and attempts to improve treatment outcome for COVID-19 patients, drove the application of inhaled sedation as a promising alternative for sedation during ECMO therapy. Administration of volatile anesthetics requires an appropriate delivery. Commercially available ones are the anesthetic gas reflection systems AnaConDa ® and MIRUS TM, and each should be combined with a gas scavenging system. In this review, we describe respiratory management in COVID-19 patients and the procedures for inhaled sedation during ECMO therapy of COVID-19 related ARDS. We focus particularly on the technical details of administration of volatile anesthetics. Furthermore, we describe the advantages of inhaled sedation and volatile anesthetics, and we discuss the limitations as well as the requirements for safe application in the clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation

          Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced infection can be associated with a coagulopathy, findings consistent with infection-induced inflammatory changes as observed in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). The lack of prior immunity to COVID-19 has resulted in large numbers of infected patients across the globe and uncertainty regarding management of the complications that arise in the course of this viral illness. The lungs are the target organ for COVID-19; patients develop acute lung injury that can progress to respiratory failure, although multiorgan failure can also occur. The initial coagulopathy of COVID-19 presents with prominent elevation of D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen-degradation products, whereas abnormalities in prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet counts are relatively uncommon in initial presentations. Coagulation test screening, including the measurement of D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, is suggested. COVID-19–associated coagulopathy should be managed as it would be for any critically ill patient, following the established practice of using thromboembolic prophylaxis for critically ill hospitalized patients, and standard supportive care measures for those with sepsis-induced coagulopathy or DIC. Although D-dimer, sepsis physiology, and consumptive coagulopathy are indicators of mortality, current data do not suggest the use of full-intensity anticoagulation doses unless otherwise clinically indicated. Even though there is an associated coagulopathy with COVID-19, bleeding manifestations, even in those with DIC, have not been reported. If bleeding does occur, standard guidelines for the management of DIC and bleeding should be followed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry

            Background Multiple major health organisations recommend the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, initial reports of ECMO use in patients with COVID-19 described very high mortality and there have been no large, international cohort studies of ECMO for COVID-19 reported to date. Methods We used data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry to characterise the epidemiology, hospital course, and outcomes of patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed COVID-19 who had ECMO support initiated between Jan 16 and May 1, 2020, at 213 hospitals in 36 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital death in a time-to-event analysis assessed at 90 days after ECMO initiation. We applied a multivariable Cox model to examine whether patient and hospital factors were associated with in-hospital mortality. Findings Data for 1035 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support were included in this study. Of these, 67 (6%) remained hospitalised, 311 (30%) were discharged home or to an acute rehabilitation centre, 101 (10%) were discharged to a long-term acute care centre or unspecified location, 176 (17%) were discharged to another hospital, and 380 (37%) died. The estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 37·4% (95% CI 34·4–40·4). Mortality was 39% (380 of 968) in patients with a final disposition of death or hospital discharge. The use of ECMO for circulatory support was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·20–2·97). In the subset of patients with COVID-19 receiving respiratory (venovenous) ECMO and characterised as having acute respiratory distress syndrome, the estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 38·0% (95% CI 34·6–41·5). Interpretation In patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO, both estimated mortality 90 days after ECMO and mortality in those with a final disposition of death or discharge were less than 40%. These data from 213 hospitals worldwide provide a generalisable estimate of ECMO mortality in the setting of COVID-19. Funding None.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The COVID-19 Pandemic and the $16 Trillion Virus

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Crit Care Med
                WJCCM
                World Journal of Critical Care Medicine
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2220-3141
                9 November 2021
                9 November 2021
                : 10
                : 6
                : 323-333
                Affiliations
                Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany. martin.bellgardt@ 123456rub.de
                Chemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8093, Switzerland
                Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
                General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
                Internal Medicine/Intensive Care, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
                Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
                Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum 44791, Germany
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Bellgardt M designed and conceptualized this work; Bellgardt M, Özcelik D, and Herzog-Niescery J conducted the literature review and information retrieval and contributed to critical revision for important intellectual content; All authors wrote, read, and approved the final manuscript.

                Corresponding author: Martin Bellgardt, MD, Academic Research, Senior Scientist, Staff Physician, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital of Ruhr-University of Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, Bochum 44791, Germany. martin.bellgardt@ 123456rub.de

                Article
                jWJCCM.v10.i6.pg323
                10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.323
                8613718
                34888158
                86763227-d993-42a9-98db-d2823568bbd2
                ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 8 March 2021
                : 24 May 2021
                : 23 August 2021
                Categories
                Minireviews

                extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,covid-19,acute respiratory distress syndrome,critical care,volatile anesthetics,inhaled sedation

                Comments

                Comment on this article