12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Groin hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed globally, with more than 20 million procedures per year. The last guidelines on groin hernia management were published in 2018 by the HerniaSurge Group. The aim of this project was to assess new evidence and update the guidelines. The guideline is intended for general and abdominal wall surgeons treating adult patients with groin hernias.

          Method

          A working group of 30 international groin hernia experts and all involved stakeholders was formed and examined all new literature on groin hernia management, available until April 2022. Articles were screened for eligibility and assessed according to GRADE methodologies. New evidence was included, and chapters were rewritten. Statements and recommendations were updated or newly formulated as necessary.

          Results

          Ten chapters of the original HerniaSurge inguinal hernia guidelines were updated. In total, 39 new statements and 32 recommendations were formulated (16 strong recommendations). A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus on all statements and recommendations among the groin hernia experts and at the European Hernia Society meeting in Manchester on October 21, 2022.

          Conclusion

          The HerniaSurge Collaboration has updated the international guidelines for groin hernia management. The updated guidelines provide an overview of the best available evidence on groin hernia management and include evidence-based statements and recommendations for daily practice. Future guideline development will change according to emerging guideline methodology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references218

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

          Background Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filtering of searches is time consuming, and no single method fulfills the principal requirements of speed with accuracy. Automation of systematic reviews is driven by a necessity to expedite the availability of current best evidence for policy and clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org), a free web and mobile app, that helps expedite the initial screening of abstracts and titles using a process of semi-automation while incorporating a high level of usability. For the beta testing phase, we used two published Cochrane reviews in which included studies had been selected manually. Their searches, with 1030 records and 273 records, were uploaded to Rayyan. Different features of Rayyan were tested using these two reviews. We also conducted a survey of Rayyan’s users and collected feedback through a built-in feature. Results Pilot testing of Rayyan focused on usability, accuracy against manual methods, and the added value of the prediction feature. The “taster” review (273 records) allowed a quick overview of Rayyan for early comments on usability. The second review (1030 records) required several iterations to identify the previously identified 11 trials. The “suggestions” and “hints,” based on the “prediction model,” appeared as testing progressed beyond five included studies. Post rollout user experiences and a reflexive response by the developers enabled real-time modifications and improvements. The survey respondents reported 40% average time savings when using Rayyan compared to others tools, with 34% of the respondents reporting more than 50% time savings. In addition, around 75% of the respondents mentioned that screening and labeling studies as well as collaborating on reviews to be the two most important features of Rayyan. As of November 2016, Rayyan users exceed 2000 from over 60 countries conducting hundreds of reviews totaling more than 1.6M citations. Feedback from users, obtained mostly through the app web site and a recent survey, has highlighted the ease in exploration of searches, the time saved, and simplicity in sharing and comparing include-exclude decisions. The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users. Conclusions Rayyan is responsive and intuitive in use with significant potential to lighten the load of reviewers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain.

              Nociceptive and neuropathic components both contribute to pain. Since these components require different pain management strategies, correct pain diagnosis before and during treatment is highly desirable. As low back pain (LBP) patients constitute an important subgroup of chronic pain patients, we addressed the following issues: (i) to establish a simple, validated screening tool to detect neuropathic pain (NeP) components in chronic LBP patients, (ii) to determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain components in LBP in a large-scale survey, and (iii) to determine whether LBP patients with an NeP component suffer from worse, or different, co-morbidities. In co-operation with the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain we developed and validated the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) in a prospective, multicentre study and subsequently applied it to approximately 8000 LBP patients. The PD-Q is a reliable screening tool with high sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive accuracy; these were 84% in a palm-top computerised version and 85%, 80% and 83%, respectively, in a corresponding pencil-and-paper questionnaire. In an unselected cohort of chronic LBP patients, 37% were found to have predominantly neuropathic pain. Patients with NeP showed higher ratings of pain intensity, with more (and more severe) co-morbidities such as depression, panic/anxiety and sleep disorders. This also affected functionality and use of health-care resources. On the basis of given prevalence of LBP in the general population, we calculated that 14.5% of all female and 11.4% of all male Germans suffer from LBP with a predominant neuropathic pain component. Simple, patient-based, easy-to-use screening questionnaires can determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain components both in individual LBP patients and in heterogeneous cohorts of such patients. Since NeP correlates with more intense pain, more severe co-morbidity and poorer quality of life, accurate diagnosis is a milestone in choosing appropriate therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BJS Open
                BJS Open
                bjsopen
                BJS Open
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2474-9842
                October 2023
                20 October 2023
                20 October 2023
                : 7
                : 5
                : zrad080
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery (DISC), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
                Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
                Department of Anaesthesiology, The Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Department of Surgery, Vittorio Veneto General Hospital , Vittorio Veneto, Italy
                Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital , Arnhem, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ghent , Ghent, Belgium
                Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, California, USA
                Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                Department of Surgery, Fakultní Nemocnice v Motole , Prague, Czech Republic
                Department of Surgery, Universitat Ramon Llull , Barcelona, Spain
                Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital–Herlev and Gentofte , Herlev, Denmark
                Vivantes Hospital Berlin, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité University Medicine , Berlin, Germany
                Department of Surgery, Klinik Im Park, Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                SolviMáx Centre of Excellence for Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain , Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                Department of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Center , Veldhoven, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron , Barcelona, Spain
                Department of Surgery, Hernia Center 3+CHIRURGEN , Berlin, Germany
                Department of Surgery, KU Leuven–University Hospital Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital , Malmö, Sweden
                Department of Surgery, Universidad de Sevilla , Sevilla, Spain
                Department of Surgery, Derriford Hospital Plymouth , Plymouth, UK
                North Devon Comprehensive Hernia Centre, North Devon District Hospital, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust , Barnstaple, UK
                Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari , Cagliari, Italy
                Department of Surgery, Gross-Sand Hospital Hamburg , Hamburg, Germany
                North Devon Comprehensive Hernia Centre, North Devon District Hospital, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust , Barnstaple, UK
                Department of Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Montebelluna , Montebelluna, Italy
                Westmead Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney , New Galles, Australia
                Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron , Barcelona, Spain
                Department of Surgery, Bodden-Kliniken Ribnitz-Damgarten GmbH , Ribnitz-Damgarten, Germany
                Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, P.M.B. , Kumasi, West Africa
                SolviMáx Centre of Excellence for Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain , Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                Department of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Center , Veldhoven, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Cesare Stabilini, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy (e-mail: cesarestabil@ 123456hotmail.com )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-0352
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7131-2461
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-5345
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-1747
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1805-9866
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-7322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-0756
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7047-6114
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-0717
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-5621
                Article
                zrad080
                10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080
                10588975
                37862616
                86764875-b571-4169-bf47-31c477e1b5b7
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 February 2023
                : 05 July 2023
                : 16 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 38
                Funding
                Funded by: European Hernia Society (EHS);
                Categories
                Guideline
                AcademicSubjects/MED00910
                Bjs/13
                Bjs/2

                Comments

                Comment on this article