13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of positron emission tomography on strategy in liver resection for primary and secondary liver tumors.

      Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
      Adenoma, Liver Cell, pathology, radionuclide imaging, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, secondary, Colorectal Neoplasms, Female, Fluorine Radioisotopes, diagnostic use, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Neoplasm Staging, methods, Radiopharmaceuticals, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, Emission-Computed

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Outcome of patients with metastatic disease mainly depends on accurate preoperative tumor staging. 18[F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-PET) has been proven to be a valuable diagnostic tool in a number of different tumors but its direct influence on liver surgery has not been thoroughly investigated. Between July 1999 and March 2000, 50 consecutive patients with 174 suspected liver lesions were admitted to the University Hospital Jena. All 50 patients underwent abdominal ultrasound, CT-scan, and 18-FDG positron emission tomography scanning. In 23 patients the diagnostic work-up was completed by MRI scan. Altogether there were a total of 174 histologically proven intrahepatic lesions, nine of which were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of PET for all hepatic lesions was 82%, 25%, and 96% compared with 63%, 50%, and 96% for abdominal ultrasound, 71%, 50%, and 97% for CT-scan, and 83%, 57%, and 97% for MRI-scan. In 23 of 50 patients 24 extrahepatic lesions were identified. In these patients the sensitivity and specificity of PET-compared to abdominal ultrasound, CT-scan, and MRI-scan for all extrahepatic lesions-was 63% and 60%, 29% and 25%, 47% and 50% and 40% and 50%, respectively. The findings on PET scan had a direct impact on operative management in nine patients (18%). Our series demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of primary and secondary liver lesions which is superior to ultrasound and CT scan but not to MRI scan. The main value of PET scan consists in the detection of extrahepatic tumor (64%). Due to better detection of extrahepatic tumor, FDG-PET is a very useful addition to the currently used anatomically-based images in all cases of advanced tumor spread with high risk of extrahepatic tumor. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article