4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Implementation and Evaluation of an IPAC SWAT Team Mobilized to Long-Term Care and Retirement Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pragmatic Health System Innovation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Long-term care facilities (LTCFs), retirement homes (RHs), and other congregate care settings in Canada and worldwide have experienced significant COVID-19 outbreaks. As a health system response, our acute care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, developed and mobilized an onsite Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) SWAT team (IPAC-SWAT) to regional settings on outbreak and implemented a strategy of support through education, training, and engagement.

          Between April 28, 2020, and June 30, 2020, IPAC-SWAT assessed 7 LTCFs and 10 RHs for IPAC preparedness and actively managed 10 of 13 COVID-19 outbreaks (LTCF n=5; RH n=5). IPAC-SWAT strategies were multi-interventional and intended to mitigate further viral transmission or prevent outbreaks. Dedicated training of local “IPAC champions” was facilitated at 7 sites (LTCF = 5; RH = 2) using a “train-the-trainer” approach to promote local knowledge, autonomy, and site-led audits and feedback.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a Long-Term Care Facility in King County, Washington

          Abstract Background Long-term care facilities are high-risk settings for severe outcomes from outbreaks of Covid-19, owing to both the advanced age and frequent chronic underlying health conditions of the residents and the movement of health care personnel among facilities in a region. Methods After identification on February 28, 2020, of a confirmed case of Covid-19 in a skilled nursing facility in King County, Washington, Public Health–Seattle and King County, aided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, launched a case investigation, contact tracing, quarantine of exposed persons, isolation of confirmed and suspected cases, and on-site enhancement of infection prevention and control. Results As of March 18, a total of 167 confirmed cases of Covid-19 affecting 101 residents, 50 health care personnel, and 16 visitors were found to be epidemiologically linked to the facility. Most cases among residents included respiratory illness consistent with Covid-19; however, in 7 residents no symptoms were documented. Hospitalization rates for facility residents, visitors, and staff were 54.5%, 50.0%, and 6.0%, respectively. The case fatality rate for residents was 33.7% (34 of 101). As of March 18, a total of 30 long-term care facilities with at least one confirmed case of Covid-19 had been identified in King County. Conclusions In the context of rapidly escalating Covid-19 outbreaks, proactive steps by long-term care facilities to identify and exclude potentially infected staff and visitors, actively monitor for potentially infected patients, and implement appropriate infection prevention and control measures are needed to prevent the introduction of Covid-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            COVID ‐19 infections and deaths among Connecticut nursing home residents: facility correlates

            Abstract Objective To determine the associations of nursing home registered nurse (RN) staffing, overall quality of care, and concentration of Medicaid or racial and ethnic minority residents with COVID‐19 confirmed cases and deaths by April 16, 2020 among Connecticut nursing home residents. Design Cross‐sectional analysis on Connecticut nursing home (n=215) COVID‐19 report, linked to other nursing home files and county counts of confirmed cases and deaths. Multivariable two‐part models determined the associations of key nursing home characteristics with the likelihood of at least 1 confirmed case (or death) in the facility, and with the count of cases (deaths) among facilities with at least 1 confirmed case (death). Results The average number of confirmed cases was 8 per nursing home (zero in 107 facilities), and the average number of confirmed deaths was 1.7 per nursing home (zero in 131 facilities). Among facilities with at least 1 confirmed case, every 20 minutes (per resident day) increase in RN staffing was associated with 22% fewer confirmed cases (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68‐0.89, p<0.001); compared to 1‐ to 3‐star facilities, 4‐ or 5‐star facilities had 13% fewer confirmed cases (IRR=0.87, 95% CI 0.78‐0.97, p<0.015); and facilities with high concentration of Medicaid residents (IRR=1.16, 95% CI 1.02‐1.32, p=0.025) or racial/ethnic minority residents (IRR=1.15, 95% CI 1.03‐1.29, p=0.026) had 16% and 15% more confirmed cases, respectively, than their counterparts. Among facilities with at least 1 death, every 20 minutes increase in RN staffing significantly predicted 26% fewer COVID‐19 deaths (IRR=0.74, 95% CI 0.55‐1.00, p=0.047). Other focused characteristics did not show statistically significant associations with deaths. Conclusions Nursing homes with higher RN staffing and quality ratings have the potential to better control the spread of the novel coronavirus and reduce deaths. Nursing homes caring predominantly for Medicaid or racial and ethnic minority residents tend to have more confirmed cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              COVID ‐19 Preparedness in Nursing Homes in the Midst of the Pandemic

              Nursing homes (NHs) are considered hotspots for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19),1, 2 given their residential environments and patient vulnerabilities.3, 4 We describe the COVID‐19 preparedness of NHs across the nation. METHODS We used a convenience sample of NHs with available email addresses drawn from national surveys conducted in 2013 and 20175, 6 (N = 942). We used Qualtrics software to email a 30‐item survey on March 30, 2020. After two reminder emails, we closed the survey on April 5, 2020. RESULTS Fifty‐six NHs responded nationwide, including respondents from 29 states: Midwest (30%), West (25%), Northeast (23%), and South (22%). Most were for profit (68%), with fewer nonprofit (27%) and government owned (5%). Some (38%) were part of a chain. The sample distribution by ownership was similar to the nation. By region, the Northeast and West, two of the regions hit hard and early by COVID‐19, were overrepresented. Nationally, 58% were part of a NH chain (Table 1). Table 1 Nursing Home Characteristics, by Survey Sample and the Nation Survey Sample, National Sample, Characteristic % % Regiona Midwest 30.36 32.85 Northeast 23.21 16.55 South 21.43 35.21 West 25.00 15.39 Ownershipa For profit 67.86 70.07 Government 5.36 6.49 Nonprofit 26.79 23.44 Chain facilityb 37.50 58.30 aRegion and ownership at the national level were calculated from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Nursing Home Compare data, updated March 31, 2020. Accessed on April 17, 2020. https://data.medicare.gov/Nursing-Home-Compare/Provider-Info/4pq5-n9py. bChain management at the national level was calculated from 2017 Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports. Accessed on April 17, 2020. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/NursingHomeQualityInits/Skilled-Nursing-Facility-Quality-Reporting-Program/SNF-Quality-Reporting-Program-Public-Reporting. Guidance and Preparedness On average, NHs used two to five guidance documents for COVID‐19. The most common were: Center for Disease Control and Prevention (88%), state or local health departments (84%), corporate (53%), World Health Organization (48%), local hospital/healthcare organization (39%), and the Association for Professionals in Infection Prevention and Epidemiology (27%). Staff responsible for preparedness most often included infection preventionists (39%), directors of nursing (32%), and administrators (27%). Slightly more than half of NHS (54%) had separate COVID‐19 plans, and others included COVID‐19 in their current disaster preparedness plan (46%). All had: plans for training staff to address COVID‐19 (100%), processes to limit/restrict visitors (100%) and outside vendors/consultants (100%), policies regarding ill employees returning to work (100%), and guidance for employees regarding COVID‐19 outbreak (100%). Almost all (96%) had policies for screening visitors. Some (29%) conducted COVID‐19 outbreak simulations. NHs reported clear lines of communication and relationships with hospitals. Most (68%) indicated they had a local referral hospital accepting their patients under investigation for COVID‐19. Most indicated clear lines of communication with public health officials (96%) and nearby hospitals (87%) regarding their role in containing/managing the pandemic. One‐fourth (25%) indicated they were counted on as an alternative care site for hospitalized COVID‐19 patients, and more than three‐fourths (79%) were accepting non–COVID‐19 patients as hospital overflow. Few (18%) planned to discharge residents to free beds for hospital patients. Testing, Supplies, and Staffing Two‐thirds reported access to COVID‐19 testing (66%), with testing available for patients (100%) and some staff (53%). Nearly three‐fourths (72%), however, reported having inadequate supplies. Among those were N‐95 respirators (90%), gowns (90%), face guards/eye protection (88%), alcohol‐based sanitizer (67%), surgical masks (64%), and gloves (39%). Five‐sixths (83%) expected significant staff shortages. Common strategies to address staff shortages included having staff volunteer for extended hours (55%) and nonclinical staff filling different roles (45%). Less common were using contracted/agency staff (19%) and mandating extended hours (16%). When asked their greatest COVID‐19 preparedness concern, administrators cited lack of supplies (43%), staff shortage (34%), and resident health and safety (14%). Equipment concerns typically related to availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (29%), including N‐95 masks and respirators, face shields, and plastic zipper tents. One administrator lamented, “Not having enough PPE to keep up with a COVID‐19 outbreak and sufficient staffing if staff become ill.” Another noted, “Not enough available supplies for staff, such as an N‐95 masks or respirators or face shields; now we are using cotton‐made face masks and…sanitary pads as an additional barrier.” Staff shortages focused on licensed staff. One cited, “Licensed staffing availability, specifically RN/LPN [registered nurse/licensed practical nurse] are hard to recruit in our market. We have plenty of nonlicensed staff.” Another cited, “Not enough staff to deal with the increased needs of patient[s].” Financial Effects Few NHs indicated the COVID‐19 financial impact was unknown (14%) or nil (13%). Most indicated increased costs for supplies (58%) and employee hours (38%), or fewer admissions (27%). One administrator said, “Employee fears are affecting call‐ins and the ability to replace staff on the floor, resulting in increased overtime.” Another noted “social distance” requirements meant more staff time was needed to serve meals. Several noted postponement of elective surgeries led to fewer admissions for postsurgery rehabilitation. DISCUSSION NHs are having trouble responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, despite Medicare and Medicaid changes that have recently increased infection prevention infrastructure. 7 Our national results are similar to a survey of Michigan NHs, 8 demonstrating the extent of this problem. Our small sample means we can only offer descriptive results. Nevertheless, our results do indicate the need for NHs to continue refining their preparedness strategies in response to local virus prevalence, resident population, and local regulations, including state policies on accepting COVID‐19 patients discharged from hospitals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Med Dir Assoc
                J Am Med Dir Assoc
                Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
                AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
                1525-8610
                1538-9375
                3 January 2021
                February 2021
                3 January 2021
                : 22
                : 2
                : 253-255.e1
                Affiliations
                [1]North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                []Address correspondence to Michael J. Lamb, MBBS, North York General Hospital, 804-18 Kenaston Gardens, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2K3C7.
                Article
                S1525-8610(20)31019-7
                10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.033
                7833812
                33406385
                87dd84f0-0cbf-4af2-ba9f-b2bb11cc614b
                © 2020 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Pragmatic Innovations in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine
                Feasible New, Practical Products or Approaches Intended to Improve Outcomes or Processes in Post-Acute or Long-Term Care

                ipac,covid-19,coronavirus,long-term care,outbreak,champion
                ipac, covid-19, coronavirus, long-term care, outbreak, champion

                Comments

                Comment on this article