38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Influence of Curing Light Attenuation Caused by Aesthetic Indirect Restorative Materials on Resin Cement Polymerization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          To verify the effect of interposing different indirect restorative materials on degree of conversion (DC), hardness, and flexural strength of a dual-cure resin cement.

          Methods:

          Discs (2 mm-thick, n=5) of four indirect restorative materials were manufactured: a layered glass-ceramic (GC); a heat-pressed lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramic veneered with the layered glass-ceramic (LD); a micro-hybrid (MH); and a micro-filled (MF) indirect composite resin. The light transmittance of these materials was determined using a double-beam spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere. Bar-shaped specimens of a dual-cure resin cement (Nexus 2/SDS Kerr), with (dual-cure mode) and without the catalyst paste (light-cure mode), were photoactivated through the discs using either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or a light-emitting diode (LED) unit. As a control, specimens were photoactivated without the interposed discs. Specimens were stored at 37ºC for 24h before being submitted to FT-Raman spectrometry (n=3), Knoop microhardness (n=6) and three-point bending (n=6) tests. Data were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey’s test (α=0.05).

          Results:

          MH presented the highest transmittance. The DC was lower in light-cure mode than in dual-cure mode. All restorative materials reduced the cement microhardness in light-cure mode. GC and LD with QTH and GC with LED decreased the strength of the cement for both activation modes compared to the controls. Curing units did not affect DC or microhardness, except when the dual-cure cement was photoactivated through LD (LED>QTH). Flexural strength was higher with QTH compared to LED.

          Conclusions:

          Differences in transmittance among the restorative materials significantly influenced cement DC and flexural strength, regardless of the activation mode, as well as the microhardness of the resin cement tested in light-cure mode. Microhardness was not impaired by the interposed materials when the resin cement was used in dual-cure mode.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature.

          The practice of fixed prosthodontic has changed dramatically with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials. Adhesive resin systems are examples of these changes that have led to the popularity of bonded ceramics and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. Today's dentist has the choice of a water-based luting agent (zinc phosphate, zinc polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, or reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol) or a resin system with or without an adhesive. Recent formulations of glass ionomer luting agents include resin components (resin-modified glass ionomers), which are increasingly popular in clinical practice. This review summarizes the research on these systems with the goal of providing information that will help the reader choose the most suitable material. The scientific studies have been evaluated in relation to the following categories: (1) biocompatibility, (2) caries or plaque inhibition, (3) microleakage, (4) strength and other mechanical properties, (5) solubility, (6) water sorption, (7) adhesion, (8) setting stresses, (9) wear resistance, (10) color stability, (11) radiopacity, (12) film thickness or viscosity, and (13) working and setting times. In addition, guidelines on luting-agent manipulation are related to available literature and include: (1) temporary cement removal, (2) smear layer removal, (3) powder/liquid ratio, (4) mixing temperature and speed, (5) seating force and vibration, and (6) moisture control. Tables of available products and their properties are also presented together with current recommendations by the authors with a rationale.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials.

            All-ceramic restorations have been advocated for superior esthetics. Various materials have been used to improve ceramic core strength, but it is unclear whether they affect the opacity of all-ceramic systems. This study compared the translucency of 6 all-ceramic system core materials at clinically appropriate thicknesses. Disc specimens 13 mm in diameter and 0.49 +/- 0.01 mm in thickness were fabricated from the following materials (n = 5 per group): IPS Empress dentin, IPS Empress 2 dentin, In-Ceram Alumina core, In-Ceram Spinell core, In-Ceram Zirconia core, and Procera AllCeram core. Empress and Empress 2 dentin specimens also were fabricated and tested at a thickness of 0.77 +/- 0.02 mm (the manufacturer's recommended core thickness is 0.8 mm). A high-noble metal-ceramic alloy (Porc. 52 SF) served as the control, and Vitadur Alpha opaque dentin was used as a standard. Sample reflectance (ratio of the intensity of reflected light to that of the incident light) was measured with an integrating sphere attached to a spectrophotometer across the visible spectrum (380 to 700 nm); 0-degree illumination and diffuse viewing geometry were used. Contrast ratios were calculated from the luminous reflectance (Y) of the specimens with a black (Yb) and a white (Yw) backing to give Yb/Yw with CIE illuminant D65 and a 2-degree observer function (0.0 = transparent, 1.0 = opaque). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple-comparison test were used to analyze the data (P In-Ceram Spinell > Empress, Procera, Empress 2 > In-Ceram Alumina > In-Ceram Zirconia, 52 SF alloy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents.

              New luting agents, particularly with adhesive capability, are being introduced in an attempt to improve clinical success. Independent studies of basic comparative data are necessary to characterize these materials in relation to mechanical and physical properties. The purpose of this study was to compare the flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and radiopacity and pH of representatives of 5 types (categories) of luting agents. The luting agents included a zinc phosphate, a conventional and a resin-modified glass ionomer, 2 dual-polymerizing resins ("photopolymerized" after mixing and "unphotopolymerized" conditions), and an auto-polymerizing resin. The specimens were prepared and the testing was conducted by 1 person to maximize standardization. Flexural strength (MPa) and modulus of elasticity (GPa) were determined on bar-shaped specimens (2 x 2 x 20 mm) at 24 hours and 3 months (n = 8). Radiopacity (mm Al) was measured by exposing 1 mm thick specimens along with an aluminum step wedge (n = 4). pH was measured using a pH electrode immediately after mixing; at 1, 5, 15, 30 minutes; and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours (n = 4). The data were subjected to statistical analyses with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05). The resin luting agents (64 to 97 MPa) showed higher flexural strength than all other materials tested (7 to 27 MPa), with the "photopolymerized" (83 to 97 MPa) conditions higher than "unphotopolymerized" (64 to 81 MPa) (P<.0005). Zinc phosphate was the most radiopaque (6.4 mm Al) (P<.0001) and provided the highest rigidity (9.2 GPa) (P<.05). The autopolymerization resin cement was the most radiolucent (1.1 mm Al) (P<.0001). Zinc phosphate and conventional glass ionomer cements were the most acidic immediately after mixing (pH 1.5 to 2.2) but were the least acidic after 24 hours (pH 6.4 to 6.8) (P<.0001). Within the limitations of this study the data showed a wide variation of material properties. The dual-polymerization resin luting agents tested showed the best combination of mechanical and physical properties combined with the highest setting pH. Photopolymerization of these resin-based materials was necessary to maximize strength and rigidity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Dent
                Eur J Dent
                European Journal of Dentistry
                Dental Investigations Society
                1305-7456
                1305-7464
                July 2010
                : 4
                : 3
                : 314-323
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dental Materials, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
                [b ]Masters Program in Clinical Dentistry, Positivo University, Brazil.
                [c ]Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
                [d ]Chemical Institute, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Bárbara Pick, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227. Cidade Universitária. 05508-000. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Phone: 55 41 99796310 Fax: 55 11 30917840, E-mail: barbara@ 123456pick.com.br
                Article
                dent04_p0314
                10.1055/s-0039-1697845
                2897866
                20613921
                88548311-c9b7-40ba-a8a1-510670266d88
                Copyright 2010 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
                History
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Dentistry
                flexural strength,microhardness,light transmission,resin cement,degree of conversion
                Dentistry
                flexural strength, microhardness, light transmission, resin cement, degree of conversion

                Comments

                Comment on this article