Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endocrine Therapy Nonadherence and Discontinuation in Black and White Women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Differential use of endocrine therapy (ET) by race may contribute to breast cancer outcome disparities, but racial differences in ET behaviors are poorly understood.

          Methods

          Women aged 20–74 years with a first primary, stage I–III, hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer were included. At 2 years postdiagnosis, we assessed nonadherence, defined as not taking ET every day or missing more than two pills in the past 14 days, discontinuation, and a composite measure of underuse, defined as either missing pills or discontinuing completely. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the relationship between race and nonadherence, discontinuation, and overall underuse in unadjusted, clinically adjusted, and socioeconomically adjusted models.

          Results

          A total of 1280 women were included; 43.2% self-identified as black. Compared to white women, black women more often reported nonadherence (13.7% vs 5.2%) but not discontinuation (10.0% vs 10.7%). Black women also more often reported the following: hot flashes, night sweats, breast sensitivity, and joint pain; believing that their recurrence risk would not change if they stopped ET; forgetting to take ET; and cost-related barriers. In multivariable analysis, black race remained statistically significantly associated with nonadherence after adjusting for clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.75 to 4.24) and after adding socioeconomic to clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.50 to 3.97) but was not independently associated with discontinuation after adjustment. Low recurrence risk perception and lack of a shared decision making were strongly predictive of ET underuse across races.

          Conclusions

          Our results highlight important racial differences in ET-adherence behaviors, perceptions of benefits/harms, and shared decision making that may be targeted with culturally tailored interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

          Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a method for encouraging people to make behavioral changes to improve health outcomes. We used systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate MI's efficacy in medical care settings. Database searches located randomized clinical trials that compared MI to comparison conditions and isolated the unique effect of MI within medical care settings. Forty-eight studies (9618 participants) were included. The overall effect showed a statistically significant, modest advantage for MI: Odd ratio=1.55 (CI: 1.40-1.71), z=8.67, p<.001. MI showed particular promise in areas such as HIV viral load, dental outcomes, death rate, body weight, alcohol and tobacco use, sedentary behavior, self-monitoring, confidence in change, and approach to treatment. MI was not particularly effective with eating disorder or self-care behaviors or some medical outcomes such as heart rate. MI was robust across moderators such as delivery location and patient characteristics, and appears efficacious when delivered in brief consultations. The emerging evidence for MI in medical care settings suggests it provides a moderate advantage over comparison interventions and could be used for a wide range of behavioral issues in health care. Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

              Previous research identified differences in breast cancer-specific mortality across 4 intrinsic tumor subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, basal-like, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive/estrogen receptor negative (HER2(+)/ER(-)). We used immunohistochemical markers to subtype 1,149 invasive breast cancer patients (518 African American, 631 white) in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based study of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Vital status was determined through 2006 using the National Death Index, with median follow-up of 9 years. Cancer subtypes luminal A, luminal B, basal-like, and HER2(+)/ER(-) were distributed as 64%, 11%, 11%, and 5% for whites, and 48%, 8%, 22%, and 7% for African Americans, respectively. Breast cancer mortality was higher for participants with HER2(+)/ER(-) and basal-like breast cancer compared with luminal A and B. African Americans had higher breast cancer-specific mortality than whites, but the effect of race was statistically significant only among women with luminal A breast cancer. However, when compared with the luminal A subtype within racial categories, mortality for participants with basal-like breast cancer was higher among whites (HR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.4) than African Americans (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.4), with the strongest effect seen in postmenopausal white women (HR = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.5-10.0). Our results confirm the association of basal-like breast cancer with poor prognosis and suggest that basal-like breast cancer is not an inherently more aggressive disease in African American women compared with whites. Additional analyses are needed in populations with known treatment profiles to understand the role of tumor subtypes and race in breast cancer mortality, and in particular our finding that among women with luminal A breast cancer, African Americans have higher mortality than whites. ©2010 AACR.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Natl Cancer Inst
                J. Natl. Cancer Inst
                jnci
                JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
                Oxford University Press
                0027-8874
                1460-2105
                May 2019
                20 September 2018
                20 September 2018
                : 111
                : 5
                : 498-508
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [2 ]Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [3 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
                [4 ]Division of Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
                [5 ]Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [6 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Stephanie B. Wheeler, MPH, PhD, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Dr, CB#7411, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 (e-mail: stephanie_wheeler@ 123456unc.edu ).
                Article
                djy136
                10.1093/jnci/djy136
                6510227
                30239824
                885df3e7-1d59-4e76-a4af-14c45c867920
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 21 October 2017
                : 8 June 2018
                : 10 July 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: American Cancer Society 10.13039/100000048
                Funded by: Mentored Research Scholar
                Award ID: MRSG-13–157-01-CPPB
                Funded by: Breast Cancer
                Award ID: NIH/NCI P50-CA58223
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute 10.13039/100000054
                Award ID: P01CA151135
                Funded by: Susan G. Komen Foundation
                Award ID: CCR 15333140
                Categories
                Articles

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article