3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Changes in Surgeries and Therapeutic Procedures During the COVID-19 Outbreak : A Longitudinal Study of Acute Care Hospitals in Japan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has required all specialties to triage patients for surgery and therapeutic procedures. 1 Forecast reports suggest that numerous elective surgeries may be canceled. 2 These circumstances raise concerns that patients may be delaying or entirely omitting necessary care. 3 However, little is known about how many surgeries were reduced and which specialties were most affected during this pandemic. This study evaluated nationwide changes in the number of surgeries across specialties during the COVID-19 outbreak in Japan. METHODS This longitudinal study used a de-identified hospital administrative database (inpatient and outpatient setting) from Japanese acute hospitals that consented to the data utilization, built by Medical Data Vision Co, Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). 4,5 We analyzed the number of each medical practice (identified by reimbursement codes) for 186 continuously-observed hospitals (spanned across 43 out of the 47 prefectures in Japan) during the weeks 2 to 17 of 2019 and 2020. These 186 hospitals covered 7% of the nationwide acute care hospitalizations. We described trends in surgeries, including therapeutic endovascular procedures and endoscopies, (a) overall and for 11 major specialties identified by reimbursement codes, including (b) brain and nervous system, (c) breasts, (d) cardiovascular system, (e) dermatology and plastics, (f) gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary system, (g) gynecology, (h) obstetrics, (i) ophthalmology, (j) orthopedics, (k) otolaryngology, and (l) urology. For reference, we showed the weekly confirmed new COVID-19 cases. We estimated the change in the number of surgeries during the COVID-19 outbreak using a “difference-in-differences” model that included a variable for each week, the year indicator (2020 vs 2019), and an interaction variable between outbreak status (week 10–17, after the adoption of the first governmental policy for COVID-19) and the year indicator. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated overall and by specialties using Poisson regressions with robust standard errors. To determine if there were changes in the number of surgeries for urgent versus nonurgent conditions, we conducted secondary analyses for the 3 most common urgent surgeries (endoscopic biliary stenting, ureteral stent placement, and emergency Cesarean sections) and nonurgent elective surgeries (cataract surgeries, subcutaneous benign tumor resection, and total hip arthroplasty / total knee arthroplasty) that were identified in the 2019 data. P < 0.05 was interpreted as statistically significant (Stata 15.1, College Station, TX). Ethics review was not required because no individual-level data were used. RESULTS The number of total surgeries decreased from 212,933 in weeks 2 to 9 of 2020 to 192,928 in weeks 10 to 17, a reduction of 9.4% [IRR, 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90–0.92; P < 0.001] (Fig. 1). The number of surgeries in weeks 2 to 9 versus weeks 10 to 17 of 2020 for brain and nervous system decreased from 3369 to 2916 (−13.4%; IRR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.77–0.89), for cardiovascular system from 18,150 to 16,348 (−9.9%; IRR, 0.89; 95%CI, 0.86–0.91), for dermatology and plastics from 17,262 to 15,327 (−11.2%; IRR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.83–0.88), for gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary system from 34,787 to 31,466 (−9.5%; IRR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.89–0.93), for obstetrics from 3392 to 2962 (−12.7%; IRR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.79–0.91), for ophthalmology from 18,763 to 17,251 (−8.1%; IRR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.90–0.96), for orthopedics from 21,418 to 18,901 (−11.8%; IRR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.89–0.94), and for otolaryngology from 6820 to 5596 (−17.9%; IRR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.73–0.81) (P < 0.001 for all). In contrast, we found no evidence that the number of surgeries for breasts (IRR, 0.94; P = 0.09), gynecology (IRR, 0.95; P = 0.07), or urology (IRR, 0.98; P = 0.29) declined. FIGURE 1 Trends in the number of surgeries overall and by specialty for Japanese Acute Care Hospitals during weeks 2 through 17 in 2019 and 2020. We identified surgeries for each specialty by using reimbursement codes for medical fee payments used throughout Japan. The number of surgeries in week 1 (the year-end and New Year Holidays) was very few and thus not shown. The figure of the weekly confirmed new COVID-19 cases (M) is based on the data reported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. GI indicates gastrointestinal; HPB, hepato-pancreato-biliary. The secondary analyses found no significant decrease in endoscopic biliary stenting (IRR, 0.95; P = 0.23), ureteral stent placement (IRR, 0.97; P = 0.53), or emergency Cesarean sections (IRR, 0.93; P = 0.37), but a decrease in cataract surgeries (IRR, 0.94; P < 0.001), subcutaneous benign tumor resection (IRR, 0.76; P < 0.001), and total hip arthroplasty / total knee arthroplasty (IRR, 0.88; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS There were significant decreases in surgeries during the COVID-19 outbreak in Japan. The declines were evident for the majority of specialties, including those generally related to life-threatening conditions, such as the brain and nervous system and cardiovascular system. However, contrary to the forecast, 2 some specialties did not experience significant declines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the impact of delaying surgery on long-term patient outcomes and hospital capacity separately by specialty. These results may reflect a combination of several factors. First, surgical resources devoted to COVID-19 care might explain our findings. In week 12, the Japanese government requested that local authorities take measures to reserve hospital beds and medical personnel for the growing number of COVID-19 patients, including cancellation of non-urgent elective surgeries. Second, concerns for COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers, especially in procedures with high aerosol exposure, might have influenced hospitals to postpone surgeries. 6 The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists announced precautions for the anesthesia management of suspected COVID-19 patients (week 10), and the Japan Surgical Society recommended deferring non-urgent elective surgeries for COVID-19 patients (week 14). For non-COVID-19 patients, the Japan Neurosurgical Society and the Otorhinolaryngological Society recommended postponing elective nasal surgeries (week 14), whereas other medical societies did not recommend the deferral of surgeries for non-COVID-19 patients. These precautions may be the reason for the dramatic decline in otolaryngology surgeries. Third, the varying reduction rates by specialties might reflect the difference in urgency profiles of surgeries. Our secondary analyses found that nonurgent surgeries significantly decreased, but urgent surgeries did not, suggesting that specialties with a higher proportion of nonurgent conditions (eg, dermatology and plastics, orthopedics, and ophthalmology 7 ) might have been more likely to postpone surgery. Nevertheless, our findings showed specialties with a higher proportion of urgent conditions also experienced reductions in surgeries, suggesting this explanation would not account for all of our results. Another cause may include a drop in traumatic injuries. The number of traffic accidents in April 2020 was lower compared to the previous year. 8 Limitations of this study include the patient population, which may not be generalizable to other countries. Japan has experienced fewer cases of COVID-19 than Western countries, 9 and the effects of crowding-out by COVID-19 patients and stay-at-home requests might be smaller. We did not survey all Japanese hospitals. Nevertheless, our dataset covered 186 hospitals, and the underlying patterns may be similar across Japan. Finally, the clinical consequences of decreased surgeries remain unknown and warrant longer-term studies. 10

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID ‐19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans

          Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted routine hospital services globally. This study estimated the total number of adult elective operations that would be cancelled worldwide during the 12 weeks of peak disruption due to COVID‐19. Methods A global expert‐response study was conducted to elicit projections for the proportion of elective surgery that would be cancelled or postponed during the 12 weeks of peak disruption. A Bayesian beta‐regression model was used to estimate 12‐week cancellation rates for 190 countries. Elective surgical case‐mix data, stratified by specialty and indication (cancer versus benign surgery), was determined. This case‐mix was applied to country‐level surgical volumes. The 12‐week cancellation rates were then applied to these figures to calculate total cancelled operations. Results The best estimate was that 28,404,603 operations would be cancelled or postponed during the peak 12 weeks of disruption due to COVID‐19 (2,367,050 operations per week). Most would be operations for benign disease (90.2%, 25,638,922/28,404,603). The overall 12‐week cancellation rate would be 72.3%. Globally, 81.7% (25,638,921/31,378,062) of benign surgery, 37.7% (2,324,069/6,162,311) of cancer surgery, and 25.4% (441,611/1,735,483) of elective Caesarean sections would be cancelled or postponed. If countries increase their normal surgical volume by 20% post‐pandemic, it would take a median 45 weeks to clear the backlog of operations resulting from COVID‐19 disruption. Conclusions A very large number of operations will be cancelled or postponed due to disruption caused by COVID‐19. Governments should mitigate against this major burden on patients by developing recovery plans and implementing strategies to safely restore surgical activity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immediate and long‐term impact of the COVID ‐19 pandemic on delivery of surgical services

            Background The ongoing pandemic is having a collateral health effect on delivery of surgical care to millions of patients. Very little is known about pandemic management and effects on other services, including delivery of surgery. Methods This was a scoping review of all available literature pertaining to COVID‐19 and surgery, using electronic databases, society websites, webinars and preprint repositories. Results Several perioperative guidelines have been issued within a short time. Many suggestions are contradictory and based on anecdotal data at best. As regions with the highest volume of operations per capita are being hit, an unprecedented number of operations are being cancelled or deferred. No major stakeholder seems to have considered how a pandemic deprives patients with a surgical condition of resources, with patients disproportionally affected owing to the nature of treatment (use of anaesthesia, operating rooms, protective equipment, physical invasion and need for perioperative care). No recommendations exist regarding how to reopen surgical delivery. The postpandemic evaluation and future planning should involve surgical services as an essential part to maintain appropriate surgical care for the population during an outbreak. Surgical delivery, owing to its cross‐cutting nature and synergistic effects on health systems at large, needs to be built into the WHO agenda for national health planning. Conclusion Patients are being deprived of surgical access, with uncertain loss of function and risk of adverse prognosis as a collateral effect of the pandemic. Surgical services need a contingency plan for maintaining surgical care in an ongoing or postpandemic phase.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Managing COVID-19 in Surgical Systems

              As COVID-19 spreads quickly from Europe and Asia to the rest of the world, hospitals are rapidly becoming hot zones for treatment and transmission of this disease in settings with rising community transmission. Health care workers are increasingly contracting this illness, decreasing the human resources available to care for a population in crisis. Surgical care is a foundation of any health system with both elective and emergency procedures contributing to the health of our populations. However, operating theaters are high-risk areas for transmission of respiratory infections given the urgency in management, the involvement of multiple staff, and the need for high transmission-risk activities such as airway management. Our systems are generally well designed to deal with the occasional high-risk cases. The additional strain presented by a high prevalence of disease, limited resources, and staff under pressure, greatly increases the risks of transmission and the burden on our systems of care during this pandemic. It is necessary for us to act immediately so our systems can support essential surgical care while protecting patients and staff and conserving valuable resources. We can benefit from some of the lessons provided from our colleagues around the world to help us stay on top of these issues as we plan our approach to surgery during the pandemic. 1. Prepare for a rapidly evolving situation. Any pathways and plans need to be developed with a recognition that the severity of the situation and the availability of resources may change on a daily basis. 2. Postpone elective operations immediately. Elective surgeries should ideally be postponed before it seems necessary. Postponing surgeries will reduce unnecessary patient traffic in the hospital and decrease the introduction and spread of disease between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and health care staff. In addition, reducing surgeries saves resources including hospital beds, personal protective equipment, as well as preserving the health of surgical staff. 3. Develop a clear plan for providing essential operations during the pandemic. This should include a plan to facilitate emergent life and limb saving surgeries as well as urgent surgeries such as cancer surgeries where long-term outcomes are dependent on timely interventions. The process should allow for the application of reasonable clinical judgement. For example, the biopsy of a suspicious breast lump is elective but cannot be postponed. 4. Educate all surgical staff on personal protective equipment and COVID-19 management. The appropriate use of personal protective equipment protects patients and staff from COVID-19 transmission, and yet these items are often not used appropriately. N95 masks that have been clearly shown to reduce transmission in a laboratory setting rarely work as well in practice. This is in large part because of a lack of awareness of appropriate donning and doffing procedures. All the members of the surgical team should be trained in appropriate use of personal protective equipment. The risk of transmission and resource consumption in educational simulation sessions means that other forms of education must be undertaken. Our current situation should serve as a reminder of the importance of training for disasters and pandemics before the need arises. 5. Decrease exposure of health care staff. For confirmed COVID-19 cases or cases where there is an active influenza-like illness, limiting operating theater staff to the essential members is key. Trainees, in particular, should not be involved with cases unnecessarily. As COVID-19 becomes further established in our communities, asymptomatic patients who are carriers will increasingly enter the health care system for unrelated ailments and pose a risk for transmission. For this reason, reasonable measures should be taken even in asymptomatic patients such as strict adherence to universal precautions, frequent handwashing, and elimination of unnecessary staff. Keeping surgical staff out of hospital and self-isolating at home when they are not needed is a key measure to preserving our human resources. 6. Develop a dedicated COVID-19 operating space. The development of a dedicated COVID-19 operating theater may help to contain the spread of disease. The experience from centers such as Singapore as well as centers that have seen high volumes of cases in other parts of the world including within the United States and Canada provide some guidance on how these systems can be optimally designed. These include a number of key points: 1. Designate a specific operating theater for all COVID-19 cases. This room should be out of high-traffic areas and be completely emptied of all nonessential materials. When an anteroom is available, this should be used as an area for donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and exchange of equipment, medications, and materials for the case. Instructional posters on appropriate procedures should be prominently displayed. If an anteroom is not available, a taped off area should be clearly marked for these activities just outside of the OR door. 2. No unnecessary items should be brought into the operating theater, this includes personal items such as pagers or cell phones and pens. Disposable caps and shoe covers should be worn and discarded after each case. Disposable pens should be provided in the room. Only the materials necessary for the case should be within the room and all disposables should be discarded at the end of the case. 3. All traffic in and out of the operating theater should be minimized. A runner or support staff should be dedicated to the Operating theater to provide all materials needed throughout the case with exchanges performed using a material exchange cart placed immediately outside of the room or in the anteroom. 4. When possible, the patient should be recovered in the operating theater with dedicated staff until they can be transferred to an isolation room on the ward or in the intensive care unit. 5. The path of the patient to and from the operating theater should be kept clear. This can be done using either security or a surgical team member traveling in advance of the patient to clear the way. 6. Consideration should be given to surgical approaches that could decrease operating staff exposure and shorten case duration. 7. Care pathways and protocols for COVID-19 cases should be very clearly developed and be specific to the needs of each site. This should include the identification of dedicated team members to manage COVID-19 cases each day. 7. The changing landscape of the pandemic may require patient transfers and repurposing operating theaters to support critical care patients. The intensive care needs of the COVID-19 patient population will be substantial, and may quickly overwhelm the systems that provide critical care. Operating theaters are optimally designed to provide support for ventilated patients and may become precious resources for the ongoing care of patients typically managed in the intensive care unit. This need may further strain the surgical capacity of health systems. Hospitals need to be prepared to transfer patients between centers and share resources to optimize the care of regional populations. The provision of surgery will continue to be an essential aspect of our healthcare system throughout the pandemic. All surgical systems will need to adapt to a rapidly changing environment. Having a clear surgical strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic will keep our systems resilient and effective and allow us to provide the very best care to the populations we serve. Forums for communication such as that established by the American College of Surgeons (https://acscommunities.facs.org) can be used to share recommendations and best practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Surg
                Ann Surg
                ANSU
                Annals of Surgery
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0003-4932
                1528-1140
                April 2021
                17 November 2020
                : 273
                : 4
                : e132-e134
                Affiliations
                []Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
                []Medical Data Vision Co, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
                []Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
                [§ ]Datack, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
                Author notes

                The Medical Data Vision Co, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) provided the dataset used in this study to Dr. Miyawaki in the form of labor service. The sponsor collected the data but did not have any other role in study design, analysis, interpretation of data, or writing the report.

                Mr. Masaki Nakamura is one of the board of directors in Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd and received personal salary from it outside this study. Dr. Hideki Ninomiya supports the Medical Data Vision Co, Ltd. in algorithm construction and received personal fee outside this study. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

                Author contributions: Dr. Miyawaki had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the data and its analyses.

                Study concept and design: All authors.

                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

                Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.

                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

                Statistical analysis: All authors.

                Administrative, technical, or material support: All authors.

                Study supervision: Miyawaki.

                Article
                ANNSURG-D-20-02754 00033
                10.1097/SLA.0000000000004528
                7959863
                33214438
                88dcb789-9dd3-4cfc-b567-68bff4f2a550
                Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                Categories
                Covid-19
                Custom metadata
                ONLINE-ONLY

                covid-19,difference-in-differences,health services research,hospital care,japan,pandemic,sars-coc-2,surgical care

                Comments

                Comment on this article