12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) and realist evaluation of the interdisciplinary home-bAsed Reablement program (I-HARP) for improving functional independence of community dwelling older people with dementia: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A major gap exists internationally in providing support to maintain functional and social independence of older people with dementia living at home. This project evaluates a model of care that integrates evidence-based strategies into a person-centred interdisciplinary rehabilitation package: Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Program (I-HARP). Two central aims are: 1) to determine the effectiveness of I-HARP on functional independence, mobility, quality of life and depression among people with dementia, their home environmental safety, carer burden and quality of life, and I-HARP cost-effectiveness; and 2) to evaluate the processes, outcomes and influencing factors of the I-HARP implementation.

          Methods

          I-HARP is a 4-month model of care, integrated in community aged care services and hospital-based community geriatric services, and consists of: 1) 8–12 home visits, tailored to the individual client’s needs, by an occupational therapist, registered nurse, and other allied health staff; 2) minor home modifications/assistive devices to the value of <A$1000 per participant; and 3) three individual carer support sessions. The overarching design is a mixed-methods action research approach, consisting of a multi-centre pragmatic parallel-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) and realist evaluation, conducted in two phases. Participants include 176 dyads (person aged > 60 years with mild to moderate dementia and his/her carer). During Phase I, I-HARP advisory group is established and training of I-HARP interventionists is completed, and the effectiveness of I-HARP is examined using a pragmatic RCT. Phase II, conducted concurrently with Phase I, focuses on the process evaluation of the I-HARP implementation using a realist approach. Semi-structured interviews with participants and focus groups with I-HARP interventionists and participating site managers will provide insights into the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of I-HARP.

          Discussion

          I-HARP is being evaluated within the real-world systems of hospital-based and community-based aged care services in Australia. Future directions and strategies for reablement approaches to care for community dwelling people living with dementia, will be developed. The study will provide evidence to inform key stakeholders in their decision making and the use/delivery of the program, as well as influence future systems-thinking and changes for dementia care.

          Trial registration

          Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTR N12618000600246 (approved 18/04/2018).

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The disablement process

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.

            The EQ-5D-5L has recently been developed to improve the sensitivity of the widely used three-level version. Valuation studies are required before the use of this new instrument can be adopted. The use of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) in this area is a promising area of research. To test the plausibility and acceptability of estimating an Australian algorithm for the newly developed five-level version of the EQ-5D using a DCE. A choice experiment was designed, consisting of 200 choice sets blocked such that each respondent answered 10 choice sets. Each choice set presented two health state-duration combinations, and an immediate death option. The experiment was implemented in an online Australian-representative sample. A random-effects probit model was estimated. To explore the feasibility of the approach, an indicative algorithm was developed. The algorithm is transformed to a 0 to 1 scale suitable for use to estimate quality-adjusted life-year weights for use in economic evaluation. A total of 973 respondents undertook the choice experiment. Respondents were slightly younger and better educated than the general Australian population. Of the 973 respondents, 932 (95.8 %) completed all ten choice sets, and a further 12 completed some of the choice sets. In choice sets in which one health state-duration combination dominated another, the dominant option was selected on 89.5 % of occasions. The mean and median completion times were 17.9 and 9.4 min, respectively, exhibiting a highly skewed distribution. The estimation results are broadly consistent with the monotonic nature of the EQ-5D-5L. Utility is increasing in life expectancy (i.e., respondents tend to prefer health profiles with longer life expectancy), and mainly decreases in higher levels in each dimension of the instrument. A high proportion of respondents found the task clear and relatively easy to complete. DCEs are a feasible approach to the estimation of utility weights for more complex multi-attribute utility instruments such as the EQ-5D-5L.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Home-Based Care Program Reduces Disability And Promotes Aging In Place

              The Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) program, funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, aims to reduce the impact of disability among low-income older adults by addressing individual capacities and the home environment. The program, described in this innovation profile, uses an interprofessional team (an occupational therapist, a registered nurse, and a handyman) to help participants achieve goals they set. For example, it provides assistive devices and makes home repairs and modifications that enable participants to navigate their homes more easily and safely. In the period 2012-15, a demonstration project enrolled 281 adults ages sixty-five and older who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and who had difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADLs). After completing the five-month program, 75 percent of participants had improved their performance of ADLs. Participants had difficulty with an average of 3.9 out of 8.0 ADLs at baseline, compared to 2.0 after five months. Symptoms of depression and the ability to perform instrumental ADLs such as shopping and managing medications also improved. Health systems are testing CAPABLE on a larger scale. The program has the potential to improve older adults' ability to age in place.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                61+2+9351 0674 , yun-hee.jeon@sydney.edu.au
                judy.simpson@sydney.edu.au
                lee-fay.low@sydney.edu.au
                b.woods@bangor.ac.uk
                richard.norman@curtin.edu.au
                loren.mowszowski@sydney.edu.au
                lindy.clemson@sydney.edu.au
                sharon.naismith@sydney.edu.au
                h.brodaty@unsw.edu.au
                sarah.hilmer@sydney.edu.au
                amilleramberber@csu.edu.au
                lng45@drexel.edu
                sarah.szanton@jhu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                29 July 2019
                29 July 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 199
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, , The University of Sydney, ; 88 Mallett Street – Building M02, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Sydney School of Public Health, , The University of Sydney, ; Camperdown, Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Faculty of Health Sciences, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000118820937, GRID grid.7362.0, Bangor University, ; Bangor, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0375 4078, GRID grid.1032.0, Curtin University, ; Perth, Australia
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Brain and Mind Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Psychology, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4902 0432, GRID grid.1005.4, CHeBA (Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing), , School of Psychiatry, UNSW, ; Sydney, Australia
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0587 9093, GRID grid.412703.3, Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, , University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, ; St Leonards, NSW Australia
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0368 0777, GRID grid.1037.5, Charles Sturt University, ; Albury Wodonga, Australia
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2181 3113, GRID grid.166341.7, College of Nursing and Health Professions, , Drexel University, ; Philadelphia, PA USA
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, GRID grid.21107.35, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, , Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-9134
                Article
                1216
                10.1186/s12877-019-1216-x
                6664757
                31357949
                890e3798-4808-447b-9aad-02f13d818c9f
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 February 2019
                : 17 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: GNT1137050
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Geriatric medicine
                dementia,interdisciplinary teamwork,community care,reablement,cognitive rehabilitation,pragmatic trial,implementation

                Comments

                Comment on this article