351
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    9
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On inferring structural connectivity from brain functional-MRI data

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The anatomical structure of the brain can be observed via non-invasive techniques such as diffusion imaging. However, these are imperfect because they miss connections that are actually known to exist, especially long range inter-hemispheric ones. In this paper we formulate the inverse problem of inferring the structural connectivity of brain networks from experimentally observed functional connectivity via functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), by formulating it as a convex optimization problem. We show that structural connectivity can be modeled as an optimal sparse representation derived from the much denser functional connectivity in the human brain. Using only the functional connectivity data as input, we present (a) an optimization problem that models constraints based on known physiological observations, and (b) an ADMM algorithm for solving it. The algorithm not only recovers the known structural connectivity of the brain, but is also able to robustly predict the long range inter-hemispheric connections missed by DSI or DTI, including a very good match with experimentally observed quantitative distributions of the weights/strength of anatomical connections. We demonstrate results on both synthetic model data and a fine-scale 998 node cortical dataset, and discuss applications to other complex network domains where retrieving effective structure from functional signatures are important.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Statistical mechanics of complex networks

          Complex networks describe a wide range of systems in nature and society, much quoted examples including the cell, a network of chemicals linked by chemical reactions, or the Internet, a network of routers and computers connected by physical links. While traditionally these systems were modeled as random graphs, it is increasingly recognized that the topology and evolution of real networks is governed by robust organizing principles. Here we review the recent advances in the field of complex networks, focusing on the statistical mechanics of network topology and dynamics. After reviewing the empirical data that motivated the recent interest in networks, we discuss the main models and analytical tools, covering random graphs, small-world and scale-free networks, as well as the interplay between topology and the network's robustness against failures and attacks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sparse subspace clustering: algorithm, theory, and applications.

            Many real-world problems deal with collections of high-dimensional data, such as images, videos, text, and web documents, DNA microarray data, and more. Often, such high-dimensional data lie close to low-dimensional structures corresponding to several classes or categories to which the data belong. In this paper, we propose and study an algorithm, called sparse subspace clustering, to cluster data points that lie in a union of low-dimensional subspaces. The key idea is that, among the infinitely many possible representations of a data point in terms of other points, a sparse representation corresponds to selecting a few points from the same subspace. This motivates solving a sparse optimization program whose solution is used in a spectral clustering framework to infer the clustering of the data into subspaces. Since solving the sparse optimization program is in general NP-hard, we consider a convex relaxation and show that, under appropriate conditions on the arrangement of the subspaces and the distribution of the data, the proposed minimization program succeeds in recovering the desired sparse representations. The proposed algorithm is efficient and can handle data points near the intersections of subspaces. Another key advantage of the proposed algorithm with respect to the state of the art is that it can deal directly with data nuisances, such as noise, sparse outlying entries, and missing entries, by incorporating the model of the data into the sparse optimization program. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm through experiments on synthetic data as well as the two real-world problems of motion segmentation and face clustering.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Spatial Networks

              (2010)
              Complex systems are very often organized under the form of networks where nodes and edges are embedded in space. Transportation and mobility networks, Internet, mobile phone networks, power grids, social and contact networks, neural networks, are all examples where space is relevant and where topology alone does not contain all the information. Characterizing and understanding the structure and the evolution of spatial networks is thus crucial for many different fields ranging from urbanism to epidemiology. An important consequence of space on networks is that there is a cost associated to the length of edges which in turn has dramatic effects on the topological structure of these networks. We will expose thoroughly the current state of our understanding of how the spatial constraints affect the structure and properties of these networks. We will review the most recent empirical observations and the most important models of spatial networks. We will also discuss various processes which take place on these spatial networks, such as phase transitions, random walks, synchronization, navigation, resilience, and disease spread.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                1502.06659

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article