15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Terrestrial mammal assemblages in protected and human impacted areas in Northern Brazilian Amazonia

      , , ,
      Nature Conservation
      Pensoft Publishers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mammal communities in the vicinity of human settlements are often subject to subsistence hunting and retaliatory killings. We used fourteen digital camera traps equipped with infrared triggers to sample the medium-sized and large mammal communities for ca. 34 (±1.64) days per site. Diversity was measured as both Shannon entropy and Fager´s number of moves (NMS), and dominance was quantified using the Berger-Parker index. We used Kruskall-Wallis tests to investigate if there were statistically significant differences in richness, diversity and dominance among the sites. At an overall sampling effort of 1,946 trap days we recorded 216 independent observations of a total of 20 species belonging to 17 genera and 15 families. Richness and diversity appeared to be determined by forest structure, since, independent of the level of human impact, the richest areas were those closest to the ombrophilous forests of southern Guyana shield, closest to central Amazonia, whereas the poorest were at those sites closest to the vegetation mosaics of central Guyana shield. The disappearance of Tayassu pecari from the impacted areas as well as higher relative abundances in the protected areas, albeit not significant, foresees a possible bleak future for the mammalian assemblages in the near future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis.

            There is growing concern about increased population, regional, and global extinctions of species. A key question is whether extinction rates for one group of organisms are representative of other taxa. We present a comparison at the national scale of population and regional extinctions of birds, butterflies, and vascular plants from Britain in recent decades. Butterflies experienced the greatest net losses, disappearing on average from 13% of their previously occupied 10-kilometer squares. If insects elsewhere in the world are similarly sensitive, the known global extinction rates of vertebrate and plant species have an unrecorded parallel among the invertebrates, strengthening the hypothesis that the natural world is experiencing the sixth major extinction event in its history.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature Conservation
                NC
                Pensoft Publishers
                1314-3301
                1314-6947
                October 17 2017
                October 17 2017
                : 22
                : 147-167
                Article
                10.3897/natureconservation.22.17370
                8a06a7c0-de1b-409d-9614-ce62cbbc14ef
                © 2017

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article