1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rapid Determination of Low Heavy Metal Concentrations in Grassland Soils around Mining Using Vis–NIR Spectroscopy: A Case Study of Inner Mongolia, China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Proximal sensing offers a novel means for determination of the heavy metal concentration in soil, facilitating low cost and rapid analysis over large areas. In this respect, spectral data and model variables play an important role. Thus far, no attempts have been made to estimate soil heavy metal content using continuum-removal (CR), different preprocessing and statistical methods, and different modeling variables. Considering the adsorption and retention of heavy metals in spectrally active constituents in soil, this study proposes a method for determining low heavy metal concentrations in soil using spectral bands associated with soil organic matter (SOM) and visible–near-infrared (Vis–NIR). To rapidly determine the concentration of heavy metals using hyperspectral data, partial least squares regression (PLSR), principal component regression (PCR), and support vector machine regression (SVMR) statistical methods and 16 preprocessing combinations were developed and explored to determine an optimal combination. The results showed that the multiplicative scatter correction and standard normal variate preprocessing methods evaluated with the second derivative spectral transformation method could accurately determine soil Cr and Ni concentrations. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) values of Vis–NIR model combinations with PLSR, PCR, and SVMR were 0.34, 3.42, and 2.15 for Cr, and 0.07, 1.78, and 1.14 for Ni, respectively. Soil Cr and Ni showed strong spectral responses to the Vis–NIR spectral band. The R 2 value of the Vis–NIR-based PLSR model was higher than 0.99, and the RMSE value was 0.07–0.34, suggesting higher stability and accuracy. The results were more accurate for Ni than Cr, and PLSR showed the best performance, followed by SVMR and PCR. This perspective has critical implications for guiding quantitative biogeochemical analysis using proximal sensing data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                06 May 2021
                May 2021
                : 21
                : 9
                : 3220
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; arh690@ 123456nenu.edu.cn (A.H.); baoyb924@ 123456nenu.edu.cn (Y.B.); maqing95708@ 123456163.com (Q.M.); liuxp912@ 123456nenu.edu.cn (X.L.)
                [2 ]Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China
                [3 ]State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Changchun 130024, China
                [4 ]College of Tourism and Geographical Science, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng 137000, China; lxl7302@ 123456163.com
                [5 ]College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China; qingsong@ 123456imnu.edu.cn (S.Q.); baoyuhai@ 123456imnu.edu.cn (Y.B.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: zhangjq022@ 123456nenu.edu.cn ; Tel.: +86-135-9608-6467
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6077-8429
                Article
                sensors-21-03220
                10.3390/s21093220
                8124297
                8a40525b-cd28-4309-bdd9-11535b116d01
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 March 2021
                : 30 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                soil spectral information,spectral transformation,heavy metal,vis–nir,organic matter

                Comments

                Comment on this article