4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence of and Risk Factors for Lactational Mastitis: A Systematic Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lactational mastitis is a maternal morbidity that affects the wellbeing of women and their babies, including through breastfeeding discontinuation.

          Research Aim

          To systematically review the available global literature on the frequency of lactational mastitis, and to summarize the evidence on risk factors for lactational mastitis. We also describe gaps in the evidence and identify priority areas for future research.

          Methods

          We systematically searched and screened 6 databases and included 26 articles, conducted meta-analysis of disease frequency, and narratively synthesized evidence on risk factors.

          Results

          In 11 (42%) articles researchers reported a measure of disease frequency; 5 (19%) reported risk factors, and 10 (39%) included both. Overall, the quality of studies was low, related to suboptimal measurement of disease frequency, high risk of bias, reverse causality, and incomplete adjustment for confounding. Meta-analysis was based on 3 studies (pooled incidence between birth and Week 25 postpartum: 11.1 episodes per 1,000 breastfeeding weeks; 95% CI [10.2–12.0]); with high heterogeneity across contexts and highest incidence in the first four weeks postpartum. Researchers assessed 42 potential risk factors; nipple damage was the most frequently studied and strongly associated with mastitis. There was a scarcity of studies from low-resource settings.

          Conclusions

          Lactational mastitis is a common condition, but the wide variability in incidence across contexts suggested that a substantial portion of this burden might be preventable. Provision of care to breastfeeding women at risk for or affected by mastitis is currently constrained due to a critical lack of high quality epidemiological evidence about its incidence and risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis in clinical trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

            This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials. Each review pools the results from the relevant trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition. These reviews lack consistent assessment of homogeneity of treatment effect before pooling. We discuss a random effects approach to combining evidence from a series of experiments comparing two treatments. This approach incorporates the heterogeneity of effects in the analysis of the overall treatment efficacy. The model can be extended to include relevant covariates which would reduce the heterogeneity and allow for more specific therapeutic recommendations. We suggest a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mastitis: comparative etiology and epidemiology.

              Mastitis is broadly defined as the inflammation of the mammary gland; however, the concept of mastitis is customized to address its social and clinical impact in the case of humans and the health, welfare, and economic consequences for other mammals. There are many microbial, host, and environmental factors that influence the development of mastitis. Some are common to all mammals as well as inherent to each species. Together these factors influence the most prevalent etiological agents for each species and might determine the possibility of interspecies transmission with its consequences to public health. The present review will summarize and compare reports on mastitis etiology and its epidemiology in humans and food animal species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hum Lact
                J Hum Lact
                JHL
                spjhl
                Journal of Human Lactation
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0890-3344
                1552-5732
                14 April 2020
                November 2020
                : 36
                : 4
                : 673-686
                Affiliations
                [1 ]London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [2 ]University College London, University College, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
                Author notes
                [*]Lenka Benova PhD, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, Antwerp 2000 Belgium. Email: lbenova@ 123456itg.be
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-2351
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8595-365X
                Article
                10.1177_0890334420907898
                10.1177/0890334420907898
                7672676
                32286139
                8a4661cb-170d-4ef0-a39a-094f647b1ea1
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 18 January 2019
                : 30 January 2020
                Categories
                State of the Science
                Custom metadata
                ts4

                breastfeeding,breastfeeding difficulties,breast pain,epidemiological methods,mastitis

                Comments

                Comment on this article