8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      1165. Longitudinal Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response Using Dried Blood Spot Samples Following Vaccination with Three and Four Doses of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 and/or ChAdOx1-S in Adults Aged 50 and Above: Interim Analysis from the PREVENT-COVID Study

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Multiple combinations of COVID-19 vaccine regimens have been used in Canada throughout the SARS-CoV-2 immunization campaign. Studies evaluating the humoral immune response following COVID-19 vaccination in community dwelling older adults remain limited. This study assessed COVID-19 vaccine elicited antibody responses in older adult populations, alongside factors that influence antibody responses.

          Methods

          Community dwelling adults aged 50 to 87 years (mean=65) were enrolled (n=612). Detection of index SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG (anti-S-IgG) concentration and surrogate neutralization were performed on dried blood spot samples via two multiplex assays (Meso Scale Diagnostics). Anti-S-IgG concentration and surrogate neutralization were quantified following mRNA (mRNA-1273 [m-1273], BNT162b2 [BNT]) or viral vector (ChAdOx1-S [ChAd]) vaccination. Vaccine groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests. Multivariable regression analyses evaluated influences of demographic and clinical factors on humoral immune responses.

          Results

          Three doses of m-1273 resulted in significantly higher anti-S-IgG compared with three BNT doses at four months (geometric mean concentration; 10167 AU/mL vs. 5412 AU/mL, P=0.009) post dose three. Three dose mixed vaccination with ChAd, m-1273 and BNT resulted in comparable anti-S-IgG concentration to three dose m-1273 at four months post dose three. Three doses of either m-1273 or mixed mRNA containing vaccines was associated with significantly higher surrogate neutralization compared with three BNT doses at four months (46% & 43% vs. 34%, P=0.002) post dose three. No significant difference in anti-S-IgG concentration was observed in four dose vaccination regimens. SARS-CoV-2 infection, health status of excellent or very good, and m-1273 containing vaccine regimens positively influenced the antibody response.

          Conclusion

          Immunization schedules including a minimum of one m-1273 dose elicited the strongest and most durable antibody responses compared with BNT only containing regimens. There is no established correlate of protection for COVID-19, and as such this data should be interpreted alongside vaccine effectiveness studies. Omicron and XBB specific antibody responses will be compared.

          Disclosures

          Sofia R. Bartlett, PhD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|Cepheid: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support Theodore Steiner, MD, FRCPC, Edesa: Grant/Research Support|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Grant/Research Support|Qu Biologics: Advisor/Consultant|Qu Biologics: Stocks/Bonds|Seres: Grant/Research Support Manish Sadarangani, BM BCh, FRCPC, DPhil, GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Symvivo: Grant/Research Support|VBI Vaccines: Grant/Research Support

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          December 2023
          27 November 2023
          27 November 2023
          : 10
          : Suppl 2 , IDWeek 2023 Abstracts
          : ofad500.1005
          Affiliations
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          BC Centre for Disease Control , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          UBC , Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          BC Centre for Disease Control , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          UBC , Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          BC Centre for Disease Control/ University of British Columbia Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          BC Centre for Disease Control , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          Author notes

          Session: 130. Adult Vaccines

          Friday, October 13, 2023: 12:15 PM

          Article
          ofad500.1005
          10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1005
          10676841
          8a9520c7-aeda-4497-a21a-abba8c306eac
          © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Categories
          Abstract
          AcademicSubjects/MED00290

          Comments

          Comment on this article