8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Differentiating self-touch from social touch

      ,
      Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body.

          A. Craig (2002)
          As humans, we perceive feelings from our bodies that relate our state of well-being, our energy and stress levels, our mood and disposition. How do we have these feelings? What neural processes do they represent? Recent functional anatomical work has detailed an afferent neural system in primates and in humans that represents all aspects of the physiological condition of the physical body. This system constitutes a representation of 'the material me', and might provide a foundation for subjective feelings, emotion and self-awareness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

              A self-produced tactile stimulus is perceived as less ticklish than the same stimulus generated externally. We used fMRI to examine neural responses when subjects experienced a tactile stimulus that was either self-produced or externally produced. More activity was found in somatosensory cortex when the stimulus was externally produced. In the cerebellum, less activity was associated with a movement that generated a tactile stimulus than with a movement that did not. This difference suggests that the cerebellum is involved in predicting the specific sensory consequences of movements, providing the signal that is used to cancel the sensory response to self-generated stimulation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
                Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
                Elsevier BV
                23521546
                February 2022
                February 2022
                : 43
                : 27-33
                Article
                10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.06.012
                8b23262f-8cbc-400d-83bb-714f8e25d7ba
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article