Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Coupling of Water‐Carbon Interactions During Snowmelt in an Arctic Finland Catchment

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Snowmelt spring floods regulate carbon transport from land to streams. However, these coupled processes are rarely documented through high‐resolution measurements focused on water‐carbon interactions. We collated a state‐of‐the‐art high‐frequency data set throughout a snowmelt and early post snowmelt period, alongside regular samples of stream water, precipitation, and snowmelt isotopes (δ 18O). Our study was conducted during the 2019 snowmelt and initial post snowmelt season in a subarctic, peatland influenced headwater catchment in Pallas, Northern Finland. We measured high‐frequency dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and in‐stream carbon dioxide (pCO 2). We identified a change in hydrological processes as the snowmelt season progressed and the post snowmelt season began. We found (a) Overland flow dominated stream DOC dynamics in early snowmelt, while increased catchment connectivity opened new distal pathways in the later snowmelt period; (b) CO 2 processes were initially driven by rapid bursts of CO 2 from the meltwaters in snowmelt, followed by dilution and source limitation emerging post snowmelt as deep soil pathways replaced the snowpack as the main source of CO 2; (c) stream carbon concentration shifted from being relatively balanced between CO 2 and DOC during the early snowmelt period to being increasingly DOC dominated as snowmelt progressed due to changes in DOC and CO 2 source supply. The study highlights the importance of using high‐frequency measurements combined with high‐frequency data analyses to identify changes in the processes driving water‐carbon interactions. The degree to which water‐carbon interactions respond to the continuation of Arctic water cycle amplification is central to delineating the evolving complexity of the future Arctic.

          Key Points

          • Unique high‐frequency monitoring of stream dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and CO 2 reveals the evolution of water‐carbon interactions during snowmelt

          • Rapid surface pathways control DOC and CO 2 dynamics during early snowmelt, but distal sub‐surface pathways are dominant in late snowmelt

          • Changes to snowmelt season characteristics will have substantial implications for the carbon cycle in headwater streams

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Water Resources Research
                Water Resources Research
                0043-1397
                1944-7973
                May 2023
                May 02 2023
                May 2023
                : 59
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit University of Oulu Oulu Finland
                [2 ] Finnish Meteorological Institute Oulu Finland
                [3 ] INAR Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics Faculty of Science University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                [4 ] Ecology and Genetics Research Unit University of Oulu Oulu Finland
                [5 ] Department of Biological Sciences University of Alaska Anchorage FI Oulu USA
                [6 ] UArctic Rovaniemi Finland
                [7 ] Finnish Environment Institute Helsinki Finland
                Article
                10.1029/2022WR032892
                8b45b9ef-5a73-4e9a-8401-725d594ad367
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article