19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “It’s all about asking from those who have walked the path”: Patient and stakeholder perspectives on how peers may shift substance use stigma in HIV care in South Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          South Africa has the highest number of people with HIV (PWH) globally and a significant burden of co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD). Health care worker (HCW) stigma towards SUD is a key barrier to HIV care engagement among PWH with SUD. Support from peers—individuals with lived experience of SUD—may be a promising solution for addressing SUD stigma, while also improving engagement in HIV care. We evaluated the perceived acceptability of integrating a peer role into community-based HIV care teams as a strategy to address SUD stigma at multiple levels and improve patient engagement in HIV care.

          Methods

          Patients and stakeholders ( N = 40) were recruited from publicly-funded HIV and SUD organizations in Cape Town, South Africa. We conducted a quantitative assessment of stigma among stakeholders using an adapted Social Distance Scale (SDS) and patient perceptions of working with a peer, as well as semi-structured interviews focused on experiences of SUD stigma, acceptability of a peer model integrated into community-based HIV care, and potential peer roles.

          Results

          On the SDS, 75% of stakeholders had high stigma towards a patient with SUD, yet 90% had low stigma when in recovery for at least 2 years. All patients endorsed feeling comfortable talking to someone in recovery and wanting them on their HIV care team. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1) patient-reported experiences of enacted SUD and HIV stigmas were common and impacted HIV care engagement; (2) both patients and stakeholders considered a peer model highly acceptable for integration into HIV care to support engagement and address SUD stigma; and (3) patients and stakeholders identified both individual-level and systems-level roles for peers, how peers could work alongside other providers to improve patient care, and key characteristics that peers would need to be successful in these roles.

          Conclusions

          Findings from this formative work point to the promise of a peer model for reducing SUD stigma among patients and HCWs within community-based HIV care teams in SA.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13722-022-00330-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

            Background Many interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts. Methods We used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts. Results The CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct. Conclusion The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

              Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. Although there are several different purposeful sampling strategies, criterion sampling appears to be used most commonly in implementation research. However, combining sampling strategies may be more appropriate to the aims of implementation research and more consistent with recent developments in quantitative methods. This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposeful sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jmagidso@umd.edu
                bronwyn.myers-franchi@curtin.edu.au
                Journal
                Addict Sci Clin Pract
                Addict Sci Clin Pract
                Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1940-0632
                1940-0640
                21 September 2022
                21 September 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.164295.d, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 7177, Department of Psychology, , University of Maryland, ; 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland, MD USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.415021.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9155 0024, Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, , South African Medical Research Council, ; Parow, South Africa
                [3 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, , University of Washington, ; Seattle, WA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.410567.1, Department of Clinical Research, , University Hospital Basel, ; Basel, Switzerland
                [5 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, HIV Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, , Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.1032.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0375 4078, Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, , Curtin University, ; Building 408, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845 Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.6612.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0642, University of Basel, ; Basel, Switzerland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-3255
                Article
                330
                10.1186/s13722-022-00330-5
                9490994
                36131304
                8b96ad64-7589-4796-86cc-77173885e7bb
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 10 January 2022
                : 17 August 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000026, National Institute on Drug Abuse;
                Award ID: R21DA053212
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: R34MH122268
                Award ID: F31MH123020
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Health & Social care
                peer,substance use stigma,substance use treatment,hiv stigma,global mental health,implementation science

                Comments

                Comment on this article