10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following a statewide standing order, Indiana 2016

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          While naloxone, the overdose reversal medication, has been available for decades, factors associated with its availability through pharmacies remain unclear. Studies suggest that policy and pharmacist beliefs may impact availability. Indiana passed a standing order law for naloxone in 2015 to increase access to naloxone.

          Objective:

          To identify factors associated with community pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following the enactment of a statewide naloxone standing order.

          Methods:

          A 2016 cross-sectional census of Indiana community pharmacists was conducted following a naloxone standing order. Community, pharmacy, and pharmacist characteristics, and pharmacist attitudes about naloxone dispensing, access, and perceptions of the standing order were measured. Modified Poisson and binary logistic regression models attempted to predict naloxone stocking and dispensing, respectively.

          Results:

          Over half (58.1%) of pharmacies stocked naloxone, yet 23.6% of pharmacists dispensed it. Most (72.5%) pharmacists believed the standing order would increase naloxone stocking, and 66.5% believed it would increase dispensing. Chain pharmacies were 3.2 times as likely to stock naloxone. Naloxone stocking was 1.6 times as likely in pharmacies with more than one full-time pharmacist. Pharmacies where pharmacists received naloxone continuing education in the past two years were 1.3 times as likely to stock naloxone. The attempted dispensing model yielded no improvement over the constant-only model.

          Conclusions:

          Pharmacies with larger capacity took advantage of the naloxone standing order. Predictors of pharmacist naloxone dispensing should continue to be explored to maximize naloxone access.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies.

            Some recent articles have discussed biased methods for estimating risk ratios from adjusted odds ratios when the outcome is common, and the problem of setting confidence limits for risk ratios. These articles have overlooked the extensive literature on valid estimation of risks, risk ratios, and risk differences from logistic and other models, including methods that remain valid when the outcome is common, and methods for risk and rate estimation from case-control studies. The present article describes how most of these methods can be subsumed under a general formulation that also encompasses traditional standardization methods and methods for projecting the impact of partially successful interventions. Approximate variance formulas for the resulting estimates allow interval estimation; these intervals can be closely approximated by rapid simulation procedures that require only standard software functions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Community Outbreak of HIV Infection Linked to Injection Drug Use of Oxymorphone — Indiana, 2015

              On January 23, 2015, the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) began an ongoing investigation of an outbreak of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, after Indiana disease intervention specialists reported 11 confirmed HIV cases traced to a rural county in southeastern Indiana. Historically, fewer than five cases of HIV infection have been reported annually in this county. The majority of cases were in residents of the same community and were linked to syringe-sharing partners injecting the prescription opioid oxymorphone (a powerful oral semi-synthetic opioid analgesic). As of April 21, ISDH had diagnosed HIV infection in 135 persons (129 with confirmed HIV infection and six with preliminarily positive results from rapid HIV testing that were pending confirmatory testing) in a community of 4,200 persons (1). The age range of the 135 patients is 18–57 years (mean = 35 years; median = 32 years); 74 (54.8%) are male. A small number of pregnant women were diagnosed with HIV infection and started on antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy. As of April 21, no infants had tested positive for HIV. Of the 135 persons with diagnosed HIV infection, 108 (80.0%) have reported injection drug use (IDU), four (3.0%) have reported no IDU, and 23 (17.0%) have not been interviewed to determine IDU status. Among the 108 who have reported IDU, all reported dissolving and injecting tablets of oxymorphone as their drug of choice. Some reported injecting other drugs, including methamphetamine and heroin. Ten (7.4%) female patients have been identified as commercial sex workers. Coinfection with hepatitis C virus has been diagnosed in 114 (84.4%) patients. The patients were interviewed about syringe-sharing and sex partners, as well as any social contacts who also might have engaged in high risk behaviors. Those interviewed reported an average of nine syringe-sharing partners, sex partners, or other social contacts who might be at risk for HIV infection. Of the 373 contacts named as of April 21, a total of 247 (66.2%) had been located, 230 (61.7%) were tested, and 17 (4.6%) either declined testing or were not able to be tested. Of the 230 contacts who were tested, test results for 109 (47.4%) were HIV positive, and 121 (52.6%) were HIV negative. Of the 128 contacts who have not yet been located, 74 (57.8%) have been identified as syringe-sharing or sex partners, and 54 (42.2%) are social contacts regarded as at high risk for HIV infection. Injection drug use in this community is a multi-generational activity, with as many as three generations of a family and multiple community members injecting together. IDU practices include crushing and cooking extended-release oxymorphone, most frequently 40 mg tablets not designed to resist crushing or dissolving. Syringes and drug preparation equipment are frequently shared (e.g., the drug is dissolved in nonsterile water and drawn up into an insulin syringe that is usually shared with others). The reported daily numbers of injections ranged from four to 15, with the reported number of injection partners ranging from one to six per injection event. Like many other rural counties in the United States, the county has substantial unemployment (8.9%), a high proportion of adults who have not completed high school (21.3%), a substantial proportion of the population living in poverty (19%), and limited access to health care (1). This county consistently ranks among the lowest in the state for health indicators and life expectancy (2). ISDH worked with the only health care provider in the immediate community, local health officials, law enforcement, community partners, regional health care providers and CDC to launch a comprehensive response to this outbreak. A public health emergency was declared on March 26 by executive order (3). The response has included a public education campaign, establishment of an incident command center and a community outreach center, short-term authorization of syringe exchange, and support for comprehensive medical care including HIV and hepatitis C virus care and treatment as well as substance abuse counseling and treatment. State and local health departments and academic partners, with the assistance of CDC, are working to implement and improve the community outreach programs supported by the executive order and to interrupt IDU-related HIV and hepatitis C virus transmission. Contact tracing by state and CDC disease intervention specialists continues to identify those potentially exposed. This HIV outbreak involves a rural population, historically at low risk for HIV, in which HIV infection spread rapidly within a large network of persons who injected prescription opioids. The Indiana public health response includes implementing programs to contain the spread of HIV and hepatitis C virus, curb injection drug use, and concurrently build social resilience in the community. The outbreak highlights the vulnerability of many rural, resource-poor populations to drug use, misuse, and addiction, in the context of a high prevalence of unaddressed comorbid conditions (4). The outbreak also demonstrates the importance of timely HIV and Hepatitis C surveillance activities and rapid response to interrupt disease transmission. Finally, the outbreak points to the need for expanded mental health and substance use treatment programs in medically underserved rural areas (5).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                7513587
                3445
                Drug Alcohol Depend
                Drug Alcohol Depend
                Drug and alcohol dependence
                0376-8716
                1879-0046
                10 February 2019
                26 April 2018
                01 July 2018
                01 July 2019
                : 188
                : 187-192
                Affiliations
                [a ]Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
                [b ]Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University, 801 E. 7th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
                [c ]Indiana Prevention Research Center, Indiana University,501 N. Morton St. Suite 110, Bloomington, IN 47404, USA
                [d ]HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University Medical Center and New York Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr. #15, New York, NY 10032, USA
                [e ]Social Intervention Group, Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA
                [f ]Larkin University College of Pharmacy, 18301 N. Miami Ave. Suite 1, Miami, FL 33169, USA
                [g ]Butler University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 4600 Sunset Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA
                [h ]Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University, 501 N. Morton St. Suite 104, Bloomington, IN 47404, USA
                [i ]Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, 530 W. New York St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
                Author notes

                Contributors

                Meyerson, Agley, Shannon, Ryder, Ritchie and Gassman conceived of the study and developed the instrument. Meyerson obtained funding for the study and directed all aspects of the study. Agley and Shannon gathered the data. Agley, Jayawardene, Shannon, Davis and Meyerson conducted the data analysis. Meyerson led the manuscript development. Meyerson, Hoss, Jayawardene and Agley revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the submitted and revised manuscript.

                [* ]Corresponding author at: Indiana University School of Public Health – Bloomington 1025 E. 7th St., Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. bmeyerso@ 123456indiana.edu (B.E. Meyerson).
                Article
                NIHMS1011033
                10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.032
                6375076
                29778772
                8c5454e8-9ace-4f85-8dc0-271085d3d866

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Health & Social care
                naloxone access,opioid overdose reversal,pharmacy practice,public health law

                Comments

                Comment on this article