10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of the Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy versus Surgical Treatment for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Propensity Score Matching

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgical treatment for stage I–II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This retrospective analysis included 879 patients with primary NSCLC who underwent SBRT or surgical treatment in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China from January 2012 to December 2017. Results: Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between the two groups. Each group included 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up in the SBRT and surgery groups was 30.8 and 48.4 months, respectively. In the SBRT group, the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98.5 and 83.9%, respectively. In the surgery group, these rates were 98.5 and 89.4%, respectively ( P = .248). The 3-year cancer-specific survival rates in the SBRT and surgery groups were 89.1 and 95.2%, respectively ( P = .056). Conclusions: In these propensity score matched early-stage NSCLC patients, the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates associated with SBRT were similar to those observed with surgery. In addition, there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival between the two groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.

          It has been reported that limited resection (segment or wedge) is equivalent to lobectomy in the management of early stage (T1-2 N0) non-small cell lung cancer. A prospective, multiinstitutional randomized trial was instituted comparing limited resection with lobectomy for patients with peripheral T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer documented at operation. Analysis included locoregional and distant recurrence rates, 5-year survival rates, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and late pulmonary function assessment. There were 276 patients randomized, with 247 patients eligible for analysis. There were no significant differences for all stratification variables, selected prognostic factors, perioperative morbidity, mortality, or late pulmonary function. In patients undergoing limited resection, there was an observed 75% increase in recurrence rates (p = 0.02, one-sided) attributable to an observed tripling of the local recurrence rate (p = 0.008 two-sided), an observed 30% increase in overall death rate (p = 0.08, one-sided), and an observed 50% increase in death with cancer rate (p = 0.09, one-sided) compared to patients undergoing lobectomy (p = 0.10, one-sided was the predefined threshold for statistical significance for this equivalency study). Compared with lobectomy, limited pulmonary resection does not confer improved perioperative morbidity, mortality, or late postoperative pulmonary function. Because of the higher death rate and locoregional recurrence rate associated with limited resection, lobectomy still must be considered the surgical procedure of choice for patients with peripheral T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: can SBRT be comparable to surgery?

            To review treatment outcomes for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in medically operable patients with Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), using a Japanese multi-institutional database. Between 1995 and 2004, a total of 87 patients with Stage I NSCLC (median age, 74 years; T1N0M0, n=65; T2N0M0, n=22) who were medically operable but refused surgery were treated using SBRT alone in 14 institutions. Stereotactic three-dimensional treatment was performed using noncoplanar dynamic arcs or multiple static ports. Total dose was 45-72.5 Gy at the isocenter, administered in 3-10 fractions. Median calculated biological effective dose was 116 Gy (range, 100-141 Gy). Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. During follow-up (median, 55 months), cumulative local control rates for T1 and T2 tumors at 5 years after SBRT were 92% and 73%, respectively. Pulmonary complications above Grade 2 arose in 1 patient (1.1%). Five-year overall survival rates for Stage IA and IB subgroups were 72% and 62%, respectively. One patient who developed local recurrences safely underwent salvage surgery. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe and promising as a radical treatment for operable Stage I NSCLC. The survival rate for SBRT is potentially comparable to that for surgery. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prospective Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Both Operable and Inoperable T1N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0403.

              To evaluate, in Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 0403, the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transl Oncol
                Transl Oncol
                Translational Oncology
                Neoplasia Press
                1936-5233
                27 May 2019
                August 2019
                27 May 2019
                : 12
                : 8
                : 1032-1037
                Affiliations
                [* ]School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
                []Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Key Lab of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310011, China
                []Department of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Zhejiang Key Lab of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital l, Hangzhou 310011, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Address all correspondence to: Chen M, No.1, East Banshan Road, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022 or Cao J, No. 199 Ren'ai Rd, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123. chenming@ 123456zjcc.org.cn jpcao@ 123456suda.edu.cn
                Article
                S1936-5233(19)30090-7
                10.1016/j.tranon.2019.04.015
                6542747
                31146166
                8c823e80-8dee-4ffd-90ad-0e1421b754af
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 February 2019
                : 17 April 2019
                : 17 April 2019
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article