8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      545. A Retrospective Review of 30-day Mortalities in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients (SOT) versus Non-Transplant Patients (NTP) Receiving Remdesivir (REM) and Dexamethasone (DEX) for COVID-19 Pneumonia

      abstract
      , PharmD, RPh, , PharmD, , MS, , MD, MBA, , PharmD, RPh, , MD, , MD
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Treating COVID-19 infection in SOT is challenging due to long-term use of immunosuppressive agents. REM is the only FDA-approved anti-viral for SARS-COV-2 infection. DEX showed decrease in mortality in the Recovery Trial. COVID-19 treatment guidelines for SOT patients are the same as NTP despite limited literature on those outcomes. Our primary objective was to determine if 30-day mortality was different between SOT and NTP matched cohorts using these 2 drugs. The secondary objectives included comparisons of length of stay (LOS), days on mechanical ventilation (DMV), and the use of other treatment modalities.

          Methods

          We retrospectively collected data for hospitalized SOT and NTP, 18 years and older, with pcr-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving REM and DEX from May 1, 2020, to October 10, 2020, at Mayo Clinic Florida. IRB approval was obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Continuous variables were summarized as mean (standard deviation) or median (range) where appropriate, while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage).

          Results

          Of 80 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 28 were SOT, and 52 were NTP. The SOT cohort was subcategorized below:

          Characteristics Number of SOT (n = 28)
          Transplant Type
          Kidney n (%) 15 (53.7)
          Lung n (%) 3 (10.7)
          Liver n (%) 2 (7.1)
          Heart n (%) 6 (21.4)
          Multi-organ n (%) 2 (7.1)

          SOT patients were significantly younger than NTP (p < .001). Further, SOT patients had significantly longer LOS (p = 0.043) and more COVID-19 modalities (75% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.002) compared to NTP. Among the 28 SOT patients, 2 of them died within 30 days of admission, and among the 52 NTP patients, 7 of them died within 30 days. The 30-d survival estimate for SOT group is 92.9% (95% CI: 83.8% - 100.0%) and for NTP group is 86.5% (95% CI: 77.7% - 96.3%). The log-rank test was not significant between the groups (p=0.37), but the NTP has a worse survival curve from the figure below.

          SOT-NTP Survival Curve

          Conclusion

          SOT group was younger, had longer LOS, and more COVID-related modalities. The 30-d survival estimate for SOT group is 92.9% and for NTP group is 86.5%, but the survival curve for NTP was worse likely secondary to age. Use of REM & DEX in SOT recipients is a valid recommendation.

          Disclosures

          Claudia R. Libertin, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support)

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          November 2021
          04 December 2021
          04 December 2021
          : 8
          : Suppl 1 , IDWeek 2021 Abstracts
          : S374-S375
          Affiliations
          Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
          Article
          ofab466.744
          10.1093/ofid/ofab466.744
          8644915
          8cdc29bd-f4f9-48d3-8ebd-cc1f8c5bac19
          © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 2
          Categories
          Poster Abstracts
          AcademicSubjects/MED00290

          Comments

          Comment on this article