11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Human Errors and Adverse Hemodynamic Events Related to “Push Dose Pressors” in the Emergency Department

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Though the use of small bolus doses of vasopressors, termed “push dose pressors,” has become common in emergency medicine, data examining this practice are scant. Push dose pressors frequently involve bedside dilution, which may result in errors and adverse events. The objective of this study was to assess for instances of human error and adverse hemodynamic events during push dose pressor use in the emergency department. This was a structured chart and video review of all patients age ≥ 16 years undergoing resuscitation and receiving push dose pressors from a single center from January 2010 to November 2017. Push dose pressors were defined as intended intravenous boluses of phenylephrine (any dose) or epinephrine (≤ 100 mcg). A total of 249 patients were analyzed. Median age was 60 years (range, 16–97), 58% were male, 49% survived to discharge. Median initial epinephrine dose was 20 mcg ( n  = 139, IQR 10–100, range 1–100); median phenylephrine dose was 100 mcg ( n  = 110, IQR 100–100, range 25–10,000). Adverse hemodynamic events occurred in 98 patients (39%); 30 in the phenylephrine group (27%; 95% CI, 19–36%), and 68 in the epinephrine group (50%; 95% CI, 41–58%). Human errors were observed in 47 patients (19%), including 7 patients (3%) experiencing dosing errors (all overdoses; range, 2.5- to 100-fold) and 43 patients (17%) with a documentation error. Only one dosing error occurred when a pharmacist was present. Human errors and adverse hemodynamic events were common with the use of push dose pressors in the emergency department. Adverse hemodynamic events were more common than in previous studies. Future research should determine if push dose pressors improve outcomes and if so, how to safely implement them into practice. The online version of this article (10.1007/s13181-019-00716-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

          Medical chart reviews are often used in emergency medicine research. However, the reliability of data abstracted by chart reviews is seldom examined critically. The objective of this investigation was to determine the proportion of emergency medicine research articles that use data from chart reviews and the proportions that report methods of case selection, abstractor training, monitoring and blinding, and interrater agreement. Research articles published in three emergency medicine journals from January 1989 through December 1993 were identified. The articles that used chart reviews were analyzed. Of 986 original research articles that were identified, 244 (25%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 28%) relied on chart reviews. Inclusion criteria were described in 98% (95% CI, 96% to 99%), and 73% (95% CI, 67% to 79%) defined the variables being analyzed. Other methods were seldom mentioned: abstractor training, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 23%); standardized abstraction forms, 11% (95% CI, 7% to 15%); periodic abstractor monitoring, 4% (95% CI, 2% to 7%); and abstractor blinding to study hypotheses, 3% (95% CI, 1% to 6%). Interrater reliability was mentioned in 5% (95% CI, 3% to 9%) and tested statistically in .4% (95% CI, 0% to 2%). A 15% random sample of articles was reassessed by a second investigator; interrater agreement was high for all eight criteria. Chart review is a common method of data collection in emergency medicine research. Yet, information about the quality of the data is usually lacking. Chart reviews should be held to higher methodologic standards, or the conclusions of these studies may be in error.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hypotension, Hypoxia, and Head Injury

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The frequency and significance of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management.

              Arterial hypotension is a recognized complication of emergency intubation, but the consequence of this event is poorly described. Our aim was to identify the incidence of postintubation hypotension (PIH) after emergency intubation and to determine its association with inhospital mortality. Retrospective cohort study of tracheal intubations performed in a large, urban emergency department over a 1-year period. Patients were included if they were older than 17 years and had no systolic blood pressure measurements less than 90 mm Hg for 30 consecutive minutes before intubation. Patients were analyzed in 2 groups, those with PIH, defined as any recorded systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg within 60 minutes of intubation, and those with no PIH. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality. Of 465 patients who underwent emergency intubation, 336 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Postintubation hypotension occurred in 79 (23%) of 336 patients. Patients with PIH had significantly higher inhospital mortality (33% vs 21%; 95% confidence interval for 12% difference, 1%-23%) and longer mean intensive care length of stay (LOS) (9.7 vs 5.9 days, P < .01) and hospital LOS (17.0 vs 11.4 days, P < .01). Postintubation hypotension remained a significant predictor of inhospital mortality after adjusting for confounding using multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5). Postintubation hypotension occurs in almost one quarter of normotensive patients undergoing emergency intubation. Postintubation hypotension is independently associated with higher inhospital mortality and longer intensive care unit and hospital LOS. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Medical Toxicology
                J. Med. Toxicol.
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1556-9039
                1937-6995
                October 2019
                July 3 2019
                October 2019
                : 15
                : 4
                : 276-286
                Article
                10.1007/s13181-019-00716-z
                6825064
                31270748
                8d8a1b33-bb50-41e3-ab86-5284d2085e3a
                © 2019

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article