14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants of Weight Gain in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          Identify determinants of weight gain in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) allocated to intensive versus standard glycemic control in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          We studied determinants of weight gain over 2 years in 8,929 participants (4,425 intensive arm and 4,504 standard arm) with T2DM in the ACCORD trial. We used general linear models to examine the association between each baseline characteristic and weight change at the 2-year visit. We fit a linear regression of change in weight and A1C and used general linear models to examine the association between each medication at baseline and weight change at the 2-year visit, stratified by glycemia allocation.

          RESULTS

          There was significantly more weight gain in the intensive glycemia arm of the trial compared with the standard arm (3.0 ± 7.0 vs. 0.3 ± 6.3 kg). On multivariate analysis, younger age, male sex, Asian race, no smoking history, high A1C, baseline BMI of 25–35, high waist circumference, baseline insulin use, and baseline metformin use were independently associated with weight gain over 2 years. Reduction of A1C from baseline was consistently associated with weight gain only when baseline A1C was elevated. Medication usage accounted for <15% of the variability of weight change, with initiation of thiazolidinedione (TZD) use the most prominent factor. Intensive participants who never took insulin or a TZD had an average weight loss of 2.9 kg during the first 2 years of the trial. In contrast, intensive participants who had never previously used insulin or TZD but began this combination after enrolling in the ACCORD trial had a weight gain of 4.6–5.3 kg at 2 years.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Weight gain in ACCORD was greater with intensive than with standard treatment and generally associated with reduction of A1C from elevated baseline values. Initiation of TZD and/or insulin therapy was the most important medication-related factor associated with weight gain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intensive insulin therapy and weight gain in IDDM.

          Intensive insulin therapy is frequently complicated by excessive weight gain. The purpose of this study was to determine the cause and composition of this weight gain. Therefore, changes in body composition, energy expenditure, glycosuria, and substrate kinetics were evaluated in patients with IDDM who transferred from conventional insulin therapy to intensive insulin therapy. Six adult patients with IDDM were studied on conventional insulin therapy and after 2 mo of intensive insulin therapy while maintaining constant caloric intake and were compared with a group of 6 matched nondiabetic volunteers. Body composition was determined by underwater weighing. Energy expenditure was measured during 24-h stays in a whole-room calorimeter. Whole-body turnover rates of glucose, glycerol, palmitate, and leucine were determined by isotope dilution methods. Intensive insulin therapy lowered the mean daily blood glucose concentration and HbA1 (14.8 +/- 1.6 to 7.7 +/- 0.6 mM and 12.9 +/- 0.9 to 9.6 +/- 0.6%, both P < 0.01) and almost eliminated glycosuria (428 +/- 116 to 39 +/- 22 mmol/day, P < 0.05). Body weight increased 2.6 +/- 0.8 kg with intensive insulin therapy (P < 0.05) as a result of an increase in fat mass (2.4 +/- 0.8 kg, P < 0.05). Daily energy expenditure decreased 5% (118 +/- 32 kcal/day) with intensive insulin therapy (P < 0.05). The rates of glucose, glycerol, free fatty acid, and leucine turnover, triglyceride/free fatty acid cycling, and nonoxidative glucose and protein disposal were reduced in the diabetic volunteers during intensive insulin therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Weight gain during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

            In patients with diabetes, the benefits of tight glycemic control are unequivocal--delayed onset and progression of complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. However, intensive therapy with insulin and some oral antidiabetic agents come at the price of weight gain, a condition that can prevent attainment of tight glycemic goals and probably limits success of treatment. Insulin-related weight gain has been attributed to anabolic effects of insulin, appetite increases, and reduction of glycosuria. Use of metformin in combination with insulin is commonly recommended as a way to limit weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes, and other new oral therapies and insulin analogs may also provide weight-control advantages. Lifestyle interventions (patient education about diet and exercise) promote weight loss in the short-term, but have not sustained weight control over long-term intervals. For lasting weight control, such interventions may need to continue throughout the course of treatment. Likewise, weight-loss agents, such as sibutramine and orlistat promote short-term weight loss, but no follow-up studies have yet demonstrated that this loss can be maintained for 5 years or longer. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment recognized to have lasting effects on weight control, but its use is limited at present to those who are morbidly obese.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating food intake and body weight.

              In the field of obesity research, two separate lines of study have emerged which explore the mechanism by which food intake is regulated: short-term control of food intake, and the central regulation of energy balance. The former studies the satiety response during consumption of meals, whereby satiety signalling originating in the gut is transduced into a neural signal that modulates satiety pathways in the brainstem. This review describes a neuroanatomically based model in which leptin and insulin signalling in the hypothalamus governs long-term regulation of energy balance via mechanisms that are integrated with satiety hormone signalling in the brainstem. The functional outcome of this integration is a cumulative meal-to-meal regulation of food intake, that over relatively long intervals serves to maintain stable adipose stores. Our model provides a context within which continued investigation of neuroendocrine mechanisms that control food intake and body weight can be explored, and has potential application to our current understanding of clinical obesity and its treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                August 2013
                11 July 2013
                : 36
                : 8
                : 2162-2168
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
                [2] 2Metro Health Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
                [3] 3Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and the Cincinnati Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [4] 4Statistics Collaborative, Inc., Washington, DC
                [5] 5Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
                [6] 6McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                [7] 7Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
                [8] 8Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
                [9] 9Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
                [10] 10Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Vivian Fonseca, vfonseca@ 123456tulane.edu .
                Article
                1391
                10.2337/dc12-1391
                3714487
                23412077
                8e719dda-2735-45db-a1c3-a939a877c93c
                © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

                History
                : 12 July 2012
                : 8 January 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article