15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Consequences of Contention: Understanding the Aftereffects of Political Conflict and Violence

      1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Annual Review of Political Science
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What are the political and economic consequences of contention (i.e., genocide, civil war, state repression/human rights violation, terrorism, and protest)? Despite a significant amount of interest as well as quantitative research, the literature on this subject remains underdeveloped and imbalanced across topic areas. To date, investigations have been focused on particular forms of contention and specific consequences. While this research has led to some important insights, substantial limitations—as well as opportunities for future development—remain. In particular, there is a need for simultaneously investigating a wider range of consequences (beyond democracy and economic development), a wider range of contentious activity (beyond civil war, protest, and terrorism), a wider range of units of analysis (beyond the nation year), and a wider range of empirical approaches in order to handle particular difficulties confronting this type of inquiry (beyond ordinary least-squares regression). Only then will we have a better and more comprehensive understanding of what contention does and does not do politically and economically. This review takes stock of existing research and lays out an approach for looking at the problem using a more comprehensive perspective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The coevolution of parochial altruism and war.

            Altruism-benefiting fellow group members at a cost to oneself-and parochialism-hostility toward individuals not of one's own ethnic, racial, or other group-are common human behaviors. The intersection of the two-which we term "parochial altruism"-is puzzling from an evolutionary perspective because altruistic or parochial behavior reduces one's payoffs by comparison to what one would gain by eschewing these behaviors. But parochial altruism could have evolved if parochialism promoted intergroup hostilities and the combination of altruism and parochialism contributed to success in these conflicts. Our game-theoretic analysis and agent-based simulations show that under conditions likely to have been experienced by late Pleistocene and early Holocene humans, neither parochialism nor altruism would have been viable singly, but by promoting group conflict, they could have evolved jointly.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Political Science
                Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.
                Annual Reviews
                1094-2939
                1545-1577
                May 11 2019
                May 11 2019
                : 22
                : 1
                : 361-377
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA;
                [2 ]Peace Research Institute Oslo, 0134 Oslo, Norway;
                [3 ]Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, 753 20 Uppsala, Sweden;
                [4 ]Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada;
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-064057
                8e90296f-d42e-4c93-acf2-46ae740d81cc
                © 2019
                History

                Social policy & Welfare,Political science,Psychology,Law
                Social policy & Welfare, Political science, Psychology, Law

                Comments

                Comment on this article