7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Postpartum women’s psychological experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modified recurrent cross-sectional thematic analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          COVID-19 has placed additional stressors on mothers during an already vulnerable lifecourse transition. Initial social distancing restrictions (Timepoint 1; T1) and initial changes to those social distancing restrictions (Timepoint 2; T2) have disrupted postpartum access to practical and emotional support. This qualitative study explores the postpartum psychological experiences of UK women during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated ‘lockdowns’.

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 women, approximately 30 days after initial social distancing guidelines were imposed in the UK (22 April 2020). A separate 12 women were interviewed approximately 30 days after the initial easing of social distancing restrictions (10 June 2020). Data were transcribed verbatim, uploaded into NVivo for management and analysis, which followed a recurrent cross-sectional approach to thematic analysis.

          Results

          Two main themes were identified for T1: ‘ Motherhood is Much Like Lockdown’ and ‘ A Self-Contained Family Unit’. Each main T1 theme contained two sub-themes. Two main themes were also identified for T2: ‘Incongruously Held Views of COVID-19’ and ‘Mothering Amidst the Pandemic’. Each main T2 theme contained three sub-themes. Comparisons between data gathered at each timepoint identified increased emotional distress over time. Current findings call for the improvement of postpartum care by improving accessibility to social support, and prioritising the re-opening of schools, and face-to-face healthcare appointments and visitation.

          Conclusion

          Social distancing restrictions associated with COVID-19 have had a cumulative, negative effect on postpartum mental health. Recommendations such as: Allowing mothers to ‘bubble’ with a primary support provider even at their healthcare appointments; allowing one support partner to attend all necessary healthcare appointments; and providing tailored informational resources, may help to support postpartum emotional wellbeing during this, and similar health crises in the future.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04071-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.

              In interview studies, sample size is often justified by interviewing participants until reaching 'data saturation'. However, there is no agreed method of establishing this. We propose principles for deciding saturation in theory-based interview studies (where conceptual categories are pre-established by existing theory). First, specify a minimum sample size for initial analysis (initial analysis sample). Second, specify how many more interviews will be conducted without new ideas emerging (stopping criterion). We demonstrate these principles in two studies, based on the theory of planned behaviour, designed to identify three belief categories (Behavioural, Normative and Control), using an initial analysis sample of 10 and stopping criterion of 3. Study 1 (retrospective analysis of existing data) identified 84 shared beliefs of 14 general medical practitioners about managing patients with sore throat without prescribing antibiotics. The criterion for saturation was achieved for Normative beliefs but not for other beliefs or studywise saturation. In Study 2 (prospective analysis), 17 relatives of people with Paget's disease of the bone reported 44 shared beliefs about taking genetic testing. Studywise data saturation was achieved at interview 17. We propose specification of these principles for reporting data saturation in theory-based interview studies. The principles may be adaptable for other types of studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Leanne.Jackson@liverpool.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                17 September 2021
                17 September 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 625
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, , University of Liverpool, ; Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 7ZA UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-1802
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-3468
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-4586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-2568
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
                Article
                4071
                10.1186/s12884-021-04071-2
                8445650
                34530772
                8f0762c8-c013-4bf4-824a-d7a0c403b3a1
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 May 2021
                : 24 August 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                covid-19,postnatal care,burnout, psychological,psychosocial support systems,mental health services,psychological distress

                Comments

                Comment on this article