283
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modified Hughes procedure for reconstruction of large full-thickness lower eyelid defects following tumor resection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Tarsoconjunctival flap advancement, or the Hughes procedure, is among the techniques of choice for reconstructing full-thickness lower eyelid defects so as to restore normal anatomy and function with the best possible cosmetic outcome. The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of a series of patients treated with a modified Hughes procedure following malignant tumor removal.

          Methods

          This retrospective study included 45 consecutive cases of modified Hughes procedures performed between January 2013 and October 2015. During Hughes flap creation an incisional plane was chosen in all cases, which left Müller’s muscle attached to the superior tarsal margin, while disinserting the levator aponeurosis. All cases were grouped according to the horizontal length of the lower lid defect to be reconstructed, as well as to the type of anterior lamella reconstruction (free graft vs. inferiorly based advancement flap). Grouped data were compared for the rate of surgical success, defined as achievement of normal lid function and satisfactory cosmesis without needing further surgical interventions, and for the frequency of specific complications.

          Results

          Surgical success was achieved in 39 cases (87 %). The remaining cases required additional surgery for minor complications including lower-lid ectropion (4 %), pyogenic granuloma (4 %), or lower lid margin hypertrophy (2 %). Donor-site complications were not detected apart from one case of mild entropion with focal trichiasis. No case of premature flap rupture was seen. Neither the horizontal length of the lower lid defect ( p = 0.489), nor the type of anterior lamella reconstruction ( p = 0.349) significantly affected the surgical success. Particularly, there was no increased onset of lower-lid ectropion among patients receiving an advancement flap.

          Conclusions

          The modified Hughes procedure remains a well-suited technique for reconstructing lower eyelid defects involving up to 100 % of the horizontal lid length. Leaving Müller’s muscle attached to the Hughes flap might prevent premature flap dehiscence without increasing the frequency of upper lid retractions in turn. Whether using a free skin graft or a skin-muscle advancement flap for anterior lamella reconstruction, seems to be insignificant for the functional-aesthetical outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Total lower lid reconstruction: technical details.

          W Hughes (1976)
          The main complications of this type of lower lid reconstruction are lash loss or malposition, entropion of the upper lid, upper lid retraction, undue laxity of the lower lid, and lid margin deformities. These can all be avioded by meticulous attention to surgical details and dressing techniques. I believe that this is the best and simplest method of providing a lid of acceptable function and appearance. The advantages of this type of operation are: (1) The new lower lid is constructed of lid tissue including the tarsus and conjunctiva from the upper lid. (2) The function and appearance of the new lower lid are acceptable with practically no tendency to late retraction. (3) The function and appearance of the upper lid need not be interfered with. (4) No external scars are produced except when a lash transplant is done. This transplant leaves a small, hardly noticeable scar in the lower part of the opposite brow. (5) The technique is relatively simple and well within the realm of any well-trained ophthalmic surgeon. The obvious disadvantages are the surgeon's inability to inspect the eye for two to four months and the inconvenience to the patient of having one eye closed for such a long period of time.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modification of the Mustardé and Hughes methods of reconstructing the lower lid.

            Reconstruction of the lower lid often is a greater task than originally anticipated in preoperative evaluations. The Mustardé and Hughes methods are commonly used for extensive lower lid reconstruction. Certain difficulties encountered in these methods may be minimized by variations in the basic techniques. Structural support for a Mustardé flap may be provided by a free tarsal conjunctival graft rather than a nasal septal cartilage mucosa graft. Late complications following the Hughes procedure include upper lid retraction and entropion. These may be minimized by removing Mueller's muscle from the flap at the time of the original dissection. The Hughes flap may be lysed in 3 to 4 weeks. Lid margin abnormalities, which occur occasionally, are corrected with minor modifications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The dehiscent Hughes flap: outcomes and implications.

              The modified Hughes procedure is used to reconstruct full-thickness lower eyelid defects. A tarsoconjunctival flap from the upper eyelid replaces the posterior lamella, whereas a skin graft, a skin flap, or a skin-muscle flap restores the anterior lamella. The conjunctival pedicle from the upper eyelid is divided after vascularization of the reconstructed lower eyelid is judged to be adequate (traditionally, at least 3 weeks postoperatively). This study reviews the outcomes of patients in whom the conjunctival flap prematurely dehisced.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dr.ahmed.mahmoudh@hotmail.com
                konrad.koch@uk-koeln.de
                mario.matthaei@uk-koeln.de
                boelke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
                claus.cursiefen@uk-koeln.de
                ludwig.heindl@uk-koeln.de
                Journal
                Eur J Med Res
                Eur. J. Med. Res
                European Journal of Medical Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                0949-2321
                2047-783X
                30 June 2016
                30 June 2016
                2016
                : 21
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiology and Radiooncology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
                Article
                221
                10.1186/s40001-016-0221-1
                4929749
                27364344
                8f3f2f93-3522-437e-b6b9-9de9a1110c80
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 January 2016
                : 22 June 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: 2240
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                hughes flap,tarsoconjunctival flap,modified hughes procedure,oculoplastic surgery,lower eyelid tumor

                Comments

                Comment on this article