48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapy with BMN 110 (elosulfase alfa) for Morquio A syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis IVA): a phase 3 randomised placebo-controlled study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess the efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with BMN 110 (elosulfase alfa) in patients with Morquio A syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis IVA).

          Methods

          Patients with Morquio A aged ≥5 years ( N = 176) were randomised (1:1:1) to receive elosulfase alfa 2.0 mg/kg/every other week (qow), elosulfase alfa 2.0 mg/kg/week (weekly) or placebo for 24 weeks in this phase 3, double-blind, randomised study. The primary efficacy measure was 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance. Secondary efficacy measures were 3-min stair climb test (3MSCT) followed by change in urine keratan sulfate (KS). Various exploratory measures included respiratory function tests. Patient safety was also evaluated.

          Results

          At week 24, the estimated mean effect on the 6MWT versus placebo was 22.5 m (95 % CI 4.0, 40.9; P = 0.017) for weekly and 0.5 m (95 % CI −17.8, 18.9; P = 0.954) for qow. The estimated mean effect on 3MSCT was 1.1 stairs/min (95 % CI −2.1, 4.4; P = 0.494) for weekly and −0.5 stairs/min (95 % CI −3.7, 2.8; P = 0.778) for qow. Normalised urine KS was reduced at 24 weeks in both regimens. In the weekly dose group, 22.4 % of patients had adverse events leading to an infusion interruption/discontinuation requiring medical intervention (only 1.3 % of all infusions in this group) over 6 months. No adverse events led to permanent treatment discontinuation.

          Conclusions

          Elosulfase alfa improved endurance as measured by the 6MWT in the weekly but not qow dose group, did not improve endurance on the 3MSCT, reduced urine KS, and had an acceptable safety profile.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10545-014-9715-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension.

          Primary pulmonary hypertension is a progressive disease for which no treatment has been shown in a prospective, randomized trial to improve survival. We conducted a 12-week prospective, randomized, multicenter open trial comparing the effects of the continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol (formerly called prostacyclin) plus conventional therapy with those of conventional therapy alone in 81 patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Exercise capacity was improved in the 41 patients treated with epoprostenol (median distance walked in six minutes, 362 m at 12 weeks vs. 315 m at base line), but it decreased in the 40 patients treated with conventional therapy alone (204 m at 12 weeks vs. 270 m at base line; P < 0.002 for the comparison of the treatment groups). Indexes of the quality of life were improved only in the epoprostenol group (P < 0.01). Hemodynamics improved at 12 weeks in the epoprostenol-treated patients. The changes in mean pulmonary-artery pressure for the epoprostenol and control groups were -8 percent and +3 percent, respectively (difference in mean change, -6.7 mm Hg; 95 percent confidence interval, -10.7 to -2.6 mm Hg; P < 0.002), and the mean changes in pulmonary vascular resistance for the epoprostenol and control groups were -21 percent and +9 percent, respectively (difference in mean change, -4.9 mm Hg/liter/min; 95 percent confidence interval, -7.6 to -2.3 mm Hg/liter/min; P < 0.001). Eight patients died during the study, all of whom had been randomly assigned to conventional therapy (P = 0.003). Serious complications included four episodes of catheter-related sepsis and one thrombotic event. As compared with conventional therapy, the continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol produced symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement, as well as improved survival in patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials.

              One of the most important considerations in designing clinical trials is the choice of outcome measures. These outcome measures could be clinically meaningful endpoints that are direct measures of how patients feel, function, and survive. Alternatively, indirect measures, such as biomarkers that include physical signs of disease, laboratory measures, and radiological tests, often are considered as replacement endpoints or 'surrogates' for clinically meaningful endpoints. We discuss the definitions of clinically meaningful endpoints and surrogate endpoints, and provide examples from recent clinical trials. We provide insight into why indirect measures such as biomarkers may fail to provide reliable evidence about the benefit-to-risk profile of interventions. We also discuss the nature of evidence that is important in assessing whether treatment effects on a biomarker reliably predict effects on a clinically meaningful endpoint, and provide insights into why this reliability is specific to the context of use of the biomarker.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44-161-2064365 , +44-161-2064036 , chris.hendriksz@srft.nhs.uk
                Journal
                J Inherit Metab Dis
                J. Inherit. Metab. Dis
                Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0141-8955
                1573-2665
                9 May 2014
                9 May 2014
                2014
                : 37
                : 6
                : 979-990
                Affiliations
                [ ]Birmingham Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
                [ ]Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
                [ ]Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
                [ ]Children’s Hospital and Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA USA
                [ ]Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
                [ ]Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, CMFT, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [ ]Mackay Memorial Hospital and Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
                [ ]Villa Metabolica, Centre for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, MC University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
                [ ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                [ ]Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades and IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France
                [ ]Medical Genetics Service/HCPA, Department of Genetics/UFRGS and INAGEMP, Porto Alegre, Brazil
                [ ]BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA USA
                [ ]Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Mark Holland Metabolic Unit, Salford Royal Foundation NHS Trust, Ladywell NW2- 2nd Floor Room 107, Salford, Manchester, M6 8HD UK
                Author notes

                Communicated by: Frits Wijburg

                Article
                9715
                10.1007/s10545-014-9715-6
                4206772
                24810369
                90252c36-a912-46ec-8348-b7d59fd1adf4
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 16 January 2014
                : 4 April 2014
                : 8 April 2014
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © SSIEM 2014

                Internal medicine
                Internal medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article