7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In Vitro Activity of Eravacycline against Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated in Clinical Laboratories Worldwide from 2013 to 2017

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Here, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline and comparator antimicrobial agents against a global collection of frequently encountered clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. The CLSI broth microdilution method was used to determine MIC data for isolates of Enterobacterales ( n = 13,983), Acinetobacter baumannii ( n = 2,097), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( n = 1,647), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ( n = 1,210) isolated primarily from respiratory, intra-abdominal, and urinary specimens by clinical laboratories in 36 countries from 2013 to 2017.

          ABSTRACT

          Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Here, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline and comparator antimicrobial agents against a global collection of frequently encountered clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. The CLSI broth microdilution method was used to determine MIC data for isolates of Enterobacterales ( n = 13,983), Acinetobacter baumannii ( n = 2,097), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( n = 1,647), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ( n = 1,210) isolated primarily from respiratory, intra-abdominal, and urinary specimens by clinical laboratories in 36 countries from 2013 to 2017. Susceptibilities were interpreted using both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were defined by resistance to agents from ≥3 different antimicrobial classes. The MIC 90s ranged from 0.25 to 1 μg/ml for Enterobacteriaceae and were 1 μg/ml for A. baumannii and 2 μg/ml for S. maltophilia, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens. Eravacycline’s potency was up to 4-fold greater than that of tigecycline against genera/species of Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia. The MIC 90s for five of six individual genera/species of Enterobacterales and A. baumannii were within 2-fold of the MIC 90s for their respective subsets of MDR isolates, while the MDR subpopulation of Klebsiella spp. demonstrated 4-fold higher MIC 90s. Eravacycline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the majority of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli, including MDR isolates, collected over a 5-year period. This study further underscores the potential benefit of eravacycline in the treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Antimicrobial resistance in the next 30 years, humankind, bugs and drugs: a visionary approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibacterial activity of eravacycline (TP-434), a novel fluorocycline, against hospital and community pathogens.

            Eravacycline (TP-434 or 7-fluoro-9-pyrrolidinoacetamido-6-demethyl-6-deoxytetracycline) is a novel fluorocycline that was evaluated for antimicrobial activity against panels of recently isolated aerobic and anaerobic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Eravacycline showed potent broad-spectrum activity against 90% of the isolates (MIC90) in each panel at concentrations ranging from ≤0.008 to 2 μg/ml for all species panels except those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cenocepacia (MIC90 values of 32 μg/ml for both organisms). The antibacterial activity of eravacycline was minimally affected by expression of tetracycline-specific efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms in clinical isolates. Furthermore, eravacycline was active against multidrug-resistant bacteria, including those expressing extended-spectrum β-lactamases and mechanisms conferring resistance to other classes of antibiotics, including carbapenem resistance. Eravacycline has the potential to be a promising new intravenous (i.v.)/oral antibiotic for the empirical treatment of complicated hospital/health care infections and moderate-to-severe community-acquired infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Monotherapy with fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

              The treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have in vitro activity against S. maltophilia; however, there is limited published information on their effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of FQs and SXT for the treatment of S. maltophilia. A retrospective review of 98 patients with S. maltophilia infections who received SXT or FQ monotherapy was conducted. Patients ≥18 years old with a positive culture for S. maltophilia and clinical signs of infection who received treatment for ≥48 h were included. Microbiological cure and clinical response were evaluated at the end of therapy (EOT). In-hospital mortality and isolation of nonsusceptible isolates were also evaluated. Thirty-five patients received SXT, and 63 patients received FQ; 48 patients received levofloxacin, and 15 patients received ciprofloxacin. The most common infection was pulmonary. The overall microbiological cure rate at EOT was 63%. Thirteen of 20 patients (65%) who received SXT and 23 of 37 patients (62%) who received FQ had microbiological cure at EOT (P = 0.832). The overall clinical success rate was 55%, 52% for those who received FQ and 61% for those who received SXT (P = 0.451). In-hospital mortality was 24%, with similar rates in the two groups (25% for FQ versus 22% for SXT; P = 0.546). Development of resistance on repeat culture was 30% for FQ and 20% for SXT (P = 0.426). Fluoroquinolone and SXT monotherapies may be equally effective for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections. Resistance was documented in subsequent isolates of S. maltophilia in both groups.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Antimicrob Agents Chemother
                Antimicrob. Agents Chemother
                aac
                aac
                AAC
                Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                0066-4804
                1098-6596
                16 December 2019
                21 February 2020
                March 2020
                21 February 2020
                : 64
                : 3
                : e01699-19
                Affiliations
                [a ]IHMA Europe Sàrl, Monthey, Switzerland
                [b ]Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA
                [c ]International Health Management Associates, Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois, USA
                [d ]Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
                [e ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
                [f ]Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Ian Morrissey, imorrissey@ 123456ihma.com .

                For a companion article on this topic, see [Related article:]https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01715-19.

                Citation Morrissey I, Olesky M, Hawser S, Lob SH, Karlowsky JA, Corey GR, Bassetti M, Fyfe C. 2020. In vitro activity of eravacycline against Gram-negative bacilli isolated in clinical laboratories worldwide from 2013 to 2017. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01699-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01699-19.

                Article
                01699-19
                10.1128/AAC.01699-19
                7038303
                31843999
                917b6d99-8a55-4d77-b5f0-a62aa9a004e1
                Copyright © 2020 Morrissey et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 22 August 2019
                : 8 October 2019
                : 9 December 2019
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 1, Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 12, Words: 9304
                Categories
                Epidemiology and Surveillance
                Custom metadata
                March 2020

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                eravacycline,multidrug resistant,mdr,gram negative,enterobacteriaceae,acinetobacter

                Comments

                Comment on this article