Blog
About

13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early intensive versus minimally invasive approach to postoperative hemodynamic management after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

      Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation

      Treatment Outcome, Administration, Intravenous, Time Factors, therapy, diagnosis, complications, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Severity of Illness Index, Postoperative Period, methods, instrumentation, Monitoring, Physiologic, Middle Aged, Male, Humans, Fluid Therapy, Female, Early Diagnosis, Disease Management, physiology, Central Venous Pressure, Cardiac Output, prevention & control, etiology, drug therapy, Brain Ischemia, Aged

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The results of previous studies suggest that early goal-directed fluid therapy (EGDT) reduces delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, but the effects of EGDT on clinical outcomes are still unclear. This study aimed to determine whether EGDT improves outcomes compared with standard less-invasive hemodynamic therapy. This study included 160 patients treated within 24 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage, randomized to receive either (1) EGDT guided by preload volume and cardiac output monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution (treatment group) or (2) standard therapy guided by fluid balance or central venous pressure, assisted by uncalibrated less-invasive cardiac output monitoring during hyperdynamic therapy in patients with clinical or radiological indications of DCI (control group). DCI determined by clinical or radiological findings and functional outcome determined by the modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months were compared between groups. For all clinical grades combined, there were no significant differences in the rates of DCI (33% versus 42%; P=0.33) or modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3 at 3 months (67% versus 57%; P=0.22) between the 2 groups. For patients with poor clinical grade, those who received EGDT had a significantly lower rate of DCI (5% versus 14%; P=0.036), modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3 at 3 months (52% versus 36%; P=0.026), and shorter length of intensive care unit stay (14 versus 17 days; P=0.043) than those who received standard therapy. EGDT is beneficial for reducing DCI and improving postoperative functional outcome in patients with poor clinical grade. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: UMIN000007509.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004739
          24692480

          Comments

          Comment on this article