0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brazilian airway surgery survey indicates low overall numbers and need for improved teaching skills

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES

          The Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgeons conducted an online survey to determine the number of surgeons that perform adult and paediatric airway surgery and to understand the practice patterns along the country.

          METHODS

          Active members were electronically invited to complete the questionnaire through the REDCap R platform. Invitations were sent from January to April 2020. The survey encompassed 40 questions that explored 4 different topics in the assessment of tracheal diseases: (i) surgeon’s demography; (ii) institutional profile, (iii) education and training in laryngo-tracheal surgery and (iv) preoperative and postoperative evaluation.

          RESULTS

          Eighty-nine percentage of the responders declared to perform tracheal surgery with a median of 5 tracheal resection procedures per year [interquartile range (IQR) 3–12]. Interaction with other specialties occurs in 37.3% of cases. Access to technology and devices is highly variable across the country. Resident training in airway surgery consists in traditional lectures in 97% of the cases. Training in animals (15.2%), cadavers (12.1%) and simulators (6.1%) are rare. Preoperatory evaluation encompasses flexible bronchoscopy (97.8%) and/or computed tomography (CT) scan of the airways (90.6%). Swallowing (20.1%) and voice (14.4%) disorders are rarely evaluated. Eighty-nine percentage of the surgeons consider bronchoscopy to be the preoperatory gold-standard exam, followed by CT scan (38.8%) and CT-3D reconstruction (37.4%).

          CONCLUSIONS

          Brazilian surgeons refer that airway resection and reconstruction are part of their current practice, but the total number of procedures per surgeon per year is low. Access to high-end technology and equipment is heterogenous. Training offered to residents in most academic institutions relies on traditional lectures.

          Abstract

          Surgery of the trachea is a highly specialized field.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anastomotic complications after tracheal resection: prognostic factors and management.

          We sought to identify risk factors for anastomotic complications after tracheal resection and to describe the management of these patients. This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 901 patients who underwent tracheal resection. The indications for tracheal resection were postintubation tracheal stenosis in 589 patients, tumor in 208, idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis in 83, and tracheoesophageal fistula in 21. Anastomotic complications occurred in 81 patients (9%). Eleven patients (1%) died after operation, 6 of anastomotic complications and 5 of other causes (odds ratio 13.0, P = .0001 for risk of death after anastomotic complication). At the end of treatment, 853 patients (95%) had a good result, whereas 37 patients (4%) had an airway maintained by tracheostomy or T-tube. The treatments of patients with an anastomotic complication were as follows: multiple dilations (n = 2), temporary tracheostomy (n = 7), temporary T-tube (n = 16), permanent tracheostomy (n = 14), permanent T-tube (n = 20), and reoperation (n = 16). Stepwise multivariable analysis revealed the following predictors of anastomotic complications: reoperation (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.69-5.43, P = .002), diabetes (odds ratio 3.32, 95% confidence interval 1.76-6.26, P = .002), lengthy (> or =4 cm) resections (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.35, P = .007), laryngotracheal resection (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.01, P = .03), age 17 years or younger (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.09-4.68, P = .03), and need for tracheostomy before operation (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.14, P = .04). Tracheal resection is usually successful and has a low mortality. Anastomotic complications are uncommon, and important risk factors are reoperation, diabetes, lengthy resections, laryngotracheal resections, young age (pediatric patients), and the need for tracheostomy before operation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predictors for postoperative complications after tracheal resection.

            Tracheal resection and anastomosis is the gold standard for the treatment of tracheal stenosis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the complications after tracheal resection for benign stenosis and the predicting factors for such complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Robotic Anatomical Segmentectomy: An Analysis of the Learning Curve

              Robotic segmentectomy has been suggested as a safe and effective management for early lung cancer and benign lung diseases. However, no large case series have documented the learning curve for this technically demanding procedure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
                Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
                icvts
                Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
                Oxford University Press
                2753-670X
                February 2024
                09 November 2023
                09 November 2023
                : 38
                : 2
                : ivad177
                Affiliations
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo, Brazil
                Hospital Municipal Vila Santa Catarina Dr. Gilson de Cássia Marques de Carvalho; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo, Brazil
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo, Brazil
                Hospital Municipal Vila Santa Catarina Dr. Gilson de Cássia Marques de Carvalho; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo, Brazil
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo, Brazil
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração (Incor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco 2, 7° Andar, Secretaria de Cirurgia Torácica, São Paulo, SP 05403-904, Brazil. Tel: +55 11 2661-5708; e-mail: benoitbibas@ 123456hotmail.com (B.J. Bibas).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-0505
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-4675
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-4165
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-5343
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-8708
                Article
                ivad177
                10.1093/icvts/ivad177
                10858343
                37950507
                91c27351-bcbe-4c85-9ecb-3d8137c9f06f
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 December 2022
                : 30 October 2023
                : 06 November 2023
                : 09 February 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Categories
                Thoracic Non-oncology
                Original Article
                Eacts/149
                Eacts/157
                AcademicSubjects/MED00920

                airway surgery,trachea,tracheal stenosis,survey,surgical education,resident training

                Comments

                Comment on this article