19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Syncope, Hypotension, and Falls in the Treatment of Hypertension: Results from the Randomized Clinical Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial : SYNCOPE, HYPOTENSION, AND FALLS IN THE SPRINT TRIAL

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e334">Background:</h5> <p id="P3">SPRINT found that treatment of systolic hypertension to a goal of &lt;120 mmHg reduces risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, even in older adults. But concern remains that older adults will have excess serious adverse events (SAEs). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e339">Objective:</h5> <p id="P4">To determine predictors of SAEs for syncope, hypotension, and falls, with particular attention to age, in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e344">Design:</h5> <p id="P5">Randomized clinical trial.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e349">Setting:</h5> <p id="P6">102 practices across the US and Puerto Rico.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e354">Participants:</h5> <p id="P7">9361 adults aged ≥50 years with SBP 130–180 mmHg and increased risk for cardiovascular disease events, but without diabetes, history of stroke, symptomatic heart failure or ejection fraction &lt;35%, dementia, or standing SBP &lt;110 mmHg. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e359">Intervention:</h5> <p id="P8">Treatment of SBP to a goal of &lt;120 vs &lt;140 mmHg.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e364">Measurements:</h5> <p id="P9">Outcomes were SAEs for syncope, hypotension, and falls. Predictors were treatment assignment, demographics, comorbidities, baseline measurements, and baseline use of cardiovascular medications. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e369">Results:</h5> <p id="P10">172 (1.8%) participants had SAEs for syncope, 155 (1.6%) for hypotension, and 203 (2.2%) for falls. Randomization to intensive SBP control was associated with greater risk of an SAE involving hypotension (HR 1.67 (1.21–2.32), p=.002), and possibly syncope (HR 1.32 (0.98–1.79), p=.07), but not falls (HR 0.98 (0.75–1.29), p=.90). Risk of all 3 outcomes was higher for participants with chronic kidney disease or frailty. Older age was also associated with greater risk of syncope, hypotension, and falls. However, there was no age by treatment interaction for any of the SAE outcomes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2879644e374">Conclusions:</h5> <p id="P11">Compared to the standard group, participants randomized to intensive systolic BP control were at higher risk for hypotension and possibly syncope, but not falls. The increased risk of developing these events associated with intensive treatment did not vary by age. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

          High blood pressure is an important public health concern because it is highly prevalent and a risk factor for adverse health outcomes, including coronary heart disease, stroke, decompensated heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and decline in cognitive function. Observational studies show a progressive increase in risk associated with blood pressure above 115/75 mm Hg. Prior research has shown that reducing elevated systolic blood pressure lowers the risk of subsequent clinical complications from cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal systolic blood pressure to reduce blood pressure-related adverse outcomes is unclear, and the benefit of treating to a level of systolic blood pressure well below 140 mm Hg has not been proven in a large, definitive clinical trial. To describe the design considerations of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and the baseline characteristics of trial participants. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that compares two strategies for treating systolic blood pressure: one targets the standard target of <140 mm Hg, and the other targets a more intensive target of <120 mm Hg. Enrollment focused on volunteers of age ≥50 years (no upper limit) with an average baseline systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg and evidence of cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, 10-year Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score ≥15%, or age ≥75 years. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial recruitment also targeted three pre-specified subgroups: participants with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), participants with a history of cardiovascular disease, and participants 75 years of age or older. The primary outcome is first the occurrence of a myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular disease death. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, decline in kidney function or development of end-stage renal disease, incident dementia, decline in cognitive function, and small-vessel cerebral ischemic disease. Between 8 November 2010 and 15 March 2013, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial recruited and randomized 9361 people at 102 clinics, including 3331 women, 2648 with chronic kidney disease, 1877 with a history of cardiovascular disease, 3962 minorities, and 2636 ≥75 years of age. Although the overall recruitment target was met, the numbers recruited in the high-risk subgroups were lower than planned. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial will provide important information on the risks and benefits of intensive blood pressure treatment targets in a diverse sample of high-risk participants, including those with prior cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and those aged ≥75 years. © The Author(s) 2014.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults.

            IMPORTANCE The effect of serious injuries, such as hip fracture and head injury, on mortality and function is comparable to that of cardiovascular events. Concerns have been raised about the risk of fall injuries in older adults taking antihypertensive medications. The low risk of fall injuries reported in clinical trials of healthy older adults may not reflect the risk in older adults with multiple chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE To determine whether antihypertensive medication use was associated with experiencing a serious fall injury in a nationally representative sample of older adults. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND SETTING Competing risk analysis as performed with propensity score adjustment and matching in the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey cohort during a 3-year follow-up through 2009. Participants included 4961 community-living adults older than 70 years with hypertension. EXPOSURES Antihypertensive medication intensity based on the standardized daily dose for each antihypertensive medication class that participants used. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Serious fall injuries, including hip and other major fractures, traumatic brain injuries, and joint dislocations, ascertained through Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims. RESULTS Of the 4961 participants, 14.1% received no antihypertensive medications; 54.6% were in the moderate-intensity and 31.3% in the high-intensity antihypertensive groups. During follow-up, 446 participants (9.0%) experienced serious fall injuries, and 837 (16.9%) died. The adjusted hazard ratios for serious fall injury were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.03-1.90) in the moderate-intensity and 1.28 (95% CI, 0.91-1.80) in the high-intensity antihypertensive groups compared with nonusers. Although the difference in adjusted hazard ratios across the groups did not reach statistical significance, results were similar in the propensity score-matched subcohort. Among 503 participants with a previous fall injury, the adjusted hazard ratios were 2.17 (95% CI, 0.98-4.80) for the moderate-intensity and 2.31 (95% CI, 1.01-5.29) for the high-intensity antihypertensive groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Antihypertensive medications were associated with an increased risk of serious fall injuries, particularly among those with previous fall injuries. The potential harms vs benefits of antihypertensive medications should be weighed in deciding to continue treatment with antihypertensive medications in older adults with multiple chronic conditions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
                J Am Geriatr Soc
                Wiley
                00028614
                April 2018
                April 2018
                March 30 2018
                : 66
                : 4
                : 679-686
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine, Section on Department of Geriatric Medicine; School of Medicine; Wake Forest University; Winston-Salem North Carolina
                [2 ]Division of Public Health Sciences; School of Medicine; Wake Forest University; Winston-Salem North Carolina
                [3 ]Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Gainesville Florida
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology; University of Florida; Gainesville Florida
                [5 ]Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Houston Texas
                [6 ]Baylor College of Medicine; Houston Texas
                [7 ]Bedford Veterans Affairs Hospital; Bedford Massachusetts
                [8 ]School of Medicine; Boston University; Boston Massachusetts
                [9 ]School of Public Health; Boston University; Boston Massachusetts
                [10 ]Division of General Internal Medicine; School of Medicine; University of Utah; Salt Lake City Utah
                [11 ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics; Wexner Medical Center; Ohio State University; Columbus Ohio
                [12 ]Department of Preventive Medicine; University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Memphis Tennessee
                [13 ]Department of Cardiology; School of Medicine; Wake Forest University; Winston-Salem North Carolina
                [14 ]Renal Section; New Mexico VA Health Care System; Albuquerque New Mexico
                [15 ]Division of Geriatrics; School of Medicine; University of Utah; Salt Lake City Utah
                [16 ]Department of Veterans; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center; Salt Lake City Utah
                [17 ]Primary Care Division; Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Milwaukee Wisconsin
                [18 ]Department of Medicine; Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee Wisconsin
                [19 ]Department of Primary Care; Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University Cleveland Campus; Cleveland Ohio
                [20 ]National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; Bethesda Maryland
                Article
                10.1111/jgs.15236
                8045467
                29601076
                91d988fb-d193-433f-af83-ea433c6816c6
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article