2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of Cysteine Protease C of Leishmania donovani in Comparison with Glycoprotein 63 and Elongation Factor 1α for Diagnosis of Human Visceral Leishmaniasis and for Posttreatment Follow-Up Response

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a threat in many developing countries. Much effort has been put to eliminating this disease, for which serodiagnosis remains the mainstay for VL control programs. New and improved antigens as diagnostic candidates are required, though, as the available antigens fail to demonstrate equal optimum performance in all areas of endemicity. Moreover, these diagnoses are dependent on invasive serum sampling. In the current study, we cloned and expressed Leishmania donovani cysteine protease C (CPC) and evaluated its diagnostic and test-of-cure possibilities by detecting the antibody levels in human serum and urine through ELISA and immunoblot assays. Two immunodominant antigens, recombinant glycoprotein 63 (GP63) and elongation factor 1α (EF1α), identified earlier by our group, were also assessed by employing human serum and urine samples. Of these three antigens in ELISAs, CPC demonstrated the highest sensitivities of 98.15% and 96% positive testing in serum and urine of VL patients, respectively. Moreover, CPC yielded 100% specificity with serum and urine of nonendemic healthy controls compared to GP63 and EF1α. Urine samples were found to be more specific than serum for distinguishing endemic healthy controls and other diseases by means of all three antigens. In all cases, CPC gave the most promising results. Unlike serum, urine tests demonstrated a significant decrease in antibody levels for CPC, GP63, and EF1α after 6 months of treatment. The diagnostic and test-of-cure performances of CPC in the immunoblot assay were found to be better than those of GP63 and EF1α. In conclusion, CPC, followed by GP63 and EF1α, may be utilized as candidates for diagnosis of VL and to assess treatment response.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Leishmaniasis

          Leishmaniasis is a poverty-related disease with two main clinical forms: visceral leishmaniasis and cutaneous leishmaniasis. An estimated 0·7-1 million new cases of leishmaniasis per year are reported from nearly 100 endemic countries. The number of reported visceral leishmaniasis cases has decreased substantially in the past decade as a result of better access to diagnosis and treatment and more intense vector control within an elimination initiative in Asia, although natural cycles in transmission intensity might play a role. In east Africa however, the case numbers of this fatal disease continue to be sustained. Increased conflict in endemic areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis and forced displacement has resulted in a surge in these endemic areas as well as clinics across the world. WHO lists leishmaniasis as one of the neglected tropical diseases for which the development of new treatments is a priority. Major evidence gaps remain, and new tools are needed before leishmaniasis can be definitively controlled.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control?

            Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a systemic protozoan disease that is transmitted by phlebotomine sandflies. Poor and neglected populations in East Africa and the Indian sub-continent are particularly affected. Early and accurate diagnosis and treatment remain key components of VL control. In addition to improved diagnostic tests, accurate and simple tests are needed to identify treatment failures. Miltefosine, paromomycin and liposomal amphotericin B are gradually replacing pentavalent antimonials and conventional amphotericin B as the preferred treatments in some regions, but in other areas these drugs are still being evaluated in both mono- and combination therapies. New diagnostic tools and new treatment strategies will only have an impact if they are made widely available to patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostics for the developing world.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Microbiology
                J Clin Microbiol
                American Society for Microbiology
                0095-1137
                1098-660X
                October 21 2020
                October 21 2020
                August 26 2020
                : 58
                : 11
                Article
                10.1128/JCM.00213-20
                926dec08-f191-4d37-96cf-ccb9f2abb1c4
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article