8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lived Experiences of Family Members of Patients With Severe COVID-19 Who Died in Intensive Care Units in France

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What is the experience of bereaved family members after the death of a loved one in an intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic?

          Findings

          In this qualitative study of 19 bereaved family members, participants reported difficulties in establishing a bond with the ICU team and maintaining a relationship with their loved ones during their stay in the ICU. They also described a feeling of “stolen moments” after the death of their loved one, generating strong feelings of disbelief that could potentially lead to complicated grieving.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that while adapting care practices and visiting policies is necessary given the public health menace, preventing families from seeing their loved ones altogether was highly detrimental: specific family-centered guidelines for crisis management are needed.

          Abstract

          This qualitative study describes the experiences of family members of patients who died of COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs) in France.

          Abstract

          Importance

          During the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic, family members were often separated from their loved ones admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), with a potential for negative experiences and psychological burden.

          Objective

          To better understand the experiences of bereaved family members of patients who died in an ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the time of hospital admission until after the patient’s death.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This qualitative study used semistructured, in-depth interviews to collect experiences from bereaved family members of patients who died from severe COVID-19 in 12 ICUs during the first wave of the pandemic in France. Purposeful sampling was used to ensure the diversity of study participants with respect to sex, age, relationship with the patient, and geographic location. All data were collected between June and September 2020, and data analysis was performed from August to November 2020.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Interviews were conducted 3 to 4 months after the patient’s death and were audio-recorded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

          Results

          Among 19 family members interviewed (median [range] age, 46 [23-75] years; 14 [74%] women), 3 major themes emerged from qualitative analysis. The first was the difficulty in building a relationship with the ICU clinicians and dealing with the experience of solitude: family members experienced difficulties in establishing rapport and bonding with the ICU team as well as understanding the medical information. Distance communication was not sufficient, and participants felt it increased the feeling of solitude. The second involved the patient in the ICU and the risks of separation: because of restricted access to the ICU, family members experienced discontinuity and interruptions in the relationship with their loved one, which were associated with feelings of powerlessness, abandonment, and unreality. The third was regarding disruptions in end-of-life rituals: family members described “stolen moments” after the patient’s death, generating strong feelings of disbelief that may lead to complicated grief.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This qualitative study found that during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, bereaved family members described a disturbed experience, both during the ICU stay and after the patient’s death. Specific family-centered crisis guidelines are needed to improve experiences for patients, families, and clinicians experiences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

            Saturation has attained widespread acceptance as a methodological principle in qualitative research. It is commonly taken to indicate that, on the basis of the data that have been collected or analysed hitherto, further data collection and/or analysis are unnecessary. However, there appears to be uncertainty as to how saturation should be conceptualized, and inconsistencies in its use. In this paper, we look to clarify the nature, purposes and uses of saturation, and in doing so add to theoretical debate on the role of saturation across different methodologies. We identify four distinct approaches to saturation, which differ in terms of the extent to which an inductive or a deductive logic is adopted, and the relative emphasis on data collection, data analysis, and theorizing. We explore the purposes saturation might serve in relation to these different approaches, and the implications for how and when saturation will be sought. In examining these issues, we highlight the uncertain logic underlying saturation—as essentially a predictive statement about the unobserved based on the observed, a judgement that, we argue, results in equivocation, and may in part explain the confusion surrounding its use. We conclude that saturation should be operationalized in a way that is consistent with the research question(s), and the theoretical position and analytic framework adopted, but also that there should be some limit to its scope, so as not to risk saturation losing its coherence and potency if its conceptualization and uses are stretched too widely.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.

              Intensive care unit (ICU) admission of a relative is a stressful event that may cause symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Factors associated with these symptoms need to be identified. For patients admitted to 21 ICUs between March and November 2003, we studied the family member with the main potential decision-making role. Ninety days after ICU discharge or death, family members completed the Impact of Event Scale (which evaluates the severity of post-traumatic stress reactions), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey during a telephone interview. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with the risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Interviews were obtained for family members of 284 (62%) of the 459 eligible patients. Post-traumatic stress symptoms consistent with a moderate to major risk of PTSD were found in 94 (33.1%) family members. Higher rates were noted among family members who felt information was incomplete in the ICU (48.4%), who shared in decision making (47.8%), whose relative died in the ICU (50%), whose relative died after end-of-life decisions (60%), and who shared in end-of-life decisions (81.8%). Severe post-traumatic stress reaction was associated with increased rates of anxiety and depression and decreased quality of life. Post-traumatic stress reaction consistent with a high risk of PTSD is common in family members of ICU patients and is the rule among those who share in end-of-life decisions. Research is needed to investigate PTSD rates and to devise preventive and early-detection strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                21 June 2021
                June 2021
                21 June 2021
                : 4
                : 6
                : e2113355
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Famiréa Research Group, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique–Hȏpitaux de Paris, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France
                [2 ]Inserm Centre d'investigation clinique 1431, Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
                [3 ]Assistance Publique–Hȏpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-universitaire Nord, Hôpital Fernand Widal, Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Paris, France
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 15, 2021.
                Published: June 21, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13355
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Kentish-Barnes N et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Nancy Kentish-Barnes, PhD, Famiréa Research Group, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique–Hȏpitaux de Paris, Saint Louis University Hospital, One Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France ( nancy.kentish@ 123456aphp.fr ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Kentish-Barnes had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Kentish-Barnes, Pochard, Azoulay.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Kentish-Barnes, Cohen-Solal, Morin, Pochard, Azoulay.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Obtained funding: Azoulay.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Kentish-Barnes, Cohen-Solal, Souppart, Azoulay.
                Supervision: Kentish-Barnes, Pochard, Azoulay.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kentish-Barnes reported receiving grants from French Ministry of Health outside the submitted work. Dr Azoulay reported receiving grants from Pfizer and Merck and personal fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Baxter International, and Gilead outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by the French Ministry of Health to the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (grant No. PHRC 2020, APHP200389).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Neither the funder nor the sponsor (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris) had a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Fabrice Bruneel, MD; Alain Cariou, MD, PhD; Alexandre Demoule, MD, PhD; Kada Klouche, MD, PhD; Achille Kouatchet, MD; Guillaume Géri, MD, PhD; Christophe Guitton, MD, PhD; Vincent Labbé, MD, PhD; Jean-Pierre Quenot, MD, PhD; Jean Reignier, MD, PhD; and Danielle Reuter, MD, assisted in the practical organization of this study. They were not compensated for their work.
                Article
                zoi210401
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13355
                8218069
                34152418
                92fc4690-eba3-4b8f-96cb-e17f896592db
                Copyright 2021 Kentish-Barnes N et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 9 February 2021
                : 15 April 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Critical Care Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article