6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cognitions and behaviours of general practitioners in France regarding HPV vaccination: A theory-based systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is safe and efficacious to prevent persistent HPV infection, precancerous anogenital lesions and cervical cancer. However, in countries where vaccination programmes are implemented outside of schools, such as France, reaching high HPV vaccination coverage of the target population is challenging. Many studies have been performed in France to assess cognitions of general practitioners (GPs) regarding HPV vaccination. However, the evidence is not consistent about which cognitions are key. To provide a comprehensive overview, we performed a systematic review of studies conducted in France on GPs' cognitions regarding HPV vaccination and used the reasoned action approach to extract and synthesize data. The systematic search was performed up to July 2020 in Medline via PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Pascal and Francis databases. Grey literature was searched for in the French Public Health Database, Cairn. Info, yahoo.fr, and Google Scholar. Twenty-five scientific publications were selected based on eligibility criteria and assessed for quality. Our qualitative synthesis highlights that although 73% of GPs report recommending HPV vaccination, up to 50% would not recommend it because of concerns, including changes in patients' health behaviours and doubts about safety and/or efficacy. GPs' injunctive norms, i.e. trust in institutional information, were shown to be associated positively with GPs' willingness to recommend HPV vaccination. Parents' fears, girls' age, and potential connection with sexuality do not seem to affect GPs' recommendations. These results will inform the development of a professional educational intervention targeting GPs in France.

          Highlights

          • A majority of general practitioners in France report recommending HPV vaccination.

          • In reality, up to 50% of general practitioners do not recommend HPV vaccination.

          • The reason for this is concerns about vaccine efficacy, harms, and impact.

          • Patient-related barriers do not affect general practitioners' recommendations.

          • Ways should be found to effectively convey HPV vaccination information to doctors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med
                Prev Med
                Preventive Medicine
                Academic Press
                0091-7435
                1096-0260
                1 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 143
                : 106323
                Affiliations
                [a ]Laboratoire GRePS (EA 4163), Université Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France
                [b ]The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), Sheffield S1 4DA, United Kingdom
                [c ]Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones, Biomédicas, San Jose, Costa Rica
                [d ]Screening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (IARC – WHO), 69372 Lyon, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Screening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. villainp@ 123456iarc.fr
                Article
                S0091-7435(20)30347-9 106323
                10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106323
                7840585
                33171178
                93195cc5-452a-4472-892d-b6da14e4abcc
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

                History
                : 23 January 2020
                : 4 November 2020
                : 5 November 2020
                Categories
                Review Article

                Medicine
                general practitioners,reasoned action approach,hpv vaccination,france
                Medicine
                general practitioners, reasoned action approach, hpv vaccination, france

                Comments

                Comment on this article