3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      A qualitative evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR) in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations

      research-article
      Ritsuko Kakuma , Onah Uchenna Cajethan , Frances Shawyer , Vrinda Edan , Elisabeth Wilson-Evered , Graham Meadows , Lisa Brophy
      International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care
      Emerald Publishing
      Personal recovery, Mental health, Culturally and linguistically diverse, QPR, Migrant, Refugee, Outcome measurement, Questionnaire, CALD, Migrant, Australia, Asylum seeker

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Mental health recovery across cultures lacks understanding and suitable measures. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) is a self-report instrument measuring personal recovery outcomes for consumers of mental health services. However, the extent of its relevance among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities is unclear. This pilot study aimed to examine the relevance and utility of the QPR among CALD consumers of primary mental health services in Australia.

          Design/methodology/approach

          Eleven individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with two general practitioners (GPs) and nine consumers from two clinics, at locations with high Iranian and Burmese refugee or asylum seeker populations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach.

          Findings

          Although almost all consumers had little or no understanding of the concept of personal recovery, they found the QPR culturally acceptable and understandable. Using the QPR during mental health consultations can help with needs identification and goal setting. Challenges in using the QPR included completion time, cross-cultural differences in concepts and norms for some items, and need for careful translation. Consumers suggested additional items regarding family reputation, sexuality, and spirituality.

          Originality/value

          The QPR is potentially a valuable tool to support mental health consultations with CALD consumers, from the perspectives of both GPs and consumers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

          No systematic review and narrative synthesis on personal recovery in mental illness has been undertaken. To synthesise published descriptions and models of personal recovery into an empirically based conceptual framework. Systematic review and modified narrative synthesis. Out of 5208 papers that were identified and 366 that were reviewed, a total of 97 papers were included in this review. The emergent conceptual framework consists of: (a) 13 characteristics of the recovery journey; (b) five recovery processes comprising: connectedness; hope and optimism about the future; identity; meaning in life; and empowerment (giving the acronym CHIME); and (c) recovery stage descriptions which mapped onto the transtheoretical model of change. Studies that focused on recovery for individuals of Black and minority ethnic (BME) origin showed a greater emphasis on spirituality and stigma and also identified two additional themes: culturally specific facilitating factors and collectivist notions of recovery. The conceptual framework is a theoretically defensible and robust synthesis of people's experiences of recovery in mental illness. This provides an empirical basis for future recovery-oriented research and practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version

              Background The objective of this study was to translate and to test the reliability and validity of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Iran. Methods Using a standard 'forward-backward' translation procedure, the English language version of the questionnaire was translated into Persian (Iranian language). Then a sample of young people aged 18 to 25 years old completed the questionnaire. In addition, a short questionnaire containing demographic questions and a single measure of global quality of life was administered. To test reliability the internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was performed using convergent validity. Finally, the factor structure of the questionnaire was extracted by performing principal component analysis using oblique factor solution. Results In all 748 young people entered into the study. The mean age of respondents was 21.1 (SD = 2.1) years. Employing the recommended method of scoring (ranging from 0 to 12), the mean GHQ score was 3.7 (SD = 3.5). Reliability analysis showed satisfactory result (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.87). Convergent validity indicated a significant negative correlation between the GHQ-12 and global quality of life scores as expected (r = -0.56, P < 0.0001). The principal component analysis with oblique rotation solution showed that the GHQ-12 was a measure of psychological morbidity with two-factor structure that jointly accounted for 51% of the variance. Conclusion The study findings showed that the Iranian version of the GHQ-12 has a good structural characteristic and is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used for measuring psychological well being in Iran.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                IJMHSC
                10.1108/IJMHSC
                International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care
                IJMHSC
                Emerald Publishing
                1747-9894
                1747-9894
                02 February 2024
                27 February 2024
                : 20
                : 1
                : 88-103
                Affiliations
                [1]Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; , London, UK and the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne; , Melbourne, Australia
                [2]Disaster Management and Social Development, Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs; , Abuja, Nigeria
                [3]Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; , Melbourne, Australia
                [4]Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne; , Melbourne, Australia and Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; , Melbourne, Australia
                [5]Institute of Health and Sport, Victoria University; , Melbourne, Australia
                [6]Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia and Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; , Melbourne, Australia and the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne; , Melbourne, Australia
                [7]Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne; , Melbourne, Australia and School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University; , Melbourne, Australia
                Author notes
                Frances Shawyer can be contacted at: frances.shawyer@monash.edu
                Article
                716127 IJMHSC-05-2023-0042.pdf IJMHSC-05-2023-0042
                10.1108/IJMHSC-05-2023-0042
                9349fb86-00c3-4cb9-8335-d1ecdb040aad
                © Emerald Publishing Limited
                History
                : 10 May 2023
                : 23 November 2023
                : 22 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 68, Pages: 16, Words: 9300
                Categories
                research-article, Research paper
                cat-HSC, Health & social care
                , Vulnerable groups
                , Inequalities & diverse/minority groups
                , Sociology
                , Race & ethnic studies
                , Minorities
                , Sociology
                , Race & ethnic studies
                , Multiculturalism
                , Sociology
                , Race & ethnic studies
                , Racial identity
                , Sociology
                , Work
                , economy & organizations
                , Labour movements
                Custom metadata
                M
                Web-ready article package
                Yes
                Yes
                JOURNAL
                included

                Refugee,Outcome measurement,Questionnaire,CALD,Migrant,Australia,Asylum seeker,Personal recovery,Mental health,Culturally and linguistically diverse,QPR

                Comments

                Comment on this article