18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predicting the continuum between corridors and barriers to animal movements using Step Selection Functions and Randomized Shortest Paths.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The loss, fragmentation and degradation of habitat everywhere on Earth prompts increasing attention to identifying landscape features that support animal movement (corridors) or impedes it (barriers). Most algorithms used to predict corridors assume that animals move through preferred habitat either optimally (e.g. least cost path) or as random walkers (e.g. current models), but neither extreme is realistic. We propose that corridors and barriers are two sides of the same coin and that animals experience landscapes as spatiotemporally dynamic corridor-barrier continua connecting (separating) functional areas where individuals fulfil specific ecological processes. Based on this conceptual framework, we propose a novel methodological approach that uses high-resolution individual-based movement data to predict corridor-barrier continua with increased realism. Our approach consists of two innovations. First, we use step selection functions (SSF) to predict friction maps quantifying corridor-barrier continua for tactical steps between consecutive locations. Secondly, we introduce to movement ecology the randomized shortest path algorithm (RSP) which operates on friction maps to predict the corridor-barrier continuum for strategic movements between functional areas. By modulating the parameter Ѳ, which controls the trade-off between exploration and optimal exploitation of the environment, RSP bridges the gap between algorithms assuming optimal movements (when Ѳ approaches infinity, RSP is equivalent to LCP) or random walk (when Ѳ → 0, RSP → current models). Using this approach, we identify migration corridors for GPS-monitored wild reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus) in Norway. We demonstrate that reindeer movement is best predicted by an intermediate value of Ѳ, indicative of a movement trade-off between optimization and exploration. Model calibration allows identification of a corridor-barrier continuum that closely fits empirical data and demonstrates that RSP outperforms models that assume either optimality or random walk. The proposed approach models the multiscale cognitive maps by which animals likely navigate real landscapes and generalizes the most common algorithms for identifying corridors. Because suboptimal, but non-random, movement strategies are likely widespread, our approach has the potential to predict more realistic corridor-barrier continua for a wide range of species.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anim Ecol
          The Journal of animal ecology
          Wiley-Blackwell
          1365-2656
          0021-8790
          Jan 2016
          : 85
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685 Sluppen, Trondheim, NO-7485, Norway.
          [2 ] ICTEAM/UCL, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
          [3 ] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E9, Canada.
          [4 ] Department of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway.
          [5 ] Department of Animal and Human Biology, Sapienza University, Viale dell'Università 32, Rome, 00185, Italy.
          Article
          10.1111/1365-2656.12386
          25950737
          9571b96b-394d-4648-b8ce-aa565f60be17
          History

          bottlenecks,connectivity,gene flow,graph theory,green infrastructures,obstacles,permeability,space use,tactical and strategic movements

          Comments

          Comment on this article